意义的交流与期待的结构化--吉登斯的“结构化理论”与卢曼的“自组织”
The Communication of Meaning and the Structuration of Expectations: Giddens' "structuration theory" and Luhmann's "self-organization"
摘要：
不同于香农式信息的意义交流是卢曼社会系统理论和吉登斯行动结构化理论的核心。这些理论都强调反身性，但把意义放在人与人之间的交流和有目的的行动之间的分界线上，作为两个不同的参考系统。将这两个理论结合成一个关于预期结构化的理论，可以基于预期系统的计算算法来模拟意图通信的交互、组织和自组织。自组织和组织层仍然植根于人类遭遇的双重偶然性，这提供了变化。沟通的组织和自组织是相互反思的，因此也是相互重构的。使用三维中的互信息，可以测量建模系统中的意义处理对建模系统中的不确定性的历史组织的印记。这是经验性的情况下，智力组织的“结构化”的结构，在文本领域的科学文章。
英文摘要：
The communication of meaning as different from (Shannon-type) information is central to Luhmann's social systems theory and Giddens' structuration theory of action. These theories share an emphasis on reflexivity, but focus on meaning along a divide between inter-human communication and intentful action as two different systems of reference. Recombining these two theories into a theory about the structuration of expectations, interactions, organization, and self-organization of intentional communications can be simulated based on algorithms from the computation of anticipatory systems. The self-organizing and organizing layers remain rooted in the double contingency of the human encounter which provides the variation. Organization and self-organization of communication are reflexive upon and therefore reconstructive of each other. Using mutual information in three dimensions, the imprint of meaning processing in the modeling system on the historical organization of uncertainty in the modeled system can be measured. This is shown empirically in the case of intellectual organization as "structurating" structure in the textual domain of scientific articles.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
