信息计量学中伪科学的危害
The danger of pseudo science in Informetrics
摘要:
这封信是对两篇论文的补充:1)Opthof和Leydesdorff arxiv:1002.2769 2)Van Raan et al. arxiv:1003.2113 Van Raan声称操作顺序(先除后加)不适用于引文分析。在我的贡献中,我讨论了物理学和医学中的一些类似物,并认为在任何其他科学领域,量都没有物理或金融意义,这意味着数字有一个真正的度量单位,它将被允许忽略运算法则。因此,CWTS声称操作的顺序是不相关的,这使得研究忽略了CWTS在“伪科学”类别中所做的这一规则。
英文摘要:
Two papers have been archived to which this letter is complementary: 1) Opthof and Leydesdorff arxiv:1002.2769 2) Van Raan et al. arxiv:1003.2113 Van Raan at all claims that the order of operations (first dividing then adding) does not apply to citation analysis. In my contribution I discuss a few analogues in Physics and Medicine and argue that in no other field of science where quantities have physical or financial meaning, implying that that numbers have a real unit of measure, it would be allowed to ignore the rule of operations. Hence, the claim of CWTS that the order of operations is not relevant brings studies ignoring this rule as done by CWTS in the category 'Pseudo Science'.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。