思考是有害的：人类错误研究对电子表格研究与实践的启示
Thinking is Bad: Implications of Human Error Research for Spreadsheet Research and Practice
AI总结：
本文指出电子表格错误研究长期忽视人类错误研究成果，并基于该领域结论提出“思考有害”、电子表格并非错误根源以及减少错误极其困难等观点，为后续实证检验提供方向。
摘要：
在电子表格错误研究领域，学术界和从业者普遍忽视了一个世纪以来人类错误研究产生的丰富成果。这些成果可以提示减少错误的方法；我们可以通过实证来检验这些建议。此外，人类错误研究似乎表明，若干常见的减少错误的处方和期望很可能是错误的。人类错误研究的关键结论包括：思考是有害的，电子表格并非电子表格错误的原因，以及减少错误极其困难。
英文摘要：
In the spreadsheet error community, both academics and practitioners generally have ignored the rich findings produced by a century of human error research. These findings can suggest ways to reduce errors; we can then test these suggestions empirically. In addition, research on human error seems to suggest that several common prescriptions and expectations for reducing errors are likely to be incorrect. Among the key conclusions from human error research are that thinking is bad, that spreadsheets are not the cause of spreadsheet errors, and that reducing errors is extremely difficult.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
