arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0712.1652cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.soc-ph
收藏

关于“滴画与分形分析”的评论,arXiv:0710.4917 v2,K。琼斯-史密斯,H。Mathur和L.M. Krauss

Comment on "Drip Paintings and Fractal Analysis", arXiv:0710.4917v2, by K. Jones-Smith, H. Mathur and L.M. Krauss

A. P. Micolich, B. C. Scannell, M. S. Fairbanks, T. P. Martin, R. P. Taylor

摘要:

在最近的一份手稿(arXiv:0710.4917v2)中,Jones-Smith等人试图使用成熟的盒子计数技术进行分形分析,以“最终证明分形标准对认证没有用处”。在这里,为了回应我们认为是对琼斯-史密斯等人早期工作的极度简单化的歪曲,我们重申我们对分形分析在艺术品鉴定中的潜力的立场。我们还指出了一些缺陷中提出的分析琼斯-史密斯等人。

英文摘要:

In a recent manuscript (arXiv:0710.4917v2), Jones-Smith et al. attempt to use the well-established box-counting technique for fractal analysis to "demonstrate conclusively that fractal criteria are not useful for authentication". Here, in response to what we view to be an extremely simplistic misrepresentation of our earlier work by Jones-Smith et al., we reiterate our position regarding the potential of fractal analysis for artwork authentication. We also point out some of the flaws in the analysis presented in by Jones-Smith et al.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑