AI中文摘要
市政机构越来越多地使用机器学习来盘点人行道、评分街景以及生成公共空间干预措施的可视化。这些系统产生的输出进入预算、设计迭代和公共论证,但关于包容性、安全性和归属感的判断仍然存在争议。本文提出了多元对齐城市主义(PAU),这是一个程序性治理框架,将公共空间AI系统视为公民基础设施,并为市政使用此类系统制定了程序性的AI权利。借鉴加拿大蒙特利尔社区组织的两个参与式案例研究,本文考察了分歧、亚组变异、有界预测缩放和中性偏好判断如何为市政AI治理提供信息。Street Review 引出居民对街景评估的标准,并训练了一个亚组感知缩放模型用于共同生产的判断,在保留测试集上实现了0.89的R²。LIVS(局部交叉视觉空间数据集)构建了多元偏好数据以对齐文本到图像模型,并将中性选择视为不确定性的证据。在这些案例中,分歧呈现结构性,审议改变了什么算作证据,缩放是可行的但受限于模态和覆盖范围,而中性则限制了偏好调整所能证明的内容。PAU将这些约束转化为一个市政治理架构,包括分类报告、版本化价值登记册、常设审议小组、采购条款以及定义的暂停和回滚权限。
英文摘要
Municipal agencies increasingly use machine learning to inventory sidewalks, score streetscapes, and generate visualizations of public-space interventions. These systems produce outputs that enter budgeting, design iteration, and public justification, yet judgments about inclusion, safety, and belonging remain contested. This paper proposes Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism (PAU), a procedural governance framework that treats public-space AI systems as civic infrastructure and formulates a procedural Right to AI for municipal uses of such systems. Drawing on two participatory case studies with community organizations in Montreal, Canada, the paper examines how disagreement, subgroup variation, bounded predictive scaling, and neutral preference judgments can inform municipal AI governance. Street Review elicits resident criteria for streetscape evaluation and trains a subgroup-aware scaling model for co-produced judgments, achieving an R2 of 0.89 on a held-out test set. LIVS, a Local Intersectional Visual Spaces dataset, constructs pluralistic preference data for aligning text-to-image models and treats neutral selections as evidence of indeterminacy. Across the cases, disagreement appears structured, deliberation changes what counts as evidence, scaling is feasible but limited by modality and coverage, and neutrality constrains what preference tuning can justify. PAU translates these constraints into a municipal governance architecture with disaggregated reporting, a versioned value register, standing deliberative cells, procurement clauses, and defined pause and rollback authority.