AI中文摘要
对于一般的 max-k-XORSAT($k \geq 3$),除非 $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$,否则在最坏情况实例上,没有多项式时间算法能显著优于随机猜测:超越随机赋值值 $1/2$ 的近似是 $\mathsf{NP}$-难的。当每个变量出现在至多 $D$ 个约束中时,情况发生变化。在该有界度设置中,多项式时间算法可以证明地以 $1/\sqrt{D}$ 量级的加性量击败随机基线。对于布尔实例,已知该标度是最优的:匹配的困难性结果归功于 Trevisan,而相应的算法保证由 Barak 等人建立。对于一般有限域是否同样成立,以及这对量子算法意味着什么,尚未确定。我们明确建立了这一联系,并将困难性扩展到有界度 $D$ 且任意有限域 $\mathbb{F}_q$ 上的 max-E$k$-LINSAT$(q,r)$,证明超过 $r/q + \mathcal{O}_{q,r}(1/\sqrt{D})$ 是 $\mathsf{NP}$-难的。这些结果为解码量子干涉测量(DQI)、QAOA 和经典启发式算法所针对的有界度实例提供了复杂度理论基准。因此,有界度实例上的任何量子优势仅限于常数前因子。我们进一步证明,在 DQI 背景下,对于 $(k,D)$-正则实例,该前因子对解码器的性质敏感:使用经典解码器的 DQI 面临信息论上的 $1/\sqrt{D \log D}$ 障碍,使其无法匹配困难性标度,而使用量子解码器的 DQI 与 $1/\sqrt{D}$ 标度兼容——这表明量子解码是使 DQI 匹配复杂度理论标度的关键要素。
英文摘要
For general max-k-XORSAT with $k \geq 3$, no polynomial-time algorithm can do substantially better than random guessing on worst-case instances unless $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$: approximating beyond the random-assignment value of $1/2$ is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. The picture changes when each variable appears in at most $D$ constraints. In that bounded-degree setting, polynomial-time algorithms can provably beat the random baseline by an additive amount of order $1/\sqrt{D}$. For Boolean instances, this scaling is known to be optimal: the matching hardness result is due to Trevisan, while the corresponding algorithmic guarantee was established by Barak et al. Whether the same holds over general finite fields, and what it implies for quantum algorithms, has not been established. We make this connection explicit and extend the hardness to max-E$k$-LINSAT$(q,r)$ with bounded degree $D$ and over arbitrary finite fields $\mathbb{F}_q$, proving that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to exceed $r/q + \mathcal{O}_{q,r}(1/\sqrt{D})$. These results provide the complexity-theoretic benchmark for the bounded-degree instances targeted by decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), QAOA, and classical heuristics. Any quantum advantage on bounded-degree instances is therefore confined to the constant prefactor. We further show that in the context of DQI and on $(k,D)$-regular instances, this prefactor is sensitive to the nature of the decoder: DQI with classical decoders faces an information-theoretic $1/\sqrt{D \log D}$ barrier that prevents it from matching the hardness scaling, while DQI with quantum decoders is compatible with the $1/\sqrt{D}$ scaling -- identifying quantum decoding as the key ingredient for matching the complexity-theoretic scaling with DQI.