非现实主义：深思还是软选择？'，由N. Gisin
Comment on 'Non-realism: deep thought or soft option?', by N. Gisin
摘要：
它简要地表明，吉辛的所谓的“局部性”假设[arXiv：0901.4255]实际上是等价于存在一个局部确定性模型。因此，尽管吉辛的建议相反，“当地的现实主义”在贝尔的意义上是建立在他的论点从一开始。他的“定域性”假设可能更适合称为“可分性”。进一步指出，越来越流行的术语“量子非定域性”不仅是误导，而且往往掩盖了无信号和可分性之间的重要区别。特别是，“局部非现实主义”仍然坚定地作为一个硬选项解释贝尔不等式违反。其他选择也被简单地推测出来。
英文摘要：
It is briefly demonstrated that Gisin's so-called 'locality' assumption [arXiv:0901.4255] is in fact equivalent to the existence of a local deterministic model. Thus, despite Gisin's suggestions to the contrary, 'local realism' in the sense of Bell is built into his argument from the very beginning. His 'locality' assumption may more appropriately be labelled 'separability'. It is further noted that the increasingly popular term 'quantum nonlocality' is not only misleading, but tends to obscure the important distinction between no-signalling and separability. In particular, 'local non-realism' remains firmly in place as a hard option for interpreting Bell inequality violations. Other options are briefly speculated on.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
