We propose a framework for designing Target-Date Funds (TDFs) around an explicit return objective while controlling risk directly at the portfolio level through a declining Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint. In this approach, the regulator or sponsor specifies a CVaR glidepath that gives the portfolio manager enough flexibility to reach a target return with a reasonably high probability. The target return is determined exogenously from pension-design inputs such as retirement age, contribution rate, working years, life expectancy, and replacement-rate goals. This differs from conventional TDF design, where age-dependent asset-class limits are set without an explicit link to a required return. A key feature of the method is that it does not assume the manager selects an optimal portfolio each period. Instead, each month the manager draws an allocation from the set of portfolios satisfying the CVaR constraint. This yields a conservative evaluation of each glidepath: success probabilities are averages over admissible allocations, rather than best-case outcomes. We introduce two figures of merit: the probability of meeting the target return and the cumulative risk assumed over the life of the TDF. As a proof of concept, we apply the framework to Chile's 2025 pension reform using nine Chilean and global asset classes and a 40-year accumulation horizon. The results show that the transition age at which risk starts to decline is the most consequential design parameter, and that contribution density acts as a hard constraint: below a critical threshold, portfolio design alone cannot compensate for structurally low contributions. The framework is general and can be applied to any TDF designed around an explicit return objective.

This paper analyses the distinction between educational and skill types of labour mismatch and their association with earnings. Drawing on cross-sectional data for 26 countries from the 1st Cycle of the OECD (2012) Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), I examine educational and skill mismatch using a comprehensive set of education- and skill-based indicators, explore heterogeneity across worker characteristics, and investigate the sources of conflicting country-level correlations with earnings through an error components model. The results show that country-level unobserved heterogeneity induces endogeneity bias, with both its direction and magnitude varying across mismatch measures. Once unobserved heterogeneity is controlled for, over-education and over-skilling are associated with wage penalties, whereas under-education and under-skilling are linked to wage premiums. These findings highlight both conceptual and empirical distinctions between educational and skill mismatch and demonstrate the importance of indicator choice in the analysis.

An important question for an algo trader working an order is to understand if their actions are moving the market against them -- i.e., causing market impact. The conventional answer usually is one of two: (i) monitor price slippage in real-time, potentially reducing adverse activity with increased slippage, or (ii) do away with dynamic trading adjustments and rely on semi-static rules based on ex-post estimates of slippage over a large sample of events. Realtime monitoring fails because reliably estimating slippage is statistically expensive -- it requires hundreds of fills before it can be told apart from background volatility. More fundamentally however, it does not establish causality. Observed adverse price moves may be caused by the trader's own actions, or by an unrelated participant competing for the same liquidity and capturing the same alpha. The optimal response (say, slow down vs.\ speed up) is opposite in the two cases. We propose a method that detects price impact, on a per-action basis, by measuring the timing synchronicity between a trader's actions and subsequent adverse market events. The method at heart is a test for statistical \emph{surprise} in the timing of adverse events post trader action. We must be clear in that we do make a leap of faith here and assume that surprisingly fast adverse market events are evidence of causation and that the action triggered them -- a direct signature of impact and information leakage. Validating it requires real execution data; we set out the empirical tests that would do so.

Who is exposed to generative AI in a developing-country labour market? We map three occupational AI-exposure indices to India's redesigned Periodic Labour Force Survey (2025) and document a steep caste gradient among 83,000 employed graduates: graduates from the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes are 0.24--0.37 standard deviations less exposed than upper-caste graduates within the same district. Two channels drive the gap: one in four SC and one in three ST graduates work in farm or elementary occupations untouched by AI, and those in white-collar work are underrepresented in managerial, software, and finance occupations. Because exposure commands a wage premium of up to 20 per cent, generative AI stands to widen, not narrow, India's caste earnings gap.

In the fall of 2020, neural-network methods produced a large improvement in chess engines that became freely and widely available. By the end of 2021, the monthly draw rate in classical chess had risen by about four percentage points, but the distribution of player ratings, which are commonly read as measures of playing strength, had changed little. Ratings, however, are a relative measure, built from results against other rated players rather than from an absolute scale of play quality, so an improvement shared broadly across players need not change their ratings. Using 3.9 million rated classical games from March 2015 to November 2023, we document that the increased draw rate remains after conditioning on both players' ratings, holds within repeated same-color matchups, is not a continuation of a pre-existing trend, and persists through the end of the sample. A linear transformation that maps post-Covid ratings to higher pre-Covid equivalents, with a larger gap at lower ratings, accounts for more than 90 percent of the post-minus-pre shift in the fitted draw, White-win, and Black-win probabilities. Players' ratings and ranks, by contrast, show no additional rank reshuffling and no general widening of within-group dispersion relative to the pre-Covid benchmark. We interpret these findings as consistent with adoption across rating levels, with larger rating-equivalent gains for lower-rated players.

Practitioners allocate capital with forecast-light rules such as equal weight, inverse volatility, risk parity, HRP, and return-adjusted HRP (RA-HRP). This paper develops \emph{Heuristic Portfolio Optimization} (HPO): an information-restricted projection of the Markowitz/tangency solution onto a stable rule class. The implied-return principle, $\mathbf{w}$ is maximum-Sharpe iff $\mathbfμ_e \propto \mathbfΣ\mathbf{w}$, gives closed-form optimality sets for leading heuristics and exposes the Schur-complement substitutions behind HRP. For RA-HRP, we introduce fixed-tree cluster-Sharpe recursion, unit-free HRP--RA-HRP interpolation, tangency conditions, conditional-risk splits, and pathwise/KL decompositions of weight distortion. First-order Sharpe calculus expresses the marginal value of return information as nodewise alphas against HRP and yields a linear KL trust budget. We formalize generic HPO maps, define the implied-return defect, prove that it equals squared Sharpe inefficiency, characterize tree-HPO coincidence by nodewise mass ratios, and give a bias--variance decomposition for estimated rules. Finally, HPO is embedded into Reinforcement Learning Portfolio Optimization (RLPO): every HPO map induces a deterministic stationary policy; static HPO is the $γ=0$ no-friction face of the Bellman problem; RA-HRP supplies a hierarchical policy prior; and dynamic improvement is warranted when continuation value exceeds myopic HPO defect plus frictions. A performance-difference identity prices the myopic value gap, gives an $\varepsilon/(1-γ)$ myopia bound, and identifies nodewise alphas as policy-gradient coordinates of the hierarchical actor. Thus HPO is the static optimality layer and RLPO the dynamic control layer. The conditions are GRS-testable, extend to mean--CVaR and expected utility under ellipticity, and become Kelly-growth conditions in diffusion limits.

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly assist human experts, but the consequences of AI assistance on productivity can be heterogeneous. Caplin, Deming, S. Li, Martin, Marx, Weidmann, and Ye (2025b) provide evidence that two characteristics, ability and belief calibration, help to determine the returns to AI assistance. This note shows that their results replicate to a setting where professional radiologists analyze chest X-rays with access to state-of-the-art machine learning predictions. I leverage the public Collab-CXR data repository described by Moehring, Kutwal, Huang, Banerjee, Jacobi, Eber, Mendoza, Chung, Dayan, Gupta, Bui, Truong, Pareek, Langlotz, Lungren, Agarwal, Rajpurkar, and Salz (2025) and first analyzed for human-AI collaboration by Agarwal, Moehring, Rajpurkar, and Salz (2023). To faithfully reproduce the analysis in Caplin, Deming, S. Li, Martin, Marx, Weidmann, and Ye (2025b), I use the radiologist assessments from the repeated-case designs, which include 68 radiologists and 11,420 paired radiologist-patient-pathology observations. The results of this replication support the external validity of their core findings: lower baseline ability and higher calibration predict larger incremental value from AI.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for tasks once reserved for trained researchers, including hypothesis generation, specification choice, and drafting conclusions. We argue that the reliability of AI-assisted research depends not only on model capability, but also on how cognitive labour is structured between humans and machines. We study this problem through Human-in-the-Loop Economic Research (HLER), a decision architecture based on pre-commitment, decision sequencing, accountability, and attention allocation. In a pre-specified 2*4 factorial experiment with 280 complete research runs across four datasets, an unconstrained multi-agent baseline produced critical failures in 72% of runs. Using the same underlying model, the same agent decomposition, and identical prompts for the shared reasoning agents, HLER reduced the failure rate to 16% by imposing three architectural commitments: LLMs reason but do not execute data work, data and estimation are handled deterministically, and three human decision gates bind the workflow. Fisher's exact test rejects equality of failure rates at p<0.001. Reliability gains were largest on the least publicly represented dataset, a Qing-dynasty population register, consistent with a task-based production model with Frechet-distributed output quality. An 80-run ablation suggests that deterministic computation and human gates contribute independently, with exploratory evidence of complementarity. We interpret HLER as a research harness rather than an autonomous AI scientist: it sharply reduces failures, makes residual weaknesses more visible, and prevents unreliable claims from being advanced as publication-ready outputs.

As the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) approaches, the global semiconductor value chain faces growing structural tensions between regulatory transparency and data sovereignty. This article proposes a RegTech reference architecture using the International Data Spaces (IDSA) framework to orchestrate trustworthy environmental telemetry across the semiconductor-petrochemical nexus. The framework distinguishes the mandatory CBAM requirements from voluntary Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) frameworks, while addressing the additive complexities of the Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD) framework. Moving beyond standard linear technology stacks, we introduce a prospective roadmapping methodology that transforms upstream physical vulnerabilities into circular, negative feedback loops. Focusing on the Taipei and Penang technology corridor, the article details how sovereign data exchange enables Digital Product Passports (DPPs) to drive Global Business Services (GBSs) capability demands. Finally, we discuss the integration of Agentic AI for autonomous compliance and FinTech green financing, providing a scalable blueprint for global industrial clusters to achieve sovereign, sustainable, and transparent value chains.

Global Business Services (GBS) have emerged as a "living laboratory" for the Twin Transition of Green and Digital Transformation, as multinational corporations (MNCs) face increasing pressure to harmonize digital efficiency with environmental stewardship. Aiming to derive a socio-technical framework, this paper synthesizes Technology Roadmapping (TRM) with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) ICT-centric innovation ecosystem toolkit. A bibliometric analysis of research clusters reveals an evolutionary shift from basic process automation toward "Sustainable Intelligence," identifying the GBS unit as a central "operational airlock" that mediates between landscape pressures -- such as the EU's dual mandate and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms -- and niche innovations in AI-native workflows. The study further maps these clusters onto a stakeholder engagement canvas, highlighting how resilient "Middle Power" hubs in Poland, Portugal, and Malaysia are bypassing the middle-income trap to provide a "third way" for global value chains amidst a bifurcated geopolitical cloud. The results offer a data-driven design approach for leaders and entrepreneurial support networks to orchestrate talent and supply chain flows, thereby enriching the conceptual understanding of Industry 5.0 and the role of GBS as a primary mechanism for navigating a volatile, multipolar digital economy.

We study a forward-time formulation of the Black-Scholes equation with state-dependent volatility. In contrast to the classical terminal-value pricing problem, where the option payoff is prescribed at maturity and the price is computed backward in time, the present problem prescribes the current option-price profile and seeks to recover the option-price profile at the expiration date T. This formulation is ill-posed, since the equation evolves in the unstable direction of the parabolic operator and high-frequency perturbations in the initial data may be strongly amplified. To address this difficulty, we introduce a price-dimensional reduction based on shifted Legendre polynomials. The original Black-Scholes equation is projected onto a finite-dimensional Legendre basis in the asset-price variable, leading to a system of ordinary differential equations in time for the expansion coefficients. This reduction acts as a spectral cutoff and also relaxes the degeneracy caused by the factor S^2 at the zero-price boundary. The main reconstruction method is a dimension-reduced Legendre--Tikhonov method. We prove existence, uniqueness, data stability, and convergence for each fixed truncation level. We also include a reduced PINN solver as a secondary computational comparison after the Legendre reduction. Numerical experiments with smooth, butterfly-spread, and European put payoffs show that the Legendre--Tikhonov method recovers the terminal option-price profile from noisy initial data, while the reduced PINN solver provides a useful additional benchmark. Comparisons with the conventional physical-space quasi-reversibility method demonstrate the stabilizing effect of the Legendre reduction.

We show that persistent dynamics of a latent default-probability path can generate effective default correlation through temporal coarse-graining. In the OU--Binomial baseline, monthly defaults are conditionally independent given this latent path, but aggregating monthly default probabilities into long-horizon probabilities induces a scale-dependent effective mixing distribution for aggregated default counts. Applied to corporate default-count data, this mechanism explains long-horizon overdispersion, autocorrelation, and the emergence of effective default correlation. We then examine Davis--Lo-type contagion and Vasicek-type common-factor extensions. Direct fitting at each aggregation scale assigns increasing residual covariance shares to instantaneous dependence, but worsens the per-block expected log predictive density. In contrast, when monthly posterior latent paths are first coarse-grained and residual-dependence parameters are estimated conditional on these paths, the residual covariance contributions remain small while the predictive density improves. Thus, temporal coarse-graining provides a scale-consistent baseline that regularizes the attribution of variance and improves identifiability by suppressing the over-allocation of long-horizon fluctuations to contagion or asset-correlation parameters.

Maritime chokepoints concentrate shipping traffic. Disruptions to this traffic can have a widespread impact on the global economy. However, the way in which these impacts are shaped by the shipping sector's adaptive behavior is not well understood. Here, we introduce an empirically calibrated full-scale agent-based model of the global commercial shipping fleet, representing 35,954 active ships moving among 1,651 ports. We use the model to quantify how rerouting changes arrival losses under chokepoint closures. Static route exposure alone does not predict realized losses. In the adaptive model, rerouting reduces losses at some directly exposed ports, while delayed vessel cycles create losses at later port calls and in dependent regions. Cumulative net shipping-day losses therefore continue to rise with closure duration because longer routes keep ships delayed after the initial adjustment. Each additional closure day reduces global shipping arrivals by 3.0% for Suez and 7.7% for simultaneous Suez, Panama, and Malacca closures. These losses are unevenly distributed in exposed regions and ports. Disruptions with known duration show different loss profiles from unexpected shocks with unknown duration, revealing that end-date information can reduce avoidable short-run losses. The results show that chokepoint risk is a dynamic problem of routing, timing, and regional exposure and not a static property of maritime-network topology.

Ship finance is a data-intensive and document-heavy segment of asset-based lending, requiring the integration of financial, technical, contractual, and regulatory information from heterogeneous and largely unstructured sources. Increasing environmental regulation and ESG reporting requirements are adding further complexity to underwriting and loan-origination processes. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), create new opportunities for processing and analysing such information. This paper reviews potential applications of AI in ship finance, with a particular focus on LLM-based systems for document comprehension, information extraction, and workflow automation. We present ShipFinance.ai, a modular agentic architecture to support loan application workflows in ship finance. The proposed system combines an LLM-based extraction module, financial analysis components, external maritime data services, and a controlled document-generation module with a chatbot interface to support the preparation of standardized financing applications. The paper discusses the key challenges for using such models in production. We argue that AI-assisted systems can support maritime finance professionals in managing increasingly complex information and reporting requirements.

In this paper we study optimal exit strategies of gamblers with cumulative prospect theory (CPT) preferences in games where the expected payoff is strictly negative at each play, and formulate the problem as optimal stopping on asymmetric random walks. Applying a geometric transformation of the underlying cumulative gain/loss process, engaging randomized strategies and changing the decision variable from stopping times to probability distribution of the accumulated gain or loss at exit time, we solve the problem via the Skorokhod embedding. Drastically different from the fair gamble problem studied by He et al. (2019a), we show that the unfair problem in the infinite time horizon has finite values for a wide range of CPT parameter specifications. We then present the analytical solutions in the case of piece-wise power utility and power probability distortion functions. Compared to the strategies used in fair gambling, the CPT gamblers in unfair gambles are less loss-tolerant and choose not to gamble at all when the games are sufficiently unfavorable.

Frontier AI systems are bridging the gap between intelligence and utility by shifting from conversational assistants to autonomous agents that execute tasks end to end. Using production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, we study this transition by examining how AI agents accelerate and reshape knowledge work. Three key empirical findings emerge. First, using sessions with near-identical initial query pairs as natural experiments for the same underlying task attempted with both products, Computer performs 26 minutes of autonomous work per user session, versus 33 seconds for Search. Computer automates task decomposition and execution that Search users might otherwise manually orchestrate and implement. As a result, Computer shifts follow-up query distribution toward higher-order work such as verification and extension. Autonomy also increases execution quality, with per-query dissatisfaction rates 55% lower on Computer than on Search. Second, due to its autonomy advantage, Computer reduces completion time from 269 to 36 minutes on matched tasks, lowering estimated time and cost by 87% and 94%, respectively, compared to humans equipped with Search alone. Third, Computer changes the scope of work that users attempt: Computer queries more often cross occupational boundaries, require higher-order cognition, draw on broader expertise, take the form of composite tasks that bundle interdependent subtasks into a single query, and unlock work activities that are essentially absent from Search usage among the same users. Together, the evidence indicates that AI agents accelerate workflows, enhance output quality, reduce costs, and expand the breadth and depth of automated work.

This paper develops a unified explicit solution theory for optimal execution through sequential limit-order placement in a limit order book. Rather than controlling only the trading speed of a metaorder, we determine how individual limit orders should be quoted over time. The model incorporates signal-dependent drift, price impact, inventory risk, and execution risk, with fills modeled by point processes whose intensities depend on the submitted quotes. We formulate four execution criteria: expected terminal wealth, expected terminal wealth with running inventory penalty, CARA utility of terminal wealth, and CARA utility with running inventory penalty. For general price-impact and inventory-penalty functions, we derive the corresponding HJB equations and show that all four problems reduce to a triangular finite-dimensional structure which can be solved explicitly, leading to fully explicit value functions and optimal quotes across all cases. We also prove well-posedness, admissibility, and verification results. The explicit formulas reveal connections between quoting strategies under different criteria, support long-horizon asymptotic analysis, and show numerically that signal-dependent drift can substantially affect optimal execution.

We study risk-neutral density extraction from short-dated option chains. As expiry approaches, option premia decline and bid--ask spreads can be large relative to prices, making mid quotes particularly uninformative. Stale or asynchronous quotes may also generate potential static arbitrages, rendering standard procedures infeasible or unstable. We develop a model-free pipeline that treats bid-ask quotes as the primitive market constraint. The pipeline consists of two steps. First, a procedure called ``Arbitrage Removal Iterative Executable Strategy'' (ARIES) filters executable static arbitrage at quoted bid and ask prices under market-depth constraints. Second, the ``Smooth Entropic Density EXtraction'' (SEDEx) then recovers the density through a criterion leveraging smoothness and entropy under bid-ask constraints. We test the pipeline on synthetic Heston panels and short-dated SPX option data, sampled from a few hours to one week before expiry. Computation is fast and returns robust densities across various market conditions, including scheduled macroeconomic announcements. As an empirical application, we use the recovered densities to construct short dated implied-volatility smiles.

The excess growth rate, defined as the gap in Jensen's inequality for the logarithm, is a fundamental functional in portfolio theory. In this paper, we present a mathematical study motivated by information theory. We begin by establishing its properties and showing that it has rich connections with information theoretic concepts such as the Helmholtz free energy, L. Campbell's measure of average code length and large deviations. Our main results consist of three axiomatic characterization theorems of the excess growth rate, in terms of (i) the relative entropy, (ii) the gap in Jensen's inequality, and (iii) the logarithmic divergence that generalizes the Bregman divergence. Furthermore, we study maximization of the excess growth rate and compare it with the growth optimal portfolio. Our results not only provide theoretical justifications of the significance of the excess growth rate, but also establish new connections between information theory and quantitative finance.

Government trust, as a core concept in political economy and public policy research, serves as a fundamental cornerstone of democratic legitimacy and state capacity. This paper examines how environmental conditions, particularly sunlight efficiency, influence reported government trust through both affective and cognitive mechanisms. Leveraging World Values Survey Wave 7 data merged with NASA POWER high-frequency weather data, we propose and validate a novel ``salience and attribution'' mechanism: clearer skies may paradoxically reduce government trust by heightening environmental awareness and triggering negative attributions. We further identify potential mediating pathways, including subjective well-being, political interest, political discussion, and health perception, and demonstrate that environmental conditions introduce measurement error in survey-based trust indicators. Our findings provide theoretical contributions to environmental psychology, behavioral political economy, and survey methodology, and yield practical implications for governance, policy design, and survey

In this study, MLP models with dynamic structure are applied to factor models for asset pricing tasks. Concretely, the MLP pyramid model structure was employed on firm characteristic-sorted portfolio factors for modelling the large-cap US stocks. It was further developed as a practical factor investing strategy based on the predictions. The main findings were evaluated from 2 angles: model predictive power and backtesting performance, which were compared for the periods with and without COVID-19. The empirical results indicated that, given the constraints of the data size, the MLP models no longer perform 'deeper, better' in terms of predictive power, whereas the proposed MLP models with 2 and 3 hidden layers have greater flexibility in modelling the factors in this case. This study also verified the idea from previous work that MLP models for factor investing are more meaningful for downside risk control than for pursuing absolute annual returns.

The global momentum towards establishing sustainable energy systems has become increasingly prominent. Hydrogen, as a remarkable carbon-free and renewable energy carrier, has been endorsed by 39 countries at COP28 in the UAE, recognizing its essential role in global energy transition and industry decarbonization. Both the European Union (EU) and China are at the forefront of this shift, developing hydrogen strategies to enhance regional energy security and racing for carbon neutrality commitments by 2050 for the EU and 2060 for China. The wide applications of hydrogen across hard-to-abate sectors and the flexibility of decentralized production and storage offer customized solutions utilizing local resources in a self-paced manner. To unveil the trajectory of hydrogen development in China and the EU, this paper proposes a comparative analysis framework employing key factors to investigate hydrogen developments in both economic powerhouses. Beyond country-wise statistics, it dives into representative hydrogen economic areas in China (Inner Mongolia, Capital Economic Circle, Yangtze River Delta) and Europe (Delta Rhine Corridor) for understanding supply and demand, industrial synergy, and policy incentives for local hydrogen industries. The derived implications offer stakeholders an evolving hydrogen landscape across the Eurasian continent and insights for future policy developments facilitating the global green transition.