arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 0902.4460math.OCcs.MAmath.PR
收藏

随机环境下的投票策略:利己主义与集体主义

Strategies of Voting in Stochastic Environment: Egoism and Collectivism

V. I. Borzenko, Z. M. Lezina, A. K. Loginov, Ya. Yu. Tsodikova, P. Yu. Chebotarev

摘要:

会议审议了一种由基于最低限度多数程序的连续集体决定控制的社会动态模式。当前系统状态的特征在于参与者的资本(效用)向量。在每一步中,投票者要么保持现状,要么接受提案,该提案是参与者资本的代数增量的向量。在这个版本的模型中,向量是随机生成的。比较效用的两种社会态度-利己主义和集体主义-进行了分析。人们已经确定,除了一些特殊情况,集体主义者具有优势,这使得以下场景成为可能:在保护公司利益的条件下,一个团体被创建,然后被其成就所吸引的利己主义者加入。在这一点上,群体利己主义接近利他主义。此外,集体主义的一个被认为的变体阻碍了组织者对投票的操纵。

英文摘要:

Consideration was given to a model of social dynamics controlled by successive collective decisions based on the threshold majority procedures. The current system state is characterized by the vector of participants' capitals (utilities). At each step, the voters can either retain their status quo or accept the proposal which is a vector of the algebraic increments in the capitals of the participants. In this version of the model, the vector is generated stochastically. Comparative utility of two social attitudes--egoism and collectivism--was analyzed. It was established that, except for some special cases, the collectivists have advantages, which makes realizable the following scenario: on the conditions of protecting the corporate interests, a group is created which is joined then by the egoists attracted by its achievements. At that, group egoism approaches altruism. Additionally, one of the considered variants of collectivism handicaps manipulation of voting by the organizers.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑