arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0807.2592math.AT
收藏

代数与拓扑三角范畴

Algebraic versus topological triangulated categories

Stefan Schwede

AI总结:

本文对比了源自阿贝尔范畴的代数三角范畴与源自稳定同伦理论的拓扑三角范畴,指出两者在三角结构定义的某些性质上存在系统性差异,且这些差异均为挠现象,有理数上则无区别。

摘要:

最广为人知的三角范畴源于阿贝尔范畴中的链复形,通过过渡到链同伦类或反转拟同构而得到。这类例子被称为“代数的”,因为它们源自阿贝尔(或至少加性)范畴。稳定同伦理论通过截然不同的方式产生了三角范畴的例子,在此语境中,源范畴在过渡到态射的同伦类之前通常是非常“非加性的”。由于其起源,我将这些例子称为“拓扑三角范畴”。在这些扩展的演讲笔记中,我解释了这两类三角范畴之间的一些系统性差异。存在某些性质——完全用三角结构来定义——在所有代数例子中成立,但在某些拓扑例子中却失效。这些差异都是挠现象,而有理数上代数与拓扑三角范畴之间没有区别。

英文摘要:

The most commonly known triangulated categories arise from chain complexes in an abelian category by passing to chain homotopy classes or inverting quasi-isomorphisms. Such examples are called `algebraic' because they originate from abelian (or at least additive) categories. Stable homotopy theory produces examples of triangulated categories by quite different means, and in this context the source categories are usually very `non-additive' before passing to homotopy classes of morphisms. Because of their origin I refer to these examples as `topological triangulated categories'. In these extended talk notes I explain some systematic differences between these two kinds of triangulated categories. There are certain properties -- defined entirely in terms of the triangulated structure -- which hold in all algebraic examples, but which fail in some topological ones. These differences are all torsion phenomena, and rationally there is no difference between algebraic and topological triangulated categories.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑