术语与概念：本体术语学基础
Le terme et le concept : fondements d'une ontoterminologie
摘要：
本体的大多数定义，被视为“概念化的规范”，同意这样一个事实，即如果本体可以采取不同的形式，它必然包括术语的词汇表和与域的概念化有关的意义的一些规范。而领域知识主要通过科技文本来表达，我们希望从中提取一些有用的信息来构建本体。但就这么简单吗？在这篇文章中，我们将看到词汇结构，即由语言关系连接的单词网络，不一定与领域概念化相匹配。我们必须记住，编写文档是文本语言学的关注点，其中一个原则是文本的不完整性，而构建本体-被视为独立于任务的知识-关注的是基于形式语言而不是自然语言的概念化。然而，著名的萨皮尔和沃尔夫关于思维和语言相互依赖的假设也适用于形式语言。这意味着构建本体和定义概念的方式直接取决于所使用的形式语言;并且结果将不相同。引入本体术语的概念，可以考虑到认识论的原则，为正式的本体论建设。
英文摘要：
Most definitions of ontology, viewed as a "specification of a conceptualization", agree on the fact that if an ontology can take different forms, it necessarily includes a vocabulary of terms and some specification of their meaning in relation to the domain's conceptualization. And as domain knowledge is mainly conveyed through scientific and technical texts, we can hope to extract some useful information from them for building ontology. But is it as simple as this? In this article we shall see that the lexical structure, i.e. the network of words linked by linguistic relationships, does not necessarily match the domain conceptualization. We have to bear in mind that writing documents is the concern of textual linguistics, of which one of the principles is the incompleteness of text, whereas building ontology - viewed as task-independent knowledge - is concerned with conceptualization based on formal and not natural languages. Nevertheless, the famous Sapir and Whorf hypothesis, concerning the interdependence of thought and language, is also applicable to formal languages. This means that the way an ontology is built and a concept is defined depends directly on the formal language which is used; and the results will not be the same. The introduction of the notion of ontoterminology allows to take into account epistemological principles for formal ontology building.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
