arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1007.4541hep-phhep-ex
收藏

$X(3872)$的$J^P=2^-$赋值是否与辐射跃迁数据一致?

Is the $J^P=2^-$ assignment for the $X(3872)$ compatible with the radiative transition data?

Yu Jia, Wen-Long Sang, Jia Xu

摘要:

BaBar合作组织最近的分析表明,$X(3872)$可能倾向于量子数$J^{PC}=2^{-+}$,而不是之前假设的$1^{++}$。通过将$η_{c2}(1D)$粲偶素假设为$X(3872)$,在几种唯象势模型下研究了宇称偶辐射跃迁过程$η_{c2}(1D)\to J/ψ(ψ')+γ$。我们考虑了$ψ'$中的${}^3D_1$混合物,并考虑了磁偶极子($M1$),电四极($E2$)和磁八极($M3$)振幅的贡献。结果发现,这两个通道的分支分数的比率,以及$η_{c2}\to ψ'γ$的绝对分支分数,是在与现有的\textsc{BaBar}测量的鲜明矛盾。这可以指示用于$X(3872)$的$2^{-+}$分配是高度有问题的。

英文摘要:

The very recent analysis by BaBar Collaboration indicates that the $X(3872)$ may favor the quantum number $J^{PC}=2^{-+}$ rather than the previously assumed $1^{++}$. By pretending the $η_{c2}(1D)$ charmonium to be the $X(3872)$, we study the parity-even radiative transition processes $η_{c2}(1D)\to J/ψ(ψ')+γ$ within several phenomenological potential models. We take the ${}^3D_1$ admixture in $ψ'$ into account, and consider the contributions from the magnetic dipole ($M1$), electric quadrupole ($E2$), and magnetic octupole ($M3$) amplitudes. It is found that the ratio of the branching fractions of these two channels, as well as the absolute branching fraction of $η_{c2}\to ψ'γ$, are in stark contradiction with the existing \textsc{BaBar} measurements. This may indicate that the $2^{-+}$ assignment for the $X(3872)$ is highly problematic.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑