arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0801.1234physics.gen-ph
收藏

贝尔定理,许多世界和向后时间物理学:不仅仅是解释的问题

Bell's Theorem, Many Worlds and Backwards-Time Physics: Not Just a Matter of Interpretation

Paul J. Werbos

摘要:

Clauser、Holt、Shimony和Horne的经典“贝尔定理”告诉我们,我们必须放弃以下至少一个:(1)客观实在(又名“隐变量”);(2)局部性;或(3)时间向前的宏观统计(又名“因果关系”)。正统的哥本哈根版本的物理学放弃了第一个。埃弗雷特和惠勒的多世界理论放弃了第二个。物理学的向后时间理论(BTP)放弃了第三个。与传统观点相反,经验证据强烈支持埃弗雷特惠勒而不是正统的哥本哈根。BTP有两个主要的变体--一个是多世界版本,另一个是以爱因斯坦的精神为基础的偏微分方程(PDE)的新古典版本。第2节讨论了根据BTP的量子测量,重点是我们如何在贝尔定理实验或霍金宇宙学测试中表示像偏振器这样的凝聚态物体。《倒计时电讯报》虽然是推测性的,但还是被讨论了。

英文摘要:

The classic "Bell's Theorem" of Clauser, Holt, Shimony and Horne tells us that we must give up at least one of: (1) objective reality (aka "hidden variables"); (2) locality; or (3) time-forwards macroscopic statistics (aka "causality"). The orthodox Copenhagen version of physics gives up the first. The many-worlds theory of Everett and Wheeler gives up the second. The backwards-time theory of physics (BTP) gives up the third. Contrary to conventional wisdom, empirical evidence strongly favors Everett-Wheeler over orthodox Copenhagen. BTP has two major variations -- a many-worlds version, and a neoclassical version of partial differential equations (PDE) in the spirit of Einstein. Section 2 discusses quantum measurement according to BTP, focusing on how we represent condensed matter objects like polarizers in a Bell's Theorem experiment or in tests of Hawking's cosmology. The Backwards Time Telegraph, though speculative, is discussed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑