(Gen)AI diversity is not merely an ethical issue. From the perspective of geographic information science (GIScience), it could be interpreted as a function of uncertainty and as a form of cognitive bias, embedded in AI outputs. Recent work has sought to develop information-theoretic diversity measures and apply them to evaluate AI-chatbot outputs in a geographic context. As the AI ecosystem to which we are exposed on a daily basis becomes rapidly multimodal, we believe it is important to examine geographic diversity across various modalities. Focusing on images, this paper aims to fill this research gap. First, we select the GPT and DALL-E models as state-of-the-art examples and point out how assessing their geographic diversity involves various stages, including prompt revision and image generation. Then, taking inspiration from species diversity measures in ecological research, we incorporate similarity weighting into the measurement of geographic diversity. Next, we demonstrate how to evaluate geographic diversity in image generation through a case study. Our analysis reveals several counterintuitive findings. For instance, older models can exhibit greater geographic diversity despite producing lower-quality images, and prompt revision yields greater geographic diversity than image generation. At the same time, we observe explicit model homogeneity underlying the lack of geographic diversity, as the selected models consistently depict the same prototypical geo-specific feature or similar features. This is concerning, as it risks producing stereotypical representations of places.

Among the many challenges hindering the responsible development and deployment of AI, arguably none has faced more intense scrutiny than bias in its various forms. This underscores the widespread concerns across AI researchers that model outputs, e.g., from generative AI, may encode structural distributional imbalances (stemming from training data or model design) that may amplify social inequality or introduce systemic distortions across application domains ranging from biodiversity to disaster mitigation. Yet, relatively little work has investigated the geographical nature of bias or developed measurable benchmarks for what it means for (generative) AI to be unbiased. In this chapter, we investigate this issue through a literature review. As foundation models are reshaping the landscape of bias research, we examine work spanning both the pre-generative AI and generative AI periods. First, we identify a range of geographic biases. These biases span from representation bias in the training data and regional disparities in the factual recall of language models to the tendency of generative AI to over-proportionally favor prototypical places (called defaults). Then, we showcase how recent studies address the latter bias by evaluating geographic diversity in the outputs of generative AI across various cognitive levels, parameter settings, and output modalities.

Mass gathering events are associated with critical safety incidents caused by insufficient crowd monitoring and inadequate emergency response coordination. Traditional surveillance systems lack intelligent analytics, resulting in delayed threat identification, poor resource deployment, and weak support for vulnerable individuals during dense public assemblies. This paper presents Drishti AI-Event Guardian, an intelligent crowd management framework using deep learning for public safety enhancement. The architecture combines multimodal data from CCTV networks and UAV platforms, processed by models on Google Vertex AI infrastructure. Core methods include real-time crowd density estimation using YOLOv8, spatiotemporal anomaly detection, and predictive crowd-flow modeling through gradient-boosted regression. Drishti also integrates four modules: (i) facial recognition for missing person identification with crowd-wide notification; (ii) medical emergency reporting with automated dispatch; (iii) a conversational AI chatbot for reports and complaints; and (iv) an intelligent guard reallocation engine that dynamically reassigns personnel in response to crowd density changes. The system is evaluated on two scenarios: the Kumbh Mela gathering and the RCB Victory Parade event, achieving crowd density estimation MAE of 3.2 persons/m2, anomaly detection F1-score of 0.91, facial recognition precision of 0.93, and median alert latency of 111 ms. Predictive congestion modeling provides five-minute forecasts with MAPE of 8.3%, enabling preemptive intervention. The chatbot resolved 89% of incident filings without human operators, while guard reallocation reduced responder deployment latency by 34% versus manual reassignment. Results demonstrate a shift from passive surveillance toward active crowd intelligence and scalable foundation for events from local gatherings to mega festivals.

As AI-driven product development accelerates, the bottleneck is shifting from how we build to what we build. Traditional human brainstorming faces challenges including groupthink, echo chambers, and limited diversity. To address this, we present a multi-agentic architecture that simulates roundtable brainstorming through two phases: divergent thinking to generate diverse ideas, and convergent thinking to evaluate and rank the most promising ones. The system employs diverse AI personas that engage in roundtable discussions, guided by an agentic facilitator that steers the discussion toward productive outcomes. Personas maintain private thoughts while commenting publicly, with ideas emerging organically throughout the discussion. Per-persona quotas on idea submissions and votes promote balanced participation while producing natural rankings. Throughout the session, the system tracks each idea's lineage, capturing how concepts originate and cross-pollinate over time. We demonstrate this approach through a case study generating consumer ideas for AI smart glasses, showing (i) it produces diverse, relevant ideas with insights into their evolution; (ii) the cumulative exchange of perspectives across personas cultivates a shared context that progressively deepens the quality of discussion and the ideas produced.

Diffusion-based image editing has achieved strong visual fidelity under natural language instructions, yet most existing systems still operate at the level of surface instruction following, without reasoning about the implicit contextual constraints embedded in real user requests. This often leads to visually plausible but logically inconsistent edits. In this work, we introduce RE-Edit, a benchmark for REasoning-aware image Editing that evaluates image editing systems across five complementary reasoning dimensions: physical, environmental, cultural, causal, and referential. RE-Edit comprises 1,000 carefully curated samples, each designed such that visual plausibility alone is insufficient and correct editing requires satisfying implicit logical constraints. To support fine-grained analysis, we establish dimension-aligned evaluation criteria and conduct a comprehensive study of ten open-source and two commercial image editing models. Our results show that even advanced systems frequently struggle with implicit multi-dimensional reasoning despite producing high-quality visuals. We further present a lightweight reasoning-guided post-edit baseline as an initial exploration, illustrating how inserting explicit reasoning can help mitigate such failures in a model-agnostic manner.

Realism is a central yet seemingly under-theorized concept in Agent-Based Modelling. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review, aiming to identify how realism is currently operationalized and demonstrated. The results show that realism is often poorly defined and lacks a consistent conceptual framework. A wide variety of methods are used to achieve and demonstrate realism, but explanations of whether and why these methods are appropriate for their intended purposes are generally limited. Building on this review, we introduce the Reality Anchor, Input, Output (RAINO) framework. RAINO identifies the key structures used to argue for realism in Agent-Based Models, consisting of Reality Anchors (e.g., empirical data, formal theory, expert knowledge, common-sense expectations) and their application as model Input or Output. RAINO broadens existing perspectives on how realism is framed. It explains why different assessors may evaluate the realism of a model in different ways, and it shows how this broader framing can lead to significantly different approaches to model development.

Low-density EEG is more suitable for wearable and IoT-based brain sensing, but sparse electrode sampling often lacks sufficient spatial information to characterize cross-regional neural activity. EEG spatial super-resolution aims to recover dense-channel EEG from sparse recordings, yet remains challenging because channel missingness typically occurs at the whole-channel level, spatiotemporal dependencies over the full electrode layout are often underexplored, and the mapping from sparse to dense signals is inherently ambiguous. To address these issues, we propose TGSD, a topology-guided state-space diffusion framework for EEG spatial super-resolution. TGSD first employs a Hierarchical Spatial Prior Encoder to learn topology-aware priors over the complete electrode layout by integrating local geometric relationships with region-level contextual information. Based on these priors and sparse observations, a Conditional State-Space Diffusion Reconstructor progressively generates missing-channel signals through reverse diffusion, while alternating temporal and channel-wise state-space modeling captures long-range temporal dynamics and inter-channel dependencies in a unified framework. Experiments on the SEED and PhysioNet MM/I datasets show that TGSD consistently outperforms representative baselines under different super-resolution factors in both reconstruction fidelity and downstream classification performance. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining topology-aware spatial priors with conditional diffusion for enhancing practical low-density EEG sensing in wearable and IoT scenarios. The official implementation code is available at https://github.com/jtggz/TGSD.

A recurring data mining task in complex networks is to determine how individual nodes contribute to system behavior. Existing approaches rely on either static-graph centralities or control-theoretic quantities such as controllability Gramians, which assume linear, time-invariant dynamics. Estimated systems, however, are typically nonlinear and time-varying. We define "emergent contribution (EC)," a finite-horizon measure of a node's dynamical leverage: the metric-weighted energy of its impulse response accumulated along the system trajectory. Computed from the Jacobians of any differentiable model, EC is estimator-agnostic and reduces exactly to average controllability in the linear, time-invariant limit. Our contribution is a characterization of when the two measures agree and diverge. Using a controlled synthetic family with known ground-truth contribution, we construct a phase diagram spanning nonlinearity, regime structure, persistence, and perturbation amplitude. EC and average controllability agree under static or smoothly drifting dynamics and both track ground truth. Divergence emerges under persistent regime switching, is strongest under persistent sign reversal, and disappears when the sign reversal is removed. At extreme perturbation amplitudes, both measures degrade, identifying the limits of local linearization. We place five estimated real systems from several domains within this phase space. Their placement serves as a diagnostic of when EC provides information beyond static controllability and therefore justifies its additional computational cost. On one panel examined in depth, a twenty-seed retraining ensemble reveals a robust variance--leverage dissociation: nodes whose perturbations propagate widely despite low within-system variance, which is not recovered by static centralities nor variance-based summaries.

Sequential recommendation systems are widely adopted but often deployed as black-box APIs, which has driven recent interest in model extraction to replicate their capabilities locally. However, the long-tail distribution induces severe signal heterogeneity: dense head sequences trigger the solidification of teacher preference, biasing extraction toward local patterns, while sparse tail sequences yield flat, noisy predictions. Existing one-size-fits-all extraction overlooks this disparity, resulting in noise overfitting and suboptimal knowledge transfer. We propose BAHSD, a black-box adaptive distillation framework that handles signal heterogeneity via a multi-scale consistency probing mechanism to implicitly quantify signal reliability. Based on this, an adaptive hierarchical objective is designed: dynamic-temperature KL divergence mitigates preference solidification for high-confidence signals, while ranking consistency and InfoNCE contrastive learning provide noise-robust enhancement for low-confidence signals. BAHSD consistently outperforms baselines, achieving up to 4.98\% gain over the teacher and 80\%+ improvement on tail users, offering a plug-and-play solution for high-fidelity black-box recommendation extraction.

Enterprise multi-agent systems increasingly expose multiple coordination patterns, but deployments often lack evidence for when to use consensus, debate, synthesis, or a simpler single-agent workflow. This paper evaluates whether coordination strategy should be selected dynamically by problem class rather than fixed globally. We run a frozen matrix of 30 enterprise tasks spanning six industries, five problem classes, four execution conditions, three replications per cell, and four model arms: qwen_local, sonnet, gemma_openrouter, and an auxiliary openai cloud-validation arm. All 1,440 generated outputs are judged by a fixed Sonnet rubric. The main finding is bounded and operationally useful, but it is not the original strict H1. The pre-registered exact-winner/CI criterion is not supported: exact winner identity is unstable across model arms, and several predicted strategies are close to, but not above, the best observed alternative. A weaker near-best routing claim is strongly supported. In every pre-registered model arm and problem class, and again in the auxiliary OpenAI validation arm, the predicted strategy is within 0.10 quality-score points of the best observed condition. Structured compliance verification is the clearest exception to the original mapping: all arms favor single_agent rather than consensus. A pre-registered Kendall's W test finds no reliable difference between Vietnamese-domain and English-domain tasks in how consistently the four coordination conditions are ranked (mean W of 0.20 in both strata; signed-rank p = .85), so H2 is not supported. We conclude that enterprise coordination policy should use dynamic routing as a calibrated default, not as a deterministic winner-selection law.

Gradient-flow optimization is usually viewed as an algorithmic procedure for minimizing empirical loss, with training duration selected by validation or heuristic early-stopping rules. We develop a statistical inference framework for the gradient-flow training trajectory itself. The central object is fixed-operator squared-error gradient flow: whenever the fitted value evolves through a time-invariant positive semidefinite training operator, the trained model output at each training time is exactly equivalent to the best linear unbiased predictor, or empirical-Bayes posterior mean, under a corresponding random-effects model. Under this representation, training time becomes a variance-component parameter governing how variance is reallocated from residual noise to structured signal. This turns two basic training decisions into inferential problems. First, whether training is needed is formulated as a variance-component test for signal beyond initialization. Second, how long to train is formulated as restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of the training-time variance component. The resulting REML-guided early stopping rule has a spectral interpretation: it selects the training time at which optimized spectral losses become empirically decorrelated from the eigenvalues of the training operator, yielding an effective degrees-of-freedom measure for the evolving trained model. We establish asymptotic prediction optimality for fixed-design in-sample risk and, under additional kernel regularity conditions, random-design out-of-sample risk. Deep learning models in fixed-kernel gradient regimes provide canonical modern-AI instantiations of the theory. Numerical experiments and a UK Biobank proteomics application show that the proposed inferential approach attains competitive prediction accuracy while reducing the reliance on validation splits and repeated checkpoint evaluation.

Density functional theory (DFT) serves as the basis for computational discovery in materials science and chemistry, yet each calculation demands extensive human effort: adjusting algorithms when convergence stalls, revising plans when unexpected physics emerges, and inserting steps as intermediate results reshape the problem. Existing LLM-based agents automate only the initial planning stage, producing a full execution plan upfront and leaving all subsequent adaptation to hand-crafted rules. As a result, these workflows remain fragile, do not generalize well beyond pre-planned scenarios, and often require expert intervention when failures or unexpected intermediate results require changes to the calculation path. Here, we introduce AutoDFT, a closed-loop multi-agent framework that embeds LLM reasoning into every stage of the DFT lifecycle, where a strategic planner produces a skeletal plan of step objectives; a step planner generates numerical parameters just in time from preceding results; and a monitor-recover-reflect cycle diagnoses failures, repairs them, and revises the plan when the evidence justifies it. We demonstrate both breadth and depth: breadth on VASPBench, a purpose-built benchmark spanning 34 tasks and 9 DFT calculation types, where AutoDFT achieves 94.1% task-level success with GPT-5.2; and depth on established materials databases, where AutoDFT produces quantitatively reliable property predictions across electronic, magnetic, and energetic properties. By closing the loop between planning and execution, AutoDFT enables experimentalists without deep computational expertise to obtain reliable first-principles results.

The Random Gradient hyper-heuristic was recently shown to be able to learn the optimal neighbourhood size when optimizing the LeadingOnes benchmark via the Randomised Local Search (RLS) meta-heuristic. However, for this to happen, a learning period of a certain length $τ$ had to be used, differently from classic hyper-heuristics, which change their behaviour based on the success of only the previous iteration. In this paper, we show how to automatically set this new parameter value, relieving the user from the non-trivial task of controlling this novel algorithm parameter. We prove that the resulting hyper-heuristic selects the optimal neighbourhood size in a $1-o(1)$ fraction of the iterations and, consequently, optimises the LeadingOnes benchmark in the best possible time (apart from lower-order terms) achievable with these neighborhood sizes.

Coding agents increasingly act as codebase-scale collaborators that can assist with codebase conversion, but this progress has exposed a critical weakness: agents often over-trust their own local validation routines and declare success on artifacts that satisfy surface checks while violating the semantic contracts users actually care about. This problem is especially acute in codebase conversion, where prior evaluation is largely outcome-driven and therefore unstable: two implementations can match on a shallow outcome, such as a single forward loss, while diverging in gradients, optimizer behavior, or short-horizon training dynamics. We introduce T2J-Bench, a benchmark for codebase conversion that reformulates conversion as transfer under a fixed equivalence contract. A fixed verifier then compares source and converted codebases through three ordered stages: Spec (interface admissibility), Numeric (forward outputs, losses, gradients, and objective-specific tensors), and Behavioral (short training dynamics under fixed seeds). Across 355 blind conversion attempts, the best system reaches only 26.7--28.9% overall pass rate despite Spec pass rates up to 91.1%; a 4.7x token-budget spread yields only a 2.2x pass-rate spread; and all systems overestimate success by 66.6--97.8 points relative to the fixed evaluator. This suggests that failures stem more from contract-misaligned self-validation than from limited budget or backbone strength.

The Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) architecture allows AI to be embedded directly into the RAN through modular xApps and rApps, yet creating these applications collecting data, training models, writing code, and deploying them safely remains slow and largely manual. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer strong reasoning and code-generation capabilities but are unsuited for the fast, deterministic inference required in real-time RAN control. We present a proof-of-concept Dual-Brain architecture that combines both strengths: an LLM-based orchestrator translates operator intents into data-collection policies and deployment code, while an automated ML engine, NeuralSmith, trains lightweight classifiers on demand via an API. We describe the architecture and provisioning workflow, share practical insights from a containerized O-RAN 5G~SA testbed, and discuss open research directions.

This paper presents a novel density control framework for multi-robot systems with spatial safety and energy sustainability guarantees. Stochastic robot motion is encoded through the Fokker-Planck Partial Differential Equation (PDE) at the density level. Control Lyapunov and control barrier functions are integrated with PDEs to enforce target density tracking, obstacle region avoidance, and energy sufficiency over multiple charging cycles. The resulting quadratic program enables fast in-the-loop implementation that adjusts commands in real-time. Multi-robot experiment and extensive simulations were conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the controller under localization and motion uncertainties.

Conventional wisdom holds that large-batch training is fundamentally incompatible with Reinforcement Learning (RL) - beyond a modest threshold, increasing batch sizes typically yields diminishing returns or performance degradation due to the inherent non-stationarity of the data distribution. We challenge this view by observing that non-stationarity is not a fixed property of RL, but evolves throughout training: early stages exhibit rapid behavioral shifts that demand small batches for plasticity, whereas late stages approach a quasi-stationary regime where large batches enable precise convergence. Motivated by this observation, we propose Adaptive Batch Scaling (ABS), that dynamically adjusts the effective batch size according to the stability of the learning policy. Central to ABS is Behavioral Divergence, a novel metric that quantifies policy non-stationarity by measuring action-level shifts between consecutive updates, which we use to scale batch size inversely to policy volatility. Integrated with the Parallelised Q-Network (PQN) algorithm and evaluated on the ALE benchmark, ABS seamlessly reconciles early-stage plasticity with late-stage stable convergence. Strikingly, contrary to conventional wisdom, our results reveal that the combination of larger networks and larger batch sizes achieves the best performance - a scaling behavior previously thought to be unattainable in RL, now unlocked through adaptive batch control.

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Electronic Design Automation (EDA) and hardware security is rapidly reshaping the semiconductor industry. While LLMs offer unprecedented capabilities in generating Register Transfer Level (RTL) code, automating testbenches, and bridging the semantic gap between high-level specifications and silicon, they simultaneously introduce severe vulnerabilities. This comprehensive review provides an in-depth analysis of the state-of-the-art in LLM-driven hardware design, organized around key advancements in EDA synthesis, hardware trust, design for security, and education. We systematically expand on the methodologies of recent breakthroughs -- from reasoning-driven synthesis and multi-agent vulnerability extraction to data contamination and adversarial machine learning (ML) evasion. We integrate general discussions on critical countermeasures, such as dynamic benchmarking to combat data memorization and aggressive red-teaming for robust security assessment. Finally, we synthesize cross-cutting lessons learned to guide future research toward secure, trustworthy, and autonomous design ecosystems.

During conversational interactions, humans subconsciously engage in concurrent thinking while listening to a speaker. Although this internal cognitive processing may not always manifest as explicit linguistic structures, it is instrumental in formulating high-quality responses. Inspired by this cognitive phenomenon, we propose a novel Full-duplex LAtent and Internal Reasoning method named FLAIR that conducts latent thinking simultaneously with speech perception. Unlike conventional "thinking" mechanisms in NLP, which require post-hoc generation, our approach aligns seamlessly with spoken dialogue systems: during the user's speaking phase, it recursively feeds the latent embedding output from the previous step into the next step, enabling continuous reasoning that strictly adheres to causality without introducing additional latency. To enable this latent reasoning, we design an Evidence Lower Bound-based objective that supports efficient supervised finetuning via teacher forcing, circumventing the need for explicit reasoning annotations. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this think-while-listening design, which achieves competitive results on a range of speech benchmarks. Furthermore, FLAIR robustly handles conversational dynamics and attains competitive performance on full-duplex interaction metrics.

Preprocessing screening is often the most expensive part of a near-infrared spectroscopy calibration workflow. It works because smoothing, derivatives, detrending and related filters change the spectral directions seen by partial least squares (PLS) or Ridge regression, but a full external search repeatedly refits nearly the same linear model. This paper studies the case where that search can be collapsed into one calibration step. For a strict linear preprocessing operator A acting on row spectra as XA^T, the transformed PLS cross-covariance satisfies (XA^T)^T Y = A X^T Y, and Ridge regression depends on the operator-induced kernel X A^T A X^T. These identities let a finite operator bank be screened inside the model while retaining original-wavelength coefficients, and the same identity extends to cheaply evaluated linear operator chains. Sample-adaptive or fitted corrections such as SNV, MSC, EMSC and ASLS are not strict linear; we prove the boundary and keep them as fold-local branches. The cohort has 61 regression and 17 classification rows, with a strict paired regression denominator of N=32 for the eight paper variants. There, AOM-PLS reaches median RMSEP ratios of 0.991/0.990 (simple) and 0.985/1.002 (best) against PLS-default/PLS-HPO, and AOM-Ridge reaches 0.974/0.984 (simple) and 0.918/0.966 (best) against Ridge-default/Ridge-HPO. The operator-adaptive classifier AOM-PLS-DA improves balanced accuracy by a median 0.159 on N=13 datasets (12/13 wins). The practical result is the runtime gap: PLS-HPO takes a median 710.81 s per run, whereas AOM-PLS takes 1.18-1.63 s -- 436 to 602 times less PLS fitting time. Linear operator-adaptive calibration thus gives prediction quality comparable to exhaustive preprocessing screening, with orders-of-magnitude less fitting time for PLS.

We propose a new numerical method to estimate the fault tolerance of failure modes in digital circuit structures with a generative network sampling technique. From a random input of generated bitwise configurations of ideally digitalised analog currents in the digital circuit design with classical logical gates, expected output currents are compared to the realistic signals of a numerical experiment at the discriminator part of the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to calculate the deviation from ideal digital electronic signals, including various error modes, such as missing or interchanged logical devices. From the present analysis of a representation of the GAN in terms of complex variables, it is possible to evaluate the robustness in electronic designs by differentiating the impact of failure modes associated with different classical logical elements in the circuit.

We propose Coreset-Induced Conditional Velocity Flow Matching (CCVFM), a generative model that augments hierarchical rectified flow with a data-informed source distribution. Hierarchical flow matching models the full conditional velocity law in velocity space, but its inner flow is asked to transport isotropic Gaussian noise to a multimodal target velocity distribution from scratch. Our key observation is that this inner source can be replaced by a closed-form surrogate built from a coreset of the target. CCVFM first compresses the target into weighted atoms using an entropic Sinkhorn coreset and lifts them to a Gaussian mixture. The induced conditional velocity law is then a closed-form Gaussian mixture that can be sampled without a learned neural sampler. A lightweight correction flow, trained from this exact surrogate source, then refines the remaining surrogate-to-target residual rather than learning an entire noise-to-data map. We prove that the surrogate transport cost equals the target--surrogate Wasserstein gap under an explicit compression assumption, whereas the noise-source analogue has a dimension-scale lower bound. We further characterize the conditional second moment of the direct surrogate-source training target and show that its source-dependent excess is small when the surrogate conditional law is close to the true conditional velocity law in mean and covariance. Empirically, on MNIST, CIFAR-10, ImageNet-32, and CelebA-HQ, the proposed method reaches competitive few-step generation under matched architectures.

In this paper, we present AgentDisCo, a novel Disentangled and Collaborative agentic architecture that formulates deep research as an adversarial optimization problem between information exploration and exploitation. Unlike existing approaches that conflate these two processes into a single module, AgentDisCo employs a critic agent to evaluate generated outlines and refine search queries, and a generator agent to retrieve updated results and revise outlines accordingly. The iteratively refined outline is then passed to a downstream report writer that synthesizes a comprehensive research report. The overall workflow supports both handcrafted and automatically discovered design strategies via a meta-optimization harness, in which the generator agent is repurposed as a scoring agent to evaluate critic outputs and generate quality signals. Powerful code-generation agents (e.g., Claude-Code, Codex) systematically explore agent configurations and construct a policy bank, a structured repository of reusable design strategies, enabling the framework to self-refine without extensive human intervention. We evaluate AgentDisCo on three established deep research benchmarks (DeepResearchBench, DeepConsult, DeepResearchGym) using Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieving performance comparable to or surpassing leading closed-source systems. Observing that existing benchmarks inadequately reflect real-world user needs, we introduce GALA (General AI Life Assistants), a benchmark that mines latent research interests from users' historical browsing behavior. We further develop a rendering agent that converts research reports into visually rich poster presentations, and demonstrate an end-to-end product, AutoResearch Your Interest, which delivers personalized deep research recommendations derived from individual browsing histories.

Video and image streaming on edge devices requires low latency. To address this, Neural Networks (NNs) are widely used, and prior work mainly focuses on accelerating them with single hardware units such as Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and Deep Learning Processing Units (DPUs). However, further reductions in latency can be observed by combining these units. In this paper, partitioning CNN inference across DPU and GPU (Split CNN Inference) is proposed. The first partition runs on the AI engines (DPU) of a Versal VCK190, which consists of initial CNN layers processing the input images. The DPU processes the first partition near the source of the data. Pipelined asynchronously, a GPU runs the remaining layers. The GPU (NVIDIA RTX 2080) processes the second partition, albeit having reduced the data transfer between the data source (storage/camera) and the GPU. Furthermore, a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based partition index prediction method is proposed to automate the partitioning of CNNs needed for Split Inference. Well established models such as LeNet-5, ResNet18/50/101/152, VGG16, and MobileNetv2 are analyzed. Results demonstrate up to 2.48x latency improvement over DPU-only execution and up to 3.37x over GPU-only execution. The trained GNN model splits the layers between the appropriate devices with 96.27% accuracy.

Automating repository-level software engineering tasks is a foundational challenge for autonomous code agents, largely due to the difficulty of configuring executable environments. However, manual configuration remains a labor-intensive bottleneck, necessitating a transition toward fully automated environment configuration. Existing approaches often rely on pre-defined artifacts or are restricted to specific programming languages, limiting their applicability to diverse real-world repositories. In this paper, we first propose RAT (RunAnyThing), a modular and extensible agent framework for fully automated configuration across programming languages on arbitrary repositories. RAT adopts a multi-stage pipeline that integrates language-aware abstraction, image initialization, specialized configuration toolset, and robust sandbox. Furthermore, to enable rigorous evaluation, we propose RATBench, a benchmark reflects the comprehensive coverage of real-world repositories. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RAT achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving Environment Setup Success Rate (ESSR) by an average of 36.1% over strong baselines.

As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical. However, current evaluation paradigms-focused on single agents or small, explicitly structured groups-fail to capture the self-organization and viral information dynamics that arise in large, decentralized populations. We introduce a systematic evaluation framework to benchmark role specialization, information diffusion, and cooperative task resolution in open agent environments. We demonstrate this framework on the MoltBook Observatory Archive, a dataset of 2.73M interactions among 90,704 autonomous agents, establishing quantitative baselines for emergent coordination. Our evaluation reveals a pronounced core-periphery structure (silhouette 0.91), heavy-tailed cascade distributions ($α= 2.57$), and severe coordination overhead in decentralized task resolution (Cohen's $d = -0.88$ against a single-agent baseline). By providing standardized evaluation tasks and empirical baselines, our framework enables the rigorous comparison of future multi-agent protocols and establishes evaluation itself as an object of scientific study.

Despite the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) in code generation, existing evaluations focus on functional correctness or syntactic validity, overlooking how LLMs make critical design choices such as which library or programming language to use. To fill this gap, we perform the first empirical study of LLMs' preferences for libraries and programming languages when generating code, covering eight diverse LLMs. We observe a strong tendency to overuse widely adopted libraries such as NumPy; in up to 45% of cases, this usage is not required and deviates from the ground-truth solutions. The LLMs we study also show a significant preference toward Python as their default language. For high-performance project initialisation tasks where Python is not the optimal language, it remains the dominant choice in 58% of cases, and Rust is not used once. These results highlight how LLMs prioritise familiarity and popularity over suitability and task-specific optimality; underscoring the need for targeted fine-tuning, data diversification, and evaluation benchmarks that explicitly measure language and library selection fidelity.

KAN-PCA is an autoencoder that uses a KAN as encoder and a linear map as decoder. It generalizes classical PCA by replacing linear projections with learned B-spline functions on each edge. The motivation is to capture more variance than classical PCA, which becomes inefficient during market crises when the linear assumption breaks down and correlations between assets change dramatically. We prove that if the spline activations are forced to be linear, KAN-PCA yields exactly the same results as classical PCA, establishing PCA as a special case. Experiments on 20 S&P 500 stocks (2015-2024) show that KAN-PCA achieves a reconstruction R^2 of 66.57%, compared to 62.99% for classical PCA with the same 3 factors, while matching PCA out-of-sample after correcting for data leakage in the training procedure.

We demonstrate how supervised learning can be decomposed into a two-stage procedure, where (1) all model parameters are selected in an unsupervised manner, and (2) the outputs y are added to the model, without changing the parameter values. This is achieved by a new model selection criterion that - in contrast to cross-validation - can be used also without access to y. For linear ridge regression, we bound the asymptotic out-of-sample risk of our method in terms of the optimal asymptotic risk. We also demonstrate that versions of linear and kernel ridge regression, smoothing splines, k-nearest neighbors, random forests, and neural networks, trained without access to y, perform similarly to their standard y-based counterparts. Hence, our results suggest that the difference between supervised and unsupervised learning is less fundamental than it may appear.

We consider a variant of sequential testing by betting where, at each time step, the statistician is presented with multiple data sources (arms) and obtains data by choosing one of the arms. We consider the composite global null hypothesis $\mathscr{P}$ that all arms are null in a certain sense (e.g. all dosages of a treatment are ineffective) and we are interested in rejecting $\mathscr{P}$ in favor of a composite alternative $\mathscr{Q}$ where at least one arm is non-null (e.g. there exists an effective treatment dosage). We posit an optimality desideratum that we describe informally as follows: even if several arms are non-null, we seek $e$-processes and sequential tests whose performance are as strong as the ones that have oracle knowledge about which arm generates the most evidence against $\mathscr{P}$. Formally, we generalize notions of log-optimality and expected rejection time optimality to more than one arm, obtaining matching lower and upper bounds for both. A key technical device in this optimality analysis is a modified upper-confidence-bound-like algorithm for unobservable but sufficiently "estimable" rewards. In the design of this algorithm, we derive nonasymptotic concentration inequalities for optimal wealth growth rates in the sense of Kelly [1956]. These may be of independent interest.