arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0804.2006quant-ph
收藏

On the problem of completeness of QM: von Neumann against Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen

Andrei Khrennikov

英文摘要:

We performed a comparative analysis of the arguments of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen -- EPR, 1935 (against the completeness of QM) and the theoretical formalism of QM (due to von Neumann, 1932). We found that the EPR considerations do not match at all with the von Neumann's theory. Thus EPR did not criticize the real theoretical model of QM. The root of EPR's paradoxical conclusion on incompleteness of QM is the misuse of von Neumann's projection postulate. EPR applied this postulate to observables with degenerate spectra (which is totally forbidden by the axiomatics of QM).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑