arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0806.0250cs.AIcs.LOcs.SC
收藏

Checking the Quality of Clinical Guidelines using Automated Reasoning Tools

Institute for Computing and Information Sciences(计算与信息科学研究所);Radboud University Nijmegen(拉德堡德大学奈梅亨分校)

Arjen Hommersom, Peter J. F. Lucas, Patrick van Bommel

英文摘要:

Requirements about the quality of clinical guidelines can be represented by schemata borrowed from the theory of abductive diagnosis, using temporal logic to model the time-oriented aspects expressed in a guideline. Previously, we have shown that these requirements can be verified using interactive theorem proving techniques. In this paper, we investigate how this approach can be mapped to the facilities of a resolution-based theorem prover, Otter, and a complementary program that searches for finite models of first-order statements, Mace. It is shown that the reasoning required for checking the quality of a guideline can be mapped to such fully automated theorem-proving facilities. The medical quality of an actual guideline concerning diabetes mellitus 2 is investigated in this way.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑