arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0705.0775physics.hist-phphysics.gen-ph
收藏

澄清爱因斯坦质能等效一阶导数从而否定艾夫斯的批评

Clarifying Einstein's First Derivation for Mass-Energy Equivalence and Consequently Making Ives's Criticism a Void

R. V. R. Pandya

摘要:

我们研究爱因斯坦(《物理学年鉴》,17,1905)首次推导质能等价时所考虑的物理情况。爱因斯坦介绍了一个常数$C$在他的推导和推理周围的$C$和方程包含$C$引起批评艾夫斯。在这里,我们澄清爱因斯坦的推导,并获得一个常数$C$的值。得到的零值$C$建议替代解释爱因斯坦的推导和艾夫斯的批评是无效的,本文也提出了细节。

英文摘要:

We study physical situation considered by Einstein (Ann. Physik, 17, 1905) for his first derivation of mass-energy equivalence. Einstein introduced a constant $C$ in his derivation and reasoning surrounding $C$ and equations containing $C$ caused criticism by Ives. Here we clarify Einstein's derivation and obtain a value for constant $C$. The obtained zero value for $C$ suggests alternative explanation for Einstein's derivation and makes Ives's criticism a void and for which details are also presented in this paper.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑