arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0809.1024stat.ME
收藏

分析过分散计数数据的似然法与非似然法的比较模拟研究

A simulation study comparing likelihood and non-likelihood approaches in analyzing overdispersed count data

Stanley Xu, Gary Grunwald, Richard Jones

摘要:

过度分散计数数据建模的可能性和非可能性的方法。似然方法包括具有三种分布的泊松混合,伽马分布、对数正态分布和逆高斯分布。非似然方法包括稳健三明治估计和拟似然。在这项模拟研究中,过分散的计数数据下的泊松混合伽马分布,对数正态分布和逆高斯分布进行了模拟,然后分析了五个似然和非似然方法。我们的研究结果表明:1)当计数数据轻度过度分散时,这五种方法在第一类错误率、主效应的标准误和经验功效方面几乎没有差异; 2)当计数数据非常过度分散时,这五种方法都不对模型误设具有鲁棒性(由第一类错误率、主效应的标准误和经验功效评估)。由于可能存在较高的第一类错误和不适当的功率水平,本模拟研究提出了使用非似然方法分析过度分散计数数据的警告。与非似然方法不同,似然方法允许基于似然比进行统计检验,并检查模型拟合,为功效和样本量计算提供基础。当使用似然方法时,我们建议比较似然值,以选择适当的参数方法来分析非常分散的计数数据。

英文摘要:

Overdispersed count data are modelled with likelihood and non-likelihood approaches. Likelihood approaches include the Poisson mixtures with three distributions, the gamma, the lognormal, and the inverse Gaussian distributions. Non-likelihood approaches include the robust sandwich estimator and quasilikelihood. In this simulation study, overdispersed count data were simulated under the Poisson mixtures with the gamma, the lognormal and the inverse Gaussian distributions, then analyzed with the five likelihood and non-likelihood approaches. Our results indicated that 1) when the count data are mildly overdispersed, there are virtually no differences in type I error rate, standard error of the main effect, and empirical power among the five methods; 2) when the count data are very overdispersed, none of these five approaches is robust to model misspecification as evaluated by type I error rate, standard error of the main effect, and empirical power. This simulation study raises caution on using non-likelihood method for analyzing very overdispered count data because of likely higher type I error and inappropriate power levels. Unlike non-likelihood approaches, likelihood approaches allow for statistical tests based on likelihood ratios and for checking model fit and provide basis for power and sample size calculations. When likelihood approaches are used, we suggest comparing likelihood values to select the appropriate parametric method for analyzing very overdispersed count data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑