arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0901.0593physics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn
收藏

基于格子玻尔兹曼方法的湍流亚网格动态模拟

Dynamic Subgrid Scale Modeling of Turbulent Flows using Lattice-Boltzmann Method

Kannan N. Premnath, Martin J. Pattison, Sanjoy Banerjee

摘要:

在本文中,我们讨论了动态亚网格尺度(SGS)模型的格子玻尔兹曼方法(LBM)的大涡模拟(LES)的湍流的合并。动态过程的使用,包括超网格湍流动力学的采样或测试过滤,以及随后使用两个级别的标度不变性,避免了在确定SGS模型的模型系数的大小时需要精确性。我们采用多重弛豫时间(MRT)制定的LBM与强迫项的网格过滤动力学的大涡模拟。的动态过程中示出使用与常见的Smagorinsky涡粘性SGS模型。我们还讨论了适当的采样技术或测试过滤器,促进LBM中的动态模型的实现。为了适应不同的分辨率,我们采用局部细化网格在这个框架。作为例子,我们考虑在两个不同的剪切雷诺数$Re_{*}$为180和395的典型的充分发展的湍流槽道流。该方法能够自动和自洽地计算Smagorinsky系数,$C_S$的值。特别地,在湍流通常更各向同性的外部或整体流动区域中的计算值约为0.155(或模型系数$C=C_S^2=0.024$),其与先前数据良好一致。模型系数也变得更小,并接近零附近的墙壁,反映了阻尼湍流长度尺度附近的墙壁和计算的湍流统计也与以前的数据吻合得很好。本文还讨论了更一般的比例相似性为基础的SGS应力模型纳入的程序。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we discuss the incorporation of dynamic subgrid scale (SGS) models in the lattice-Boltzmann method (LBM) for large-eddy simulation (LES) of turbulent flows. The use of a dynamic procedure, which involves sampling or test-filtering of super-grid turbulence dynamics and subsequent use of scale-invariance for two levels, circumvents the need for empiricism in determining the magnitude of the model coefficient of the SGS models. We employ the multiple relaxation times (MRT) formulation of LBM with a forcing term for simulation of the grid-filtered dynamics of large-eddies. The dynamic procedure is illustrated for use with the common Smagorinsky eddy-viscosity SGS model. We also discuss proper sampling techniques or test-filters that facilitate implementation of dynamic models in the LBM. For accommodating variable resolutions, we employ locally refined grids in this framework. As examples, we consider the canonical fully developed turbulent channel flow at two different shear Reynolds numbers $Re_{*}$ of 180 and 395. The approach is able to automatically and self-consistently compute the values of the Smagorinsky coefficient, $C_S$. In particular, the computed value in the outer or bulk flow region, where turbulence is generally more isotropic, is about 0.155 (or the model coefficient $C=C_S^2=0.024$) which is in good agreement with prior data. The model coefficient is also found to become smaller and approaches towards zero near walls, reflecting the dampening of turbulent length scales near walls and the computed turbulence statistics are also in good agreement with prior data. The paper also discusses a procedure for incorporation of more general scale-similarity based SGS stress models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑