arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1001.2006astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
收藏

TAOS项目:小KBO星群的上限和外太阳系形成和演化模型的检验

The TAOS Project: Upper Bounds on the Population of Small KBOs and Tests of Models of Formation and Evolution of the Outer Solar System

F. B. Bianco, Z. -W. Zhang, M. J. Lehner, S. Mondal, S. -K. King, J. Giammarco, M. J. Holman, N. K. Coehlo, J. -H. Wang, C. Alcock, T. Axelrod, Y. -I. Byun, W. … 展开作者

F. B. Bianco, Z. -W. Zhang, M. J. Lehner, S. Mondal, S. -K. King, J. Giammarco, M. J. Holman, N. K. Coehlo, J. -H. Wang, C. Alcock, T. Axelrod, Y. -I. Byun, W. P. Chen, K. H. Cook, R. Dave, I. de Pater, D. -W. Kim, T. Lee, H. -C. Lin, J. J. Lissauer, S. L. Marshall, P. Protopapas, J. A. Rice, M. E. Schwamb, S. -Y. Wang, C. -Y. Wen

摘要:

我们分析了TAOS(台美掩星巡天)前3.75年的数据。TAOS监测明亮的恒星,以寻找柯伊伯带天体(KBO)的掩星。该数据集包括以4或5 Hz拍摄的5e5星时的多望远镜光度数据。在该数据集中未发现与KBO掩星一致的事件。我们计算了Pan & Sari(2005)、Kenyon & Bromley(2004)、Benavidez & Campo Bagatin(2009)和Fraser(2009)的柯伊伯带形成和演化模型所预期的事件数量。我们从我们的数据得到的上限的比较约束这些模型的参数空间。这是第一次详细比较模型的KBO大小分布与数据从掩星调查。我们的研究结果表明,KBO人口是由内部强度低的物体和行星迁移的大小分布的塑造中发挥了作用。

英文摘要:

We have analyzed the first 3.75 years of data from TAOS, the Taiwanese American Occultation Survey. TAOS monitors bright stars to search for occultations by Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs). This dataset comprises 5e5 star-hours of multi-telescope photometric data taken at 4 or 5 Hz. No events consistent with KBO occultations were found in this dataset. We compute the number of events expected for the Kuiper Belt formation and evolution models of Pan & Sari (2005), Kenyon & Bromley (2004), Benavidez & Campo Bagatin (2009), and Fraser (2009). A comparison with the upper limits we derive from our data constrains the parameter space of these models. This is the first detailed comparison of models of the KBO size distribution with data from an occultation survey. Our results suggest that the KBO population is comprised of objects with low internal strength and that planetary migration played a role in the shaping of the size distribution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑