arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0809.2140astro-ph
收藏

X射线双星LMC X-1的电离锥

Ionization Cone in the X-ray Binary LMC X-1

R. Cooke, J. Bland-Hawthorn, R. Sharp, Z. Kuncic

摘要:

在早期的一篇论文中,我们提出了第一个证据,证明在X射线双星LMC X-1周围有一个弓形激波星云,其尺度约为15 pc,我们认为它是由一个与吸积盘有关的喷流提供动力的。我们现在提出的第一个证据,电离锥延伸从一个X射线双星,一个现象,只有在活动星系核(AGN)的日期。在HeII 4686/Hbeta和[OIII]5007/Hbeta线比图中检测到的电离锥与从弓形激波星云推断出的喷流方向一致。圆锥体的开口角约为45度,径向范围约为3.8 pc。由于HeII的辐射不能用伴星O来解释,电离锥中的气体必须暴露在“裸露的”吸积盘中,从而使我们能够对不可观测的电离光谱加以限制。电离锥的能量学为LMC X-1中的“紫外软X射线”(XUV)过剩提供了明确的证据。任何试图将硬X射线光谱(> 1 keV)与传统的吸积盘模型相匹配的尝试都无法解释这种XUV成分。我们提出了两个可能的来源观察到的各向异性:(1)被尘埃环面,或(2)喷吹孔周围的包层的星周吸收材料的遮蔽。我们讨论了我们的发现的背景下,吸积到黑洞的质量标度假说的影响,并为未来的研究提出了途径。

英文摘要:

In an earlier paper, we presented the first evidence for a bow-shock nebula surrounding the X-ray binary LMC X-1 on a scale of ~15 pc, which we argued was powered by a jet associated with an accretion disk. We now present the first evidence for an ionization cone extending from an X-ray binary, a phenomenon only seen to date in active galactic nuclei (AGN). The ionization cone, detected in the HeII4686/Hbeta and [OIII]5007/Hbeta line ratio maps, aligns with the direction of the jet inferred from the bow-shock nebula. The cone has an opening angle ~45 deg and radial extent ~3.8 pc. Since the HeII emission cannot be explained by the companion O star, the gas in the ionization cone must be exposed to the `naked' accretion disk, thereby allowing us to place constraints on the unobservable ionizing spectrum. The energetics of the ionization cone give unambiguous evidence for an "ultraviolet - soft X-ray" (XUV) excess in LMC X-1. Any attempt to match the hard X-ray spectrum (>1keV) with a conventional model of the accretion disk fails to account for this XUV component. We propose two likely sources for the observed anisotropy: (1) obscuration by a dusty torus, or (2) a jet-blown hole in a surrounding envelope of circumstellar absorbing material. We discuss the implications of our discovery in the context of the mass-scaling hypothesis for accretion onto black holes and suggest avenues for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑