arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1004.3547physics.soc-phcs.CY
收藏

社交媒体的治理:维基百科推广过程的案例研究

Governance in Social Media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process

Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg

摘要:

社交媒体网站通常由一群致力于各种形式治理的核心用户指导。这种类型的治理的一个关键方面是审议,这样一个小组就对网站重要的问题做出决定。尽管它在一些著名的社交媒体网站的运作中发挥着至关重要的作用,但对社交媒体治理的审议方面的调查相对较少。在这里,我们探讨这个问题,调查一个特定的审议过程,是广泛的,公开的,并记录:维基百科管理员的晋升,这是由选举,参与维基百科社区的承诺成员决定。我们发现,在这个过程的核心群体决策表现出几种基本形式的相对评估。首先,我们观察到,选民支持候选人的机会很大程度上取决于选民和候选人特征之间的关系。其次,我们研究如何个人选民的决定和整体选举结果可以根据模型,考虑到顺序,投票的公共性质。

英文摘要:

Social media sites are often guided by a core group of committed users engaged in various forms of governance. A crucial aspect of this type of governance is deliberation, in which such a group reaches decisions on issues of importance to the site. Despite its crucial --- though subtle --- role in how a number of prominent social media sites function, there has been relatively little investigation of the deliberative aspects of social media governance. Here we explore this issue, investigating a particular deliberative process that is extensive, public, and recorded: the promotion of Wikipedia admins, which is determined by elections that engage committed members of the Wikipedia community. We find that the group decision-making at the heart of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take into account the sequential, public nature of the voting.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑