arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0810.1938cond-mat.othercond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
收藏

BCS-BEC交叉的不同配对波动方法比较

Comparison of Different Pairing Fluctuation Approaches to BCS-BEC Crossover

K. Levin, Qijin Chen, Chih-Chun Chien, Yan He

摘要:

BCS -玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚(BEC)交叉的课题特别令人兴奋,因为它在超冷费米气体中的实现及其与高温超导体的可能相关性。在本文中,我们回顾了这一主题的理论工作,这是一个自然的延伸,由莱格特和Nozieres和施密特-林克(NSR)的开创性论文。前者只涉及基态,现在被称为“BCS-Leggett”波函数,后者的关键贡献涉及超流转变温度$T_c$的计算。这两篇论文产生了两个主要的,重要的是,不同的,在BCS-BEC交叉文学理论流派。其中第一个扩展BCS Leggett基态有限温度和第二个扩展NSR计划远离$T_c$在超流和正常阶段。现在人们普遍认为,NSR的这些扩展产生了与莱格特首次引入的不同的基态。我们的分析表明,如何基于NSR的方法更完整地查看玻色子的贡献,但它把费米子作为“准自由”。相比之下,基于BCS-莱格特的方法更完整地处理了费米子的贡献,但它将玻色子视为“准自由”。基于NSR的方案从BEC极限开始接近BCS和BEC之间的交叉,基于BCS-Leggett的方案从BCS极限开始接近该交叉。最终,人们希望将这两种方案结合起来。在本文中,我们回顾了这两种方法的优点和缺点。为了达到一个全面的理解,重要的是在未来投入精力,更详细地调查T=0方面的NSR为基础的理论和$T \neq 0$方面的BCS-Leggett理论。

英文摘要:

The subject of BCS - Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover is particularly exciting because of its realization in ultracold Fermi gases and its possible relevance to high temperature superconductors. In the paper we review that body of theoretical work on this subject which represents a natural extension of the seminal papers by Leggett and by Nozieres and Schmitt-Rink (NSR). The former addressed only the ground state, now known as the "BCS-Leggett" wave-function and the key contributions of the latter pertain to calculations of the superfluid transition temperature $T_c$. These two papers have given rise to two main and, importantly, distinct, theoretical schools in the BCS-BEC crossover literature. The first of these extends the BCS-Leggett ground state to finite temperature and the second extends the NSR scheme away from $T_c$ both in the superfluid and normal phases. It is now rather widely accepted that these extensions of NSR produce a different ground state than that first introduced by Leggett. Our analysis shows how the NSR-based approach views the bosonic contributions more completely but it treats the fermions as "quasi-free". By contrast, the BCS-Leggett based approach treats the fermionic contributions more completely but it treats the bosons as "quasi-free". The NSR based schemes approach the crossover between BCS and BEC by starting from the BEC limit and the BCS-Leggett based scheme approaches this crossover by starting from the BCS limit. Ultimately, one would like to combine these two schemes. In this paper we review the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches. To reach a full understanding, it is important in the future to invest effort in investigating in more detail the T=0 aspects of NSR-based theory and the $T \neq 0$ aspects of BCS-Leggett theory.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑