arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1008.1111astro-ph.SR
收藏

Herbig-Haro天体Spitzer-IRAC辐射的详细研究(I):激波辐射的形态和通量比

A Detailed Study of Spitzer-IRAC Emission in Herbig-Haro Objects (I): Morphology and Flux Ratios of Shocked Emission

Michihiro Takami, Jennifer L. Karr, Haegon Koh, How-Huan Chen, Hsu-Tai Lee

摘要:

我们对6个赫比格-哈罗天体(HH 54/211/212,L 1157/1448,BHR 71)的Spitzer-IRAC图像进行了详细的分析。我们的分析包括:(1)四条IRAC带之间的形态学比较(3.6、4.5、5.8和8.0 μ m)和2.12 μ m处的H2 1-0 S(1);以及(3)将这些结果与LTE(四个频带中的207条线)和非LTE(32-45条线,取决于用于碰撞的粒子)下的热H2发射的计算进行比较。我们发现,在3.6和4.5 μ m处观察到的形貌彼此相似,并且与H2 1-0 S(1)相似。如果解离速率显著大于0.002-0.02,则这可以通过非LTE下的热H2发射来很好地解释,从而允许热碰撞由原子氢主导。相比之下,5.8和8.0 μ m的发射在某些区域显示出与其他发射不同的形态。这种发射似乎是更多的增强在尾流在弓激波,或增强较少的补丁结构中的射流。这些趋势被解释的事实,即热H2发射在5.8和8.0 μ m波段增强在较低的密度和温度的区域。在整个过程中,观察到的相似性和四个带和1-0 S(1)之间的形态差异很好地解释了热H2发射。所观察到的SED被分类为:-(A)通量随波长单调增加的SED;以及(B)在4.5 μ m处具有过量发射的SED。A型SED解释热H2排放,特别是简单的冲击模型与幂律冷却功能。我们的计算表明,类型B的SED需要额外的污染排放在4.5微米波段。CO的振动发射是最有希望的候选者,和其他污染物讨论到目前为止,不太可能解释所观察到的SED。

英文摘要:

We present a detailed analysis of Spitzer-IRAC images obtained toward six Herbig-Haro objects (HH 54/211/212, L 1157/1448, BHR 71). Our analysis includes: (1) comparisons in morphology between the four IRAC bands (3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0 um), and H2 1-0 S(1) at 2.12 um for three out of six objects; (2) measurements of spectral energy distributions (SEDs) at selected positions; and (3) comparisons of these results with calculations of thermal H2 emission at LTE (207 lines in four bands) and non-LTE (32-45 lines, depending on particle for collisions). We show that the morphologies observed at 3.6 and 4.5 um are similar to each other, and to H2 1-0 S(1). This is well explained by thermal H2 emission at non-LTE if the dissociation rate is significantly larger than 0.002-0.02, allowing thermal collisions to be dominated by atomic hydrogen. In contrast, the 5.8 and 8.0 um emission shows different morphologies from the others in some regions. This emission appears to be more enhanced at the wakes in bow shocks, or less enhanced in patchy structures in the jet. These tendencies are explained by the fact that thermal H2 emission in the 5.8 and 8.0 um band is enhanced in regions at lower densities and temperatures. Throughout, the observed similarities and differences in morphology between four bands and 1-0 S(1) are well explained by thermal H2 emission. The observed SEDs are categorized into:- (A) those in which the flux monotonically increases with wavelength; and (B) those with excess emission at 4.5-um. The type-A SEDs are explained by thermal H2 emission, in particular with simple shock models with a power-law cooling function. Our calculations suggest that the type-B SEDs require extra contaminating emission in the 4.5-um band. The CO vibrational emission is the most promising candidate, and the other contaminants discussed to date are not likely to explain the observed SEDs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑