arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0901.3929cs.CYcs.DL
收藏

从集体决策系统的角度重新审视启蒙时代

Revisiting the Age of Enlightenment from a Collective Decision Making Systems Perspective

Marko A. Rodriguez, Jennifer H. Watkins

摘要:

十八世纪启蒙时代的理想是现代民主的基础。这个时代的特点是思想家推动进步的社会改革,反对当时长期建立的贵族和君主制。这些改革的突出例子包括建立不可剥夺的人权、自治共和国和市场资本主义。21世纪的民主国家可以从重新审视启蒙运动时期发展起来的制度中受益,并在信息时代的技术社会背景下重新构建这些制度。本文探讨了社会算法的应用,利用托马斯潘恩(英语:1737- 1809)的代表,亚当斯密(苏格兰:1723- 1790)的自利行为者,和侯爵德孔多塞(法国:1743- 1794)的最佳决策群体。有人认为,技术支持的社交算法可以更好地实现启蒙运动时期所阐述的理想。

英文摘要:

The ideals of the eighteenth century's Age of Enlightenment are the foundation of modern democracies. The era was characterized by thinkers who promoted progressive social reforms that opposed the long-established aristocracies and monarchies of the time. Prominent examples of such reforms include the establishment of inalienable human rights, self-governing republics, and market capitalism. Twenty-first century democratic nations can benefit from revisiting the systems developed during the Enlightenment and reframing them within the techno-social context of the Information Age. This article explores the application of social algorithms that make use of Thomas Paine's (English: 1737--1809) representatives, Adam Smith's (Scottish: 1723--1790) self-interested actors, and Marquis de Condorcet's (French: 1743--1794) optimal decision making groups. It is posited that technology-enabled social algorithms can better realize the ideals articulated during the Enlightenment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑