arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1002.3614astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
收藏

测量减小的剪切力

Measuring the Reduced Shear

Jun Zhang

摘要:

在弱透镜测量中,忽略二阶修正会导致宇宙剪切的百分之几的不确定性,这对星系团透镜质量重建变得更加重要。当存在点扩散函数时,现有的声称测量约化剪切的方法不一定精确到二阶。我们表明,张(2008)的方法准确地测量在PSF的存在下,在二阶水平的约化剪切。为进一步证实我们的计算,以及根据一阶性质判断二阶剪切测量方法的精度,提供了一个简单的定理。Zhang(2008)的方法在数学上得到了很好的定义。它不需要对星系的形态和PSF的假设。为了达到亚百分比级的精度,CCD像素尺寸需要不大于PSF的半高宽(FWHM)的1/3。使用一个大的集合(> 10^7)的模拟星系的不受限制的形态,我们发现,污染的剪切信号从背景光子的噪声可以被删除,在一个定义明确的方式,因为它们不相关的源的形状。由于背景噪声的残余剪切测量误差是一致的,即使当这种噪声的幅度达到约1/10的源通量在半光半径的源在百分之几的水平为零。在我们的模拟中,这个极限原则上可以进一步扩展到更大的星系系综。另一方面,源泊松噪声仍然是系统误差的原因。对于亚百分比级的精度,我们的方法要求源泊松噪声的幅度小于源的半光半径内的源通量的1/80 ~ 1/100,对应于收集大约10^4个源光子。

英文摘要:

Neglecting the second order corrections in weak lensing measurements can lead to a few percent uncertainties on cosmic shears, and becomes more important for cluster lensing mass reconstructions. Existing methods which claim to measure the reduced shears are not necessarily accurate to the second order when a point spread function (PSF) is present. We show that the method of Zhang (2008) exactly measures the reduced shears at the second order level in the presence of PSF. A simple theorem is provided for further confirming our calculation, and for judging the accuracy of any shear measurement method at the second order based on its properties at the first order. The method of Zhang (2008) is well defined mathematically. It does not require assumptions on the morphologies of galaxies and the PSF. To reach a sub-percent level accuracy, the CCD pixel size is required to be not larger than 1/3 of the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the PSF. Using a large ensemble (> 10^7) of mock galaxies of unrestricted morphologies, we find that contaminations to the shear signals from the noise of background photons can be removed in a well defined way because they are not correlated with the source shapes. The residual shear measurement errors due to background noise are consistent with zero at the sub-percent level even when the amplitude of such noise reaches about 1/10 of the source flux within the half-light radius of the source. This limit can in principle be extended further with a larger galaxy ensemble in our simulations. On the other hand, the source Poisson noise remains to be a cause of systematic errors. For a sub-percent level accuracy, our method requires the amplitude of the source Poisson noise to be less than 1/80 ~ 1/100 of the source flux within the half-light radius of the source, corresponding to collecting roughly 10^4 source photons.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑