AI中文摘要
无人机越来越多地用于危险环境(如灾区、污染场地、野火区域和受损基础设施)中的探索驱动监测,此时有限的飞行续航必须在访问报告位置和收集新信息之间分配。在这些场景中,关于危险的先验信息通常不完整、空间不精确,并且在执行过程中可能发生变化。例如,初始报告可能识别出危险可能存在的区域,但实际危险可能被移动、部分观察到或完全未被报告。我们提出了一种集成的探索感知无人机路径优化与轨迹规划框架,用于在不确定和演变的先验信息下进行危险监测。环境被表示为空间风险地图,每个位置都有相关的危险状况信念。报告的危险被建模为不确定的兴趣区域(ROI),而不是确认的目标位置,要求无人机在检查报告区域的同时,利用有限的飞行续航探索信息丰富的区域。所提出的方法解决了报告ROI上的车辆路径问题,通过辅助伪节点增强路径以改善空间覆盖,将剩余飞行距离预算分配到路径段,并优化局部探索的动态可行B样条轨迹。在执行过程中,无人机测量更新基于网格的信念地图,当新信息和剩余预算证明调整合理时,对剩余轨迹进行重规划。在48种场景配置中,在线重规划相比离线优化规划器平均KL散度降低15.9%,相比直线遍历降低48.6%。
英文摘要
Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly used for exploration-driven monitoring in hazardous environments such as disaster zones, contaminated sites, wildfire areas, and damaged infrastructure, where limited flight endurance must be allocated between visiting reported locations and gathering new information. In these settings, prior information regarding hazards is often incomplete, spatially imprecise, and subject to change during execution. For example, initial reports may identify a region where a hazard is likely to exist, but the actual hazard may be displaced, partially observed, or entirely unreported. We present an integrated exploration-aware UAV route optimization and path planning framework for hazard monitoring under uncertain and evolving prior information. The environment is represented as a spatial risk map, where each location has an associated belief of hazardous conditions. Reported hazards are modeled as uncertain regions of interest (ROIs) rather than confirmed target locations, requiring the UAV to inspect reported areas while also using its limited flight endurance to explore informative regions. The proposed method solves a vehicle routing problem over reported ROIs, augments the route with auxiliary pseudo-nodes to improve spatial coverage, allocates the remaining flight distance budget across route segments, and optimizes dynamically feasible B-spline trajectories for local exploration. During execution, UAV measurements update a grid-based belief map, and the remaining trajectory is replanned when new information and the remaining budget justify adaptation. Across 48 scenario configurations, online replanning improves average KL reduction by 15.9% over the offline optimized planner and 48.6% over straight-line traversal.