arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0806.4849cond-mat.mtrl-sci
收藏

阳离子掺杂的LiMnO $_{2}$的相稳定性]{在GGA +U近似下阳离子掺杂的LiMnO $_{2}$的相稳定性

Phase stability of cation-doped LiMnO$_{2}$]{Phase stability of cation-doped LiMnO$_{2}$ within the GGA+U approximation

N. N. Shukla, S. Shukla, R. Prasad, R. Benedek

摘要:

对锂离子电池的候选阴极材料LiMn $_{1-x}$ M $_x$ O $_{2}$(其中($x=0.25$,M=Ni,Fe,Co,Mg))进行GGA+U近似内的第一原理密度泛函理论计算,以研究掺杂对单斜结构相对于层状菱面体结构的不稳定性的影响。这项工作的主要动机是确定在何种程度上的预测电子更现实的GGA+U治疗将不同于GGA内获得的。发现了一些显著的质的变化:对于菱形结构的原始体系,Mn离子在GGA+U中表现出高自旋态,而不是GGA中的低自旋(金属)态。掺杂的菱面体结构在GGA+U中是不稳定的,而不是像在GGA中那样是亚稳定的。在单斜结构中,GGA+U和GGA中的掺杂剂氧化态相同(三价Fe,二价Co,Ni)。Co和Ni离子在GGA+U中的自旋态比在GGA中的自旋态高。二价掺杂剂在GGA+U内比三价掺杂剂更大程度上使单斜结构不稳定,如从先前GGA计算所预期。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,GGA和GGA+U中计算的性质之间的相对接近的协议有时可能是误导,因为潜在的电子行为可能是深刻的不同。

英文摘要:

First principles density functional theory calculations within the GGA+U approximation were performed for LiMn$_{1-x}$M$_x$O$_{2}$, a candidate cathode material for lithium-ion batteries, with ($x=0.25$, M=Ni, Fe, Co, Mg), to investigate the effect of doping on the destabilization of the monoclinic structure relative to the layered rhombohedral structure. A primary motivation of this work was to determine to what extent the predictions of the electronically more realistic GGA+U treatment would differ from those obtained within the GGA. Several significant qualitative changes are found. For the pristine system in the rhombohedral structure, Mn ions show a high-spin state within GGA+U, rather than the low spin (metallic) state found in GGA. The doped rhombohedral structure is unstable within GGA+U, rather than metastable, as in GGA. In the monoclinic structure, the dopant oxidation states are the same (trivalent Fe, divalent Co, Ni) in GGA+U and GGA. Co and Ni ions show a higher spin state in GGA+U than in GGA. The divalent dopants destabilized the monoclinic structure to a greater extent than trivalent dopants within the GGA+U, as expected from previous GGA calculations. Overall, our results suggest that the relatively close agreement sometimes found between properties calculated within the GGA and GGA+U may be misleading, because the underlying electronic behaviors may be profoundly different.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑