Hyperparameter transfer allows extrapolating optimal optimization hyperparameters from small to large scales, making it critical for training large language models (LLMs). This is done either by fitting a scaling law to the hyperparameters or by a judicious choice of parameterization, such as Maximal Update ($μ$P), that renders optimal hyperparameters approximately scale invariant. In this paper, we first develop a framework to quantify hyperparameter transfer through three metrics: (1) the quality of the scaling law fit, (2) the robustness to extrapolation errors, and (3) the asymptotic loss penalty due to choice of parameterization. Next, we investigate through a comprehensive series of ablations why $μ$P appears to offer high-quality learning rate transfer relative to standard parameterization (SP), as existing theory is inadequate. We find that the overwhelming benefit of $μ$P relative to SP when training with AdamW arises simply from maximizing the learning rate of the embedding layer. In SP, the embedding layer learning rate acts as a bottleneck that induces training instabilities; increasing it by a factor of width to match $μ$P dramatically smooths out training while improving hyperparameter transfer. We also find that weight decay improves the scaling law fits, while, in the fixed token-per-parameter setting, it hurts the robustness of the extrapolation.

This research note investigates the impact of the experience museum Sensoria, opened in September 2024 in Holzminden, Germany, on local tourism demand and related direct and indirect effects. To this end, the study employs a novel approach by combining causal inference and demand-side economic analysis. A difference-in-differences approach is employed to quantify the number of additional guest overnight stays in the treatment city; the results are converted into industry-specific expenditures, from which the direct and indirect effects of Sensoria are determined. A positive and significant impact which corresponds to 4,691 additional overnight stays can be detected in the first year of operation of the new tourist attraction, resulting in an additional gross turnover of approximately 0.56 million EUR across the hospitality and retail industries and other services. The direct effects and indirect effects amount to approximately 0.23 and 0.21 million EUR, respectively. However, long-term effects cannot (yet) be determined. Additionally, positive effects from small and large events in the cities studied can be demonstrated. This brief study demonstrates that combining the two approaches mentioned holds promise, yet requires a more in-depth analysis, for which suggestions are also discussed regarding how it could be conducted.

Suppose a planner has a pre-trained simulator of a sequential decision problem and the option to run real experiments in the field. The simulator is cheap to query but inherits confounding and drift from its calibration data. Experimentation is unbiased but consumes one real unit per trial. We study when, and how, the planner should supplement the simulator with experiments. We give three results. First, an extended simulation lemma decomposes the simulator's value error into a calibration--deployment shift that randomization can identify and a parametric residual that no further interaction can reduce. Second, the value gap between the simulator-optimal policy and the optimum splits into a local component, on states the deployed policy already visits, and a reachability component, on states it does not. The reachability component stays bounded away from zero at any horizon under purely passive learning. Third, we propose Fisher-SEP, a simulation-aided experimental policy (SEP) that minimizes the posterior predictive variance of a target policy's value, with reward-only and transition-only specializations. Two case studies illustrate the regimes. In a vending-machine supply chain, front-loaded experimentation overtakes posterior updating once the horizon is long enough to amortize the pilot. In an HIV mobile-testing example with a corridor that separates a well-surveilled region from a poorly-surveilled one, only designed exploration reaches the poorly-surveilled region.

Standard approaches to forecasting the weekly number of earthquakes on a spatial grid rely on the Poisson distribution with a single global dispersion assumption. We show that this assumption is systematically violated in seismic data from Central Asia (2010-2024), where a likelihood-ratio test with boundary correction strongly rejects the Poisson hypothesis (p < 10^{-179}). The main contribution of this work is the EarthquakeNet architecture, which provides an endogenous per-cell estimate of the overdispersion parameter alpha via a neural network (spatial embeddings + MLP), without explicit spatial covariance specification. In contrast to existing negative binomial regression approaches in seismological forecasting, which typically assume a single global alpha, the proposed per-cell formulation allows the model to identify spatial heterogeneity in seismic clustering and to construct probabilistic risk-aware alerts via quantiles of the predicted distribution. A walk-forward evaluation (2018-2023) over four systems shows an 8.6 percent reduction in mean pinball deviation (MPD) relative to a negative binomial GLM baseline. The strongest improvements are observed in the tail regime (Y >= 5), where the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) of the proposed model is 12.5 percent lower than that of the baseline, indicating improved calibration in extreme-event forecasting.

We introduce the data driven extreme value distribution (DDEVD) estimator, a kernel-based method for estimating extreme value distributions from data. We derive its mean integrated squared error (MISE) in detail, use it to compute the optimal bandwidth and establish stability conditions for the bandwidth optimization procedure.

Modern experimental designs often face the so-called treatment cardinality constraint, which is the constraint on the number of included factors in each treatment. Experiments with such constraints are commonly encountered in engineering simulation, AI system tuning, and large-scale system verification. This calls for the development of adequate designs to enable statistical efficiency for modeling and analysis within feasible constraints. In this work, we study two-level designs under this $k$-treatment cardinality constraint (TCARD), where the design matrix $\mathbf{X} \in \{0,1\}^{n \times p}$ has constant row sums equal to $k$. Although TCARDs are closely related to balanced incomplete block designs (BIBDs), exact BIBD structure is unavailable for many practical $(n,p,k)$ combinations. This leads to the notion of nearly balanced TCARDs, which we prove minimize the first two components of the generalized word-length pattern. We also show that good projection behavior in this setting is governed by two count-based regularities: balanced factor replications and uniform pairwise concurrences. Motivated by this characterization, we then propose the Balanced Concurrence Deviation ($Φ_{\mathrm{BCD}}$), a model-free objective that jointly penalizes replication imbalance and concurrence dispersion. We further show that this criterion is closely connected to classical optimality principles, including $(M,S)$-optimality, centered $\mathrm{UE}(s^2)$ criterion, and Bayesian $D$-optimality. To construct designs minimizing $Φ_{\mathrm{BCD}}$, we develop a coordinate-exchange (CE) algorithm with efficient incremental updates, together with a simulation-based procedure for calibrating the criterion weights to the intended downstream task. Numerical experiments confirm that the proposed method compares favorably with existing alternatives across a range of problem sizes and constraint strengths.

Generative neural networks learn how to produce highly realistic images from a large, but finite number of examples - or do they simply memorise their training set? To settle this question, Kadkhodaie, Guth, Simoncelli and Mallat (ICLR '24) trained diffusion models independently on disjoint subsets of a dataset and showed that they converge to nearly the same density when the number of training images is large enough. This result raises two basic questions: how much data do you need for convergence, and what does convergence capture about learning the data distribution? Here, we address these questions by providing an exact analytical characterisation of the transition from memorisation to generalisation in linear generative models. We find that these models memorise at small load, while convergence emerges continuously when the number of samples is linear in the input dimension. Strikingly, we find that convergence is insensitive to recovery of the principal latent factors of the data, which are recovered in a sharp transition. After extending our approach to data with power-law spectra, we find the same distinction between convergence and latent recovery in our experiments with convolutional denoisers and in the data of Kadkhodaie et al. We thus show that generalisation in generative models decomposes into at least two distinct objectives: matching the bulk of the data distribution and recovering the principal latent factors. These objectives correspond to two different distances between true and learnt data distribution, and only the first one is captured by convergence.

Despite the remarkable empirical success of generative models, the available theory on their statistical accuracy in scientific computing remains largely pessimistic. This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding the regularity of transport maps and the generalization properties of one-step Wasserstein-guided generative models for PDE-induced probability measures. We consider normalized target densities associated with linear elliptic and parabolic equations on bounded domains, as well as diffusion and Fokker--Planck equations on the torus. Under standard structural assumptions, we prove that these target measures satisfy doubling conditions. By combining this fact with regularity theory for optimal transport between doubling measures, we show that the optimal transport map from a uniform source measure to the target measure is Hölder continuous. This regularity yields an approximation-theoretic justification for one-step generative models that learn PDE-induced distributions via a single pushforward map. As a representative instance, we study DeepParticle and derive excess-risk bounds characterizing the discrepancy between the learned map and the population-optimal map. We also establish a robustness estimate under target shift and illustrate the theory with experiments which support the derived rates.

Summaries of craters on terrestrial bodies, such as the number and size distribution, are essential for understanding the history of the Solar System. Identifying craters, however, has not been automated and thus relies on expert crater-counters marking static images. Robbins et al. (2014) (hereafter R14) showed that, contrary to previously held assumptions, there exists large variability across expert crater-counters' identified crater lists. How best to combine identified crater lists across multiple experts for the purposes of learning about the Solar System is an open and consequential question. R14 combined identified crater lists via clustering through a modification of the popular DBSCAN clustering method. Their approach did not, however, make use of all the constraining information available nor did it provide an estimate of clustering uncertainty. To address the shortcomings of the DBSCAN method, we present a novel clustering approach that can combine multiple lists of identified objects of interest from the same image. The key innovation is incorporating a dysfunctional family constraint into the Bayesian nonparametric clustering approach, the Chinese restaurant process (CRP), which naturally takes into account information about the crater identifier. The dysfunctional family Chinese restaurant process (DFCRP) provides an estimate of clustering uncertainty. In this work, we provide guidance on hyperparameter specification, present a Gibbs sampler, and perform a simulation study to compare the performance of the DFCRP to the CRP. Finally, we apply the DFCRP to the crater identification problem of R14, comparing results, and also demonstrate the types of analyses that can be performed with posterior draws of cluster assignments.

Optimal transport provides an inherently geometric and highly structured framework for studying spaces of probability measures, supplying a rich theoretical toolkit for contemporary statistics, machine learning, and generative modelling. In applications, however, the measures of interest are almost never known precisely, calling for a theory of optimal transport that accounts for statistical uncertainty. We construct such a framework, lifting the classical theory to the setting of random probability measures. We introduce the $L^2$ over Wasserstein space establishing that it inherits the formal Riemannian structure of the Wasserstein space by characterising distances and geodesic geometry. The structure induces random flows with Wasserstein gradient flow sample paths, making it the natural extension of the Wasserstein space which allows for random gradient flow dynamics. We ensemble statistical convergence results of the optimal transport machinery using the empirical measure within the $L^2$ over Wasserstein framework. Moreover, in the setting of Bayesian non-parametrics, we refine Schwartz's consistency theorem to the Wasserstein topology and deduce posterior convergence of the same machinery in the $L^2$ over Wasserstein space. We demonstrate that the growing theory of random token sampling for transformer models using self-attention flow paths can be embedded into the our framework. The results provide a unified treatment of random optimal transport and its consequences for principled inference and generative modelling under the statistical uncertainty of random sampling.

We study the problem of testing $H_0: ξ^\topβ=t_0$ in high-dimensional sparse linear regression with Gaussian random design and unknown design covariance. The loading vector $ξ$ is arbitrary, and the exact sparsity level $k$ is unknown but bounded by a known value $k_u$. Tests are required to control Type I error uniformly over the $k_u$-sparse null, while power is evaluated against $k$-sparse alternatives. We construct a computationally efficient mixed test that gives an upper bound on the adaptive separation distance and establish an information-theoretic lower bound calibrated to the magnitude profile of $ξ$. In the ultra-sparse regime $k_u\lesssim \sqrt n/\log p$, these bounds characterize the adaptive separation rate up to logarithmic factors for arbitrary $ξ$. In the moderately sparse regime $\sqrt n/\log p\ll k_u\lesssim n/\log p$, these bounds match for several classes of loading vectors but may differ in general. In this regime, we further prove a low-degree lower bound that matches the upper bound up to logarithmic factors. This provides evidence that improving on the rate of the mixed test, if statistically possible, may be computationally hard. For flat sparse loadings, we complement this evidence with a polynomial-time reduction from sparse CCA. Finally, we examine how information about the design covariance affects the adaptive separation rate in two settings. Under a sparse signed-spiked covariance model, the information-theoretic lower bound is attainable up to logarithmic factors by a computationally inefficient procedure, while the low-degree lower bound and sparse-CCA reduction continue to apply, providing evidence for a statistical-computational gap. When the design covariance is known and diagonal, the adaptive separation rate takes the same form as in the ultra-sparse regime.

Functional bilevel methods estimate a lower-level function and plug it into a hypergradient, but this plug-in gradient can retain first-order bias when the lower-level problem is learned nonparametrically. To remove this bias, we develop a semiparametric debiasing theory for population bilevel gradients based on the efficient influence function. This perspective leads to a cross-fitted orthogonal hypergradient estimator for which we establish asymptotic normality together with uniform control over the outer parameter. Under quadratic losses, the estimator reduces to a simple doubly robust score based on conditional mean nuisances. On synthetic bilevel benchmarks with known ground truth, the method tracks the oracle efficient-gradient benchmark and improves over plug-in functional hypergradients and regularized kernel bilevel baselines.

Bitcoin's price has been described as following a power law (PL) in time, $P \sim t^β$ with $\hatβ\approx 5.7$ over 2010-2026. We test this claim using the Clauset-Shalizi-Newman protocol applied to Bitcoin's tail-relevant distributional series, and develop three principled time-domain adaptations of the protocol. We find that (i) the distributional power law is rejected on UTXO balances and daily |returns|, with lognormal preferred decisively; (ii) the fitted time-domain exponent varies by nearly a factor of three across reasonable shifts of the time origin -- it is not specification-robust in the sense required for a shift-invariant structural reading; (iii) standard residual diagnostics and scale-invariance tests proposed in earlier work cannot distinguish a power law from a multi-component sigmoid stack fit to the same data; (iv) Bitcoin price stands apart in a cross-asset comparison spanning Bitcoin on-chain metrics and traditional asset classes: it is the only series in the nine-series in-sample test where no single-component growth curve improves on the power law, and the quarterly $K=3$ wave-stability bootstrap rejects the PL+AR(1) null on Bitcoin at $p = 0.015$ (strict 15% CV threshold) -- a clear cross-asset separation, although not a Bonferroni-robust rejection; and (v) walk-forward Diebold-Mariano evaluation against ten candidates -- including standard time-series baselines (RW with drift, auto-ARIMA, ETS, local-linear-trend) -- shows the in-sample winner (multi-sigmoid) is among the worst long-horizon forecasters, while the simple power law dominates 12-24 month horizons against every standard baseline at $p < 0.05$, precisely because it does not commit to specific wave shapes. The fit-prediction tradeoff is the practical counterpart of the descriptive findings.

A variational inference-based framework for training a multi-output Gaussian process latent variable model, specifically tailored to the tails-up spatio-temporal stream network, is developed. Training, given a censored observational data set subject to missing values, proceeds by maximising a secondary variational lower bound on the model log marginal likelihood using gradient-based optimisation. Consequently, the theoretical development for a new family of tails-up spatio-temporal stream network models is introduced which rely on the sparse Gaussian process inducing variable framework, the Bayesian Gaussian process latent variable model, and local variational methods. These spatio-temporal models use stream distance instead of Euclidean distance and capture spatial and temporal dependencies using auto/cross-correlation and process convolution, respectively, which allows for the development of valid separable spatio-temporal stream network-based covariance functions. Results from the simulation-based case studies indicate that the proposed framework performs well when considering benchmark comparisons and several performance metrics.

In high-throughput biology, it is common to fit thousands of linear regressions -- one per gene, protein, or other unit -- with very few samples per unit. Limma-trend, one of the most widely used methods in this setting, improves power by shrinking variance estimates parametrically toward a fitted curve (the trend) relating variance to a unit-level summary (e.g., average intensity, peptide count), before computing p-values and applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). We study limma-trend through the lens of empirical partially Bayes inference, a paradigm in which a prior is posited and estimated for the nuisance parameters while parameters of interest remain fixed. From this perspective, limma-trend computes approximate partially Bayes p-values that condition on the residual sample variance and the unit-level summary. The same framework explains why MAnorm2, a popular variant for ChIP-seq, can sometimes fail to control FDR. We then derive a nonparametric generalization of limma-trend that estimates the residual variance prior using nonparametric maximum likelihood. Under dense signals, this procedure asymptotically controls the FDR -- even when the trend is misspecified or inconsistently estimated. To allow the full shape of the conditional variance distribution to depend on the unit-level summary, we develop a second procedure that learns it directly.

Gradient-flow analyses show that simplified linear transformers can learn the in-context linear-regression algorithm, but they do not explain the finite-step behavior of gradient descent at large learning rates. Motivated by empirical work on high-learning-rate transformer instabilities and by the cubic-map phase diagram for quadratic regression, we study an exactly reducible one-prompt linear-transformer training problem. After normalization, the dynamics reduce to a two-factor product map with an effective step-size parameter \(μ\). On the balanced slice, this map recovers the known scalar cubic transition from monotone convergence to catapult convergence, periodic and chaotic bounded nonconvergence, and divergence. We then analyze the full two-dimensional system and show that, for \(0<μ<2\), it has an explicit invariant Chebyshev ellipse separating forward-invariant regions; this ellipse carries off-balanced chaotic dynamics but is transversely repelling, while balanced scalar attractors can be transversely attracting. These results show that large constant learning rates can change the training attractor of the learned transformer rather than merely accelerating convergence: beyond sharp stability thresholds, finite-step training may settle into cycles, bounded chaos, or divergence instead of a single in-context linear-regression solution. We also discuss the consequences for mini-batch gradient descent based training methods.

We introduce a continuous-time Markov chain framework for estimating population size from multi-list data, which allows directional interactions to be modelled and can accommodate absorbing lists, such as death records, or more general data collection processes. The standard model of the continuous-time Markov chain framework and the log-linear model for multi-list data are equivalent when lists are independent and we show empirically that they give similar results in the presence of dependencies between lists. Through a simulation study, we highlight the need to account for an absorbing list by using the Markov model or the log-linear model with forced absorbing interactions, observing biased estimates of the population size otherwise. We motivate our approach with an epidemiological dataset concerning individuals suffering from a first ever stroke in North-West England, in which one of the lists is a death record. We illustrate a further use of our approach by considering a case of ordered lists on drug use data from the City of London.

A convergence analysis is developed for the regularized Newton method for training neural networks (NNs) in the overparameterized limit. As the number of hidden units tends to infinity, the NN training dynamics converge in probability to the solution of a deterministic limit equation involving a ``Newton neural tangent kernel'' (NNTK). Explicit rates characterizing this convergence are provided and, in the infinite-width limit, we prove that the NN converges exponentially fast to the target data (i.e., a global minimizer with zero loss). We show that this convergence is uniform across the frequency spectrum, addressing the spectral bias inherent in gradient descent. The eigenvalues of the NTK for gradient descent accumulate at zero, leading to slow convergence for target data with high-frequency components. In contrast, the NNTK has uniformly lower bounded eigenvalues if the regularization parameter is selected appropriately, allowing Newton's method to converge more quickly for data with high-frequency components. Mathematical challenges that need to be addressed in our analysis include the implicit parameter update of the Newton method with a potentially indefinite Hessian matrix and the fact that the dimension of this linear system of equations tends to infinity as the NN width grows. This complicates deriving the training dynamics in the overparameterized limit as well as proving the convergence of the finite-width dynamics thereto. The analysis identifies a scaling formula for selecting the regularization parameter, which we show can vanish at a suitable rate as the number of hidden units becomes larger. We prove that, for sufficiently large numbers of hidden units, the regularized Hessian remains positive definite during training and the Newton updates for individual NN parameters converge to zero, showing that the model behaves as a linearization around the initialization.

We propose a new regularized optimal transport (OT) formulation, termed sliced-regularized optimal transport (SROT). Unlike entropic OT (EOT), which regularizes the transport plan toward an independent coupling, SROT regularizes it toward a smoothened sliced OT (SOT) plan. To the best of our knowledge, SROT is the first approach to leverage a version of SOT plan as a reference to improve classical OT. We provide a formal definition of SROT, derive its dual formulation, and provide a post-Bayesian interpretation of SROT. We then develop a Sinkhorn-style algorithm for efficient computation, retaining the same scalability advantages as EOT. By incorporating a scalable SOT plan as a prior, SROT yields more accurate approximations of the exact OT plan than EOT under the same level of regularization. Moreover, the resulting transport plan improves upon the reference SOT plan itself. We further introduce the corresponding OT divergence induced by SROT, named SROT divergence, and analyze its topological and computational properties. Finally, we validate our approach through experiments on synthetic datasets and color transfer tasks, demonstrating that SROT is better than both EOT and SOT in approximating exact OT. Additional experiments on gradient flows further highlight the advantages of SROT divergence.

Traditional step-stress accelerated life testing models assume that test units originate from a homogeneous population. Recently, Lu and Kateri (2025) proposed a heterogeneous cumulative exposure based SSALT model to account for the inhomogeneous aging patterns among test units belonging to the same production batch. This paper introduces an alternative yet flexible failure-rate based heterogeneous simple SSALT (h-SSALT) model with Weibull-distributed Type-II censored failure times, allowing heterogeneity to emerge at the second stress level through a finite mixture of m latent subgroups, each characterized by its own failure behavior. The expectation-maximization algorithm is developed for maximum likelihood estimation of the model parameters, exploiting the incomplete data structure arising from both unknown group membership and Type-II censoring. Interval estimation is performed using the missing information identity of Louis (1982) with transformation-based confidence intervals respecting parameter constraints. An extensive simulation study evaluates the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators and demonstrates, through a quantile-based comparison, that ignoring population heterogeneity leads to systematic bias in lifetime predictions across the entire quantile range, with the most severe consequences at early failure quantiles of direct relevance to warranty period design. A special case comparison confirms that the proposed Weibull failure-rate based formulation reduces to the existing model of Lu and Kateri (2025) when the shape parameter equals unity, validating the proposed framework as a proper generalization. The practical application of the model is further illustrated through simulated and real data analysis examples.

Understanding interaction effects among variables is important for regression modeling in various applications. The conventional approach of quantifying interactions as the product of variables often lacks clear interpretability, especially in complex systems. The concept of conditional main effects (CME) provides a more intuitive and interpretable framework for capturing interaction effects by quantifying the effect of one variable conditional on the level of another. A recent method called cmenet further considered the bi-level selection of CMEs by leveraging their natural grouping structure (e.g., sibling and cousin groups) through penalization. However, there are several limitations in the cmenet method, including the coupling ability of penalties for within-group CMEs, lack of adaptiveness for between-group penalties, and restriction to linear models with continuous responses. To overcome these limitations, we propose an adaptive cmenet method for CME selection under the generalized linear model (GLM) framework. The proposed method considers a penalized likelihood approach with adaptive weights to enable effective bi-level variable selection, improving both between-group and within-group selection. An efficient algorithm for parameter estimation is also developed by employing an iteratively reweighted least squares procedure. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated by both simulation studies and real-data studies in gene association analysis.

Networks of modern industrial systems are increasingly monitored by distributed sensors, where each system comprises multiple subsystems generating high dimensional time series data. These subsystems are often interdependent, making it important to understand how temporal patterns at one subsystem relate to others. This is challenging in decentralized settings where raw measurements cannot be shared and client observations are heterogeneous. In practical deployments each subsystem (client) operates a fixed proprietary model that cannot be modified or retrained, limiting existing approaches. Nonlinear dynamics further make cross client temporal interdependencies difficult to interpret because they are embedded in nonlinear state transition functions. We present a federated framework for learning temporal interdependencies across clients under these constraints. Each client maps high dimensional local observations to low dimensional latent states using a nonlinear state space model. A central server learns a graph structured neural state transition model over the communicated latent states using a Graph Attention Network. For interpretability we relate the Jacobian of the learned server side transition model to attention coefficients, providing the first interpretable characterization of cross client temporal interdependencies in decentralized nonlinear systems. We establish theoretical convergence guarantees to a centralized oracle and validate the framework through synthetic experiments demonstrating convergence, interpretability, scalability and privacy. Additional real world experiments show performance comparable to decentralized baselines.

We consider a general class of round-robin tournament models of equally strong players. In these models, each of the $n$ players competes against every other player exactly once. For each match between two players, the outcome is a value from a countable subset of the unit interval, and the scores of the two players in a match sum to one. The final score of each player is defined as the sum of the scores obtained in matches against all other players. We study the distribution of extreme scores, including the maximum, second maximum, and lower-order extremes. Since the exact distribution is computationally intractable even for small values of $n$, we derive asymptotic results as the number of players $n$ tends to infinity, including limiting distributions, and rates of convergence.

U.S. discrimination law can impose liability on firms that fail to adopt a less discriminatory alternative (LDA): a decision policy that achieves the same business objectives while reducing disparate impact on legally protected groups. Recent scholarship argues that this doctrine has direct implications for algorithmic decision-making in high-stakes domains such as employment, lending, and housing, potentially obligating firms to search for "less discriminatory algorithms" (Black et al., 2024). Regulators have at times encouraged proactive LDA searches, reinforcing the expectation of a good-faith effort to identify equally performant models with lower disparate impact. Model multiplicity makes such searches plausible: retraining with different random seeds can yield models with comparable predictive performance but materially different disparate impacts. Yet firms cannot retrain indefinitely, raising a central question: when is the search sufficient to demonstrate good faith? We formalize LDA search under multiplicity as an optimal stopping problem in which a developer seeks to produce evidence that further search is unlikely to yield meaningful improvements. Our main contribution is an adaptive stopping algorithm that provides a high-probability upper bound on the best disparate-impact gains attainable through continued retraining, enabling developers to certify (e.g., to a court) that additional search is unlikely to help. We also show how stronger distributional assumptions over the model space can yield tighter bounds, and we validate the approach on real-world credit and housing datasets.

The solar spectral irradiance (SSI) depicts the spectral distribution of solar energy flux reaching the top of the Earth's atmosphere. Daily SSI measurements constitute a matrix with spectrally (rows) and temporally (columns) resolved solar energy flux measurements. The most recent SSI measurements have been made by NASA's Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor-1 (TSIS-1) Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) since March 2018. This data has considerable missing data due to both random factors and instrument downtime, a periodic trend related to the Sun's cyclical magnetic activity, and varying degrees of correlation among the spectra, some approaching unity. We propose a low-rank matrix factorization method for SSI reconstruction that incorporates autoregressive temporal regularization, periodic spline detrending, and cross-spectral covariance information. The method is implemented as a two-stage procedure designed to address scattered missingness and extended downtime missingness, respectively, and is fitted using efficient alternating optimization algorithms. We further accompany the reconstructed SSI values with a distribution-free interval estimation procedure based on conformal prediction. Through synthetic experiments and real-data analyses, we compare this method with Gaussian process regression, linear time series smoothing, and existing matrix-completion approaches in terms of imputation accuracy, interval coverage, interval length, and computational efficiency. The results show that exploiting the periodic, temporal, and cross-spectral structure of SSI substantially improves reconstruction performance and yields calibrated uncertainty intervals, producing a reconstructed SSI data product suitable for downstream climate science studies.

Wasserstein distances are widely used in modern data analysis but pose significant computational and statistical challenges in high dimensions. The sliced Wasserstein distance alleviates these challenges by leveraging one-dimensional projections. Building on the Efron-Stein inequality-a technique proven effective in related problems-and a non-trivial control of the optimal transport potentials across directions, we establish a central limit theorem for the p-sliced Wasserstein distance, for p>1, centered at the expected empirical cost. Unlike for the general Wasserstein distance, the centering can be replaced by the population cost, enabling valid statistical inference. This generalizes and refines existing one-dimensional results, providing the first asymptotically valid inference framework for the sliced Wasserstein distance between possibly non-compact measures. Finally, we address other practical aspects crucial for inference, including Monte Carlo approximation of the slicing integral and consistent variance estimation.

The multi-armed bandits (MAB) framework is a widely used approach for sequential decision-making, where a decision-maker selects an arm in each round with the goal of maximizing long-term rewards. In many practical applications, such as personalized medicine and recommendation systems, contextual information is available at the time of decision-making, rewards from different arms are related rather than independent, and feedback is provided in batches. We propose a novel semi-parametric framework for batched bandits with covariates that incorporates a shared parameter across arms. We leverage the single-index regression (SIR) model to capture relationships between arm rewards while balancing interpretability and flexibility. Our algorithm, Batched single-Index Dynamic binning and Successive arm elimination (BIDS), employs a batched successive arm elimination strategy with a dynamic binning mechanism guided by the single-index direction. We consider two settings: one where a pilot direction is available and another where the direction is estimated from data, deriving theoretical regret bounds for both cases. When a pilot direction is available with sufficient accuracy and the number of arms $K$ is fixed, our approach achieves minimax-optimal rates (with $d = 1$) for nonparametric batched bandits, circumventing the curse of dimensionality. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm compared to the nonparametric batched bandit method introduced by \cite{jiang2025batched}.

Invariant causal prediction provides a useful framework for identifying causal predictors of a response using heterogeneous data from multiple environments. One valuable property of the original invariant causal prediction method is that it guarantees no false causal discoveries with high probability. Such a guarantee, however, can be overly conservative in some applications, resulting in few or no causal discoveries. This raises a natural question: can invariant causal prediction be equipped with less conservative error guarantees and thereby extract more causal information from the data? In this paper, we address this question by focusing on two widely used and more liberal guarantees: false discovery rate control and simultaneous true discovery bounds. A key step in our approach is to reformulate invariant causal prediction as a multiple testing problem. We then adopt the e-Closure principle to obtain (simultaneous) false discovery rate control, together with new p-to-e calibrators tailored to this setting. We also derive simultaneous true discovery bounds via closed testing, which provide additional causal information without requiring extra assumptions and retain all discoveries from the original invariant causal prediction method. Through simulations and a real data application on educational attainment of teenagers in the United States, we show that these more liberal error control guarantees can improve the practical usefulness of invariant causal prediction.

Compositional score-based approaches to simulation-based inference (SBI) approximate the posterior over a shared parameter given $n$ independent observations by aggregating individually learned posterior scores: currently, there are two main propositions of such methods (Geffner et al. (2023), Linhart et al. (2026)). As the resulting composite score does not correspond to the score of any distribution along the forward diffusion path of the true multi-observation posterior, sampling from it via a reverse SDE leads to an irreducible bias. Annealed Langevin dynamics provides a principled alternative: it treats the composite score as the genuine score of a sequence of tractable bridging densities and samples from them in succession. When properly tuned, it could lead to a controllable bias. However, its hyperparameters, namely step sizes, the number of steps per level, and the number of annealing levels, have so far been chosen empirically. We derive Wasserstein bounds for annealed Langevin with approximate scores and translate them into explicit decision rules for these hyperparameters that guarantee a prescribed sampling accuracy, while highlighting different theoretical aspects of each composite score formulation. In the Gaussian setting, we obtain closed-form expressions for all relevant quantities and prove that the bridging densities of Linhart et al. (2026) consistently admit larger step sizes and require fewer total Langevin steps than those of Geffner et al. (2023). Furthermore, we show empirically that the tuning obtained in the Gaussian setting generalizes to more complex problems, thus providing a well-understood and theoretically grounded starting point for practitioners using compositional score-based approaches.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a powerful tool for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). This paper studies LoRA under a federated learning setting, enabling collaborative fine-tuning across clients while preserving parameter efficiency. We focus on a highly heterogeneous regime in which clients share only partial structure and a substantial subset may be contaminated. We propose Collaborative Low-rank Alignment and Identifiable Recovery (CLAIR), a contamination-aware framework that relies only on preliminary local estimators. Its formulation applies broadly, from linear regression to neural network and LLM modules, whenever local adaptation can be represented by matrix-valued updates. CLAIR recovers the shared LoRA subspace and detects contaminated clients via a structured low-rank plus block-sparse decomposition. We prove exact recovery of the shared LoRA subspace in the noiseless case, stable recovery under preliminary estimation error, and consistent collaborative-set recovery under mild separation conditions. We further quantify the gain from CLAIR refinement: it reduces off-subspace estimation error through cross-client averaging while preserving client-specific variation within the shared LoRA subspace, thus improves over local fine-tuning whenever this oracle gain outweighs the costs of subspace estimation and benign-client heterogeneity. Empirically, we demonstrate the benefits of CLAIR by fine-tuning a Transformer architecture on a text-copying task. The results show accurate contamination detection and improved benign-client performance compared with local fine-tuning and non-robust federated averaging.

Laplace approximations are a standard tool for computationally efficient inference in latent Gaussian models, but they fail for quantile regression with the asymmetric Laplace likelihood because the observed Hessian vanishes almost everywhere. We show that this obstacle can be overcome without smoothing the likelihood: the relevant local curvature is given not by the observed Hessian, but by the Fisher information when the model is correctly specified and by the population curvature of the expected loss under misspecification. On this basis, we develop a Laplace approximation framework for quantile regression with mixed-effects and Gaussian process models. We propose practical curvature estimators, including the triangular kernel curvature (TKC) estimator, that yield approximations for posterior distributions and marginal likelihoods, and we establish their asymptotic validity. Empirically, the proposed methods are scalable and numerically stable, and for latent Gaussian models, they achieve accuracy comparable to or better than MCMC and variational competitors at substantially lower computational costs. More broadly, the framework clarifies how Laplace approximations can be justified for non-smooth generalized posteriors through local quadratic behavior of the expected loss.

An accurate assessment of a model's complexity is crucial for topics such as interpretation, generalization, and model selection. However, most existing complexity measures either rely on heuristic assumptions or are computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we present a mathematically rigorous yet easy-to-compute measure of model complexity that is based on the similarities between the model gradients across inputs. It is thus well-defined for any parametric model, but also for kernel-based non-parametric models. We prove that our measure of complexity generalizes model-specific complexity measures such as polynomial degree (for polynomial regression), kernel length scale (for Matérn kernels), number of neighbors (for k-nearest neighbors), number of splits (for decision trees), and number of trees (for random forests). We also use our measure to obtain new insights into the double descent phenomenon for random Fourier features, random forests, neural networks, and gradient boosting.

We consider Constrained Online Convex Optimization (COCO) with adversarially chosen constraints. At each round, the learner chooses an action before observing the loss and constraint function for that round. The goal is to achieve small static regret against the best point satisfying all constraints while also controlling cumulative constraint violation ($\mathsf{CCV}$). For strongly convex losses, state-of-the-art algorithms achieve $O(\log T)$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T \log T})$ $\mathsf{CCV}.$ The corresponding best-known bounds for convex losses is $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T} \log T)$ $\mathsf{CCV}$. In this paper, we give a simple projection-based algorithm that simultaneously achieves $O(\log T)$ regret and $O(\log T)$ $\mathsf{CCV}$ for strongly-convex losses, yielding an exponential improvement in the $\mathsf{CCV}$. For the convex losses, our algorithm improves the $\mathsf{CCV}$ to $O(\sqrt{T})$ while maintaining the optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret. The key to our improvement is a recent geometric result for self-contracted curves, which may be of independent interest.

Accurate and well-calibrated Machine Learning (ML) models are mandatory in high-stakes settings, yet effective multiclass calibration remains challenging: global approaches assume calibration errors are homogeneous across the latent space, while local methods often rely on latent-space dimensionality reduction, which leads to information loss. To address these issues, we propose a compositional approach to multiclass calibration, where region-specific calibration maps are constructed from shared codeword-dependent factors. We instantiate this idea via Vector Quantization (VQ), which induces a structured partition of the representation space, and an indexed parameterization of Dirichlet concentrations that enables parameter sharing across regions. Our approach learns heterogeneous calibration maps that generalize well even to sparse regions of the latent space. Experiments on benchmark datasets show significant improvements in local calibration while maintaining competitive global calibration and predictive performance.

For many years I have taught an advanced statistical inference course for master's students using the text of Casella and Berger (2002). The book gives a comprehensive treatment of the core topics at a level that avoids measure theory while remaining mathematically precise, but it does not cover the increasingly important concept of copulas. The present notes are intended to complement the book by adding two sections on copulas in a style that is as close as possible to that of the original text. Numbering of definitions, theorems, examples, and exercises is consistent with Casella and Berger (2002), but the material may also be read as a brief, stand-alone introduction to copula theory.

Gaussian processes (GPs) offer a principled probabilistic model over functions, but exact inference is restricted to the linear-Gaussian regime. We establish an explicit equivalence between GPs and a class of linear diffusion models, recasting predictive sampling as an ODE with closed-form Gaussian dynamics and a likelihood-dependent guidance term that admits a simple Monte Carlo approximation. In the linear-Gaussian setting, we recover standard GP conditioning exactly; beyond conjugacy, the same machinery handles any conditioning statement admitting point-wise likelihood evaluation -- including non-linear physics, and, for the first time, natural language via large language models. Whitening isolates the irreducible non-Gaussian dynamics, minimising Wasserstein-2 transport cost and eliminating numerical stiffness. The result is a general-purpose GP inference scheme requiring no bespoke derivations. Together, these results provide a general mechanism for incorporating the full richness of real-world knowledge as conditioning information, opening a new frontier for the probabilistic modelling of real-world problems.

We establish maximal concentration bounds for the iterates generated by stochastic approximation algorithms with general step sizes, where the noise has a finite-state Markovian component plus a Martingale-difference component. When the Martingale-difference noise is bounded, we show that the tail of the error can be sub-Gaussian, sub-Weibull, or something lighter than any Pareto but heavier than any Weibull, depending on the step size sequence and on whether the random operator is almost surely contractive, almost surely non-expansive, or expansive with positive probability. Our analysis relies on a novel Lyapunov function involving the moment-generating function of the solution to a Poisson equation, together with an auxiliary projected algorithm. We complement the upper bounds with worst-case examples showing that qualitatively sharper bounds are impossible. We further study the case of unbounded Martingale-difference noise when the average operator is contractive, and the step sizes are of order $1/k$. In this setting, we show that if the random operator is almost surely non-expansive, then the error tail is at most three times heavier than the noise tail, whereas if the random operator is expansive with positive probability, then the error may have substantially heavier tails. These results are obtained through a novel black-box truncation argument that reduces the unbounded-noise setting to the bounded-noise case.

This paper focuses on the estimation of partially observed branching processes. First, the estimators from a frequentist perspective proposed in the literature are reviewed. The main objective of this paper is to present computational tools based on sequential Monte Carlo methods to perform Bayesian inference for these processes. In particular, the Liu-West particle filter is applied to perform Bayesian estimation of the parameters of interest for an epidemic model fitted by a partially observed branching process. As application, the example given in [8] is revisited and extended.

Missing data is pervasive in many scientific domains such as public health, environmental science, and the social sciences. Recoverability from missing data is typically studied using fully specified variable-level missingness models despite that, in many applications, only coarse structural information is available, for instance when variables are grouped into clusters due to limited knowledge or interpretability reasons. In this paper, we investigate recoverability from such abstract representations. We introduce two classes of cluster-based missingness graphs: the m-C-DMG, which retains variable-specific missingness indicators, and the cm-C-DMG, which aggregates missingness mechanisms at the cluster level. We formalize the notion of compatibility between these abstract graphs and underlying variable-level missingness models, and study how this abstraction affects the recoverability of probabilistic and causal queries. In particular, we give graphical conditions of recovering the joint distribution as well as graphical conditions of recovering a macro causal effect. Overall, our results clarify when cluster-level missingness information is sufficient for valid inference, and when finer-grained modeling is necessary.

Communication is a major bottleneck in distributed learning, especially in large-scale settings and in federated learning environments with slow links. Three standard ways to reduce this cost are communication compression, local training, and communication-computation overlap. Methods that combine these ingredients are used in practice and have been found to be effective for large-scale training, but there is little theory for methods that combine all three. We study a heterogeneous-compute setting in which different workers may take different numbers of local steps, and we propose LOSCAR-SGD, a Local SGD method that communicates only a sparse subset of model coordinates and continues optimizing while communication is in flight. A key ingredient is a delay-corrected merge rule that incorporates delayed synchronized information without discarding the progress made during the overlap phase. We give convergence guarantees for smooth non-convex objectives and show how sparsity, overlap, and worker heterogeneity affect the rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theory for this combination of ingredients. Experiments further show that communication-computation overlap reduces training time and that the delay-corrected merge outperforms naive overwriting.

The intersection set of Bayesian and nonparametric statistics was almost empty until about 1973, but now is growing at a healthy rate. This chapter, for the {\it Highly Structured Stochastic Systems} book (Oxford University Press, 2003) gives an overview of various theoretical and applied research themes inside this field, partly complementing and extending recent reviews of Dey, M{ü}ller and Sinha (1998) and Walker, Damien, Laud and Smith (1999). The intention is not to be complete or exhaustive, but rather to touch on research areas of interest, partly by example.

This paper proposes a novel, nonparametric, interpoint distance-based measure to investigate whether there exist any groups in a set of given data, and if so then, how many groups are prevailing in total. It is a cluster accuracy index useful for arbitrary-dimensional data set, in association with any clustering algorithm having the number of groups specified as a priori. We perform univariate, nonparametric, multiple statistical tests of hypotheses, where as many dependent tests as the sample size are carried out using the interpoint distances. They possess $p$-values to be combined to reach a decision, which is taken in a step-wise process for a possible number of clusters. It reduces the unnecessary computations compared with the other accuracy measures from the literature. Data study establishes the proposed index's efficiency and superiority.

Large language models (LLMs) show potential as simulators of human behavior, offering a scalable way to study responses to interventions. However, because LLMs are trained largely on observational data, interventions in experiments with LLM-simulated synthetic users can induce unintended shifts in latent user attributes, causing user drift where the implicit simulated population differs across treatment conditions, potentially distorting effect estimates. We formalize the confounding or selection bias that can arise due to user drift and show how intervention-dependent shifts can inflate or attenuate observed differences in user responses under intervention. To diagnose confounding, we propose using negative control outcomes--attributes that should remain invariant under intervention--to identify distribution shifts across intervention conditions, providing evidence of user drift. To mitigate drift, we study adjusting the persona specification by eliciting additional confounders, finding that targeted, setting-relevant confounders can substantially reduce bias across survey-style and multi-turn agent evaluations.

Preconditioned optimizers are central to language model training, but their stochastic update rules are usually treated as direct approximations to population preconditioned descent. We show that this view misses two finite-sample biases. First, the gradient and preconditioner are typically estimated from the same minibatch, introducing gradient--preconditioner coupling bias. Second, even when the preconditioner estimate is unbiased, its inverse or inverse-root is generally biased because inversion is nonlinear. We propose a single-batch bias-correction framework that addresses both effects: cross-fitted preconditioning estimates the numerator and preconditioner from independent microbatch groups, while variance-corrected inversion uses microbatch variability to subtract the leading delta-method bias term. The framework applies to diagonal moment, diagonal curvature, and matrix preconditioning methods, instantiated in AdamW, Sophia, and Shampoo. Bias correction reduces held-out pretraining loss on Qwen2.5-0.5B by $0.15$, $0.07$, and $0.11$ nats, respectively; the effects on mixed-quality pretraining and downstream instruction tuning are consistently neutral-to-positive. Together, these results establish bias correction as a practical mechanism for reducing finite-sample update bias and improving the performance of preconditioned optimizers.

Estimation under model misspecification arises in many signal processing problems, where the assumed observation model deviates from the true data-generating mechanism due to errors or simplifications. The misspecified Cramér-Rao bound (MCRB) is a widely recognized mean-squared-error (MSE) lower bound for this case, which has originally been used to describe the asymptotic behavior of the misspecified maximum likelihood (MML) estimator. Despite its widespread use, the MCRB lacks a rigorous characterization of the class of estimators for which it is valid. In this paper, we revisit the theory of parameter estimation under model misspecification and re-examine the foundations of the MCRB. We first demonstrate these limitations and examine a naive version of the MCRB, which relies only on local misspecified unbiasedness. We show that this bound is generally not tight and may be unattainable. To obtain a meaningful bound, we develop a new derivation based on the concept of pointwise equivalent models. By maximizing the naive bound for these models, we recover the classical MCRB, now supported by a constructive derivation, an explicit characterization of the associated estimator class, and an equality condition. This formulation establishes a formal link between local unbiasedness conditions and achievable bounds, offering new insights into the MCRB structure and its relevance to practical estimators. Finally, we define the notion of an efficient misspecified estimator and show that if it exists, it is achieved by the MML estimator.

Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are increasingly estimated from observational data and used to guide policy and individualized treatment decisions. Before such estimates can be trusted in practice, their predictive fitness needs to be assessed, yet observational data alone offer limited opportunities for doing so. We propose CATE Assessment via Fitness Evaluation (CAFE), a formal framework for directly assessing the goodness-of-fit of a CATE estimate learned from observational data, rather than the full underlying outcome model, using evidence from a randomized trial. CAFE partitions the trial covariate space according to estimated propensity scores (or the like) and compares observationally derived conditional treatment effects with group-level experimental averages. The framework accommodates a broad class of CATE learners, including parametric models and flexible machine learning methods such as causal forest and boosting. We establish theoretical guarantees under both the null and alternative hypotheses, and introduce a maximum-type extension to improve sensitivity to localized lack of fit. When both randomized trial and observational data are available, we further develop a two-stage procedure to detect the existence of unobserved confounders. Extensive numerical studies show the utility of the CAFE approach when assessing observational-derived CATE estimates.

Interpretable text representations should expose coordinates that are not only predictive, but also meaningful enough for independent auditors to apply. Existing discriminative representations often use anonymous embedding directions, while concept-bottleneck and LLM-assisted methods attach natural-language names to features without ensuring that those definitions are reproducible or distinct from the target label. We propose an operational criterion for interpretable discriminative text representations: each coordinate should satisfy conceptual clarity, measured by chance-adjusted agreement between independent annotators applying the feature definition, and label disentanglement, meaning the feature should not merely paraphrase the prediction target. We instantiate this criterion in LLM-assisted Feature Discovery (LFD), an iterative method that proposes lexical and semantic features from contrastive outcome-opposed text pairs, screens candidates using cross-LLM Cohen's $κ$, and selects features by residual held-out predictive gain. A stylized analysis connects the $κ$ screen to a per-feature annotation-noise bound, formalizing agreement as a reliability check. Across ten text-classification tasks spanning seven corpora, LFD matches the predictive performance of a strong text bottleneck baseline while producing substantially clearer and less label-entangled features. Human audits with 232 raters show that LFD features achieve higher human--human and human--LLM agreement than baseline concepts, and raters consistently judge them as less label-leaking. These results suggest that agreement-tested, label-disentangled coordinates provide a practical auditability standard for interpretable text classification.

During an infectious disease outbreak, providing accurate answers to policy questions about transmission requires a detailed model of the natural history of infectiousness. Unfortunately, direct measures of infectiousness are generally unavailable. Instead, we often rely on indirect proxies, such as viral load measured by PCR or antigen tests, viral culture to detect replication-competent virus, or symptom onset, each of which reflects different aspects of viral dynamics or host response. However, these proxies vary in terms of the ease of collection, scalability, and their relationship to viral shedding and therefore underlying infectiousness. Here, we use data from five prospective, densely sampled cohorts with longitudinal data on multiple proxies of viral shedding for approximately 2,000 infections to develop a Bayesian joint model for the within-host viral kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Modeling the joint distribution allows us to infer the trajectory of infectious virus shedding -- the most direct correlate of infectiousness -- for individuals who contribute only PCR data, and to compute derived quantities that are inaccessible from any single proxy alone. These include the population-level probability and expected duration of ongoing infectiousness as a function of time since diagnosis, stratified by variant, vaccination status, and infection history; the residual risk of releasing an individual from isolation; and personalized, real-time estimates of infectiousness that are sequentially updated as new test results become available.

Distributed principal component analysis (PCA) produces node-level estimates of both a mean vector and a principal subspace. Robustly aggregating these heterogeneous objects requires a relative scale between mean error and subspace error. We study a scale-calibrated median-of-means estimator for this problem using the product geometry of Euclidean space and the Grassmann manifold. A node-level PCA expansion shows that the mean component has the usual linear influence, whereas the subspace component is an eigengap-weighted covariance perturbation. We prove a local reduction showing that the proposed product-manifold median-of-means estimator is asymptotically equivalent to a scaled spatial median of node influence errors. This yields fixed-node non-Gaussian limits, growing-node Gaussian limits with finite-block bias, and an explicit scale-dependent covariance formula. We propose robust block-scale and inference-optimal calibration rules, establish high-probability median-of-means bounds, characterize factorwise bad-node influence, and prove node-bootstrap validity. Simulations and large-scale single-cell RNA-seq data show that scale calibration adapts to eigengap-driven subspace uncertainty and provides a robust distributed PCA summary.

We develop joint confidence regions for linear regression coefficients when the regressors and errors are jointly stationary and ergodic with unspecified serial dependence. The method applies random smoothing, using an independent auxiliary sample and shrinking bandwidth, to a vector of regression and second-moment statistics. Under stationarity, ergodicity, and finite second moments, the estimator is asymptotically normal and yields Wald confidence regions and simultaneous confidence intervals without direct long-run variance estimation or a parametric dependence model. For implementation, we introduce a scaled estimator with data-driven bandwidth selection and a mild truncation that improves finite-sample stability. Simulations under ARMA, ARFIMA, copula-based Markov errors, and fractional Gaussian noise, with Gaussian and heavy-tailed margins, show near-nominal coverage and competitive region volumes relative to Newey-West HAC and MAC. A winter Beijing PM2.5 application illustrates the procedure. Keywords: Random smoothing, Joint inference, Confidence regions, Dependent errors, Long memory, Regression inference

Propensity score (PS) methods are widely used in observational studies to reduce confounding and estimate causal treatment effects. However, the validity of PS-based causal estimators depends heavily on correct model specification, and model misspecification may lead to substantial bias and instability. In this study, we systematically evaluate the performance of commonly used causal estimators, including response surface modeling (RSM), inverse probability weighting (IPW), and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW), under varying levels of PS and outcome model misspecification. We compare classical logistic regression with several machine learning approaches for PS estimation, including random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Extensive simulation studies were conducted under multiple scenarios defined by combinations of correctly specified and misspecified PS and outcome models, varying sample sizes, and different covariate correlation structures. Estimator performance was assessed using bias, absolute bias, root mean squared error, empirical standard error, and confidence interval width. Results demonstrate that AIPW consistently provides robust and stable estimates across most scenarios due to its doubly robust property, whereas IPW is highly sensitive to PS misspecification and unstable PS estimates produced by flexible machine learning methods. RSM performs well only when the outcome model is correctly specified. Real-world applications using the ACTG175 clinical trial and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset further illustrate the practical implications of estimator choice and PS modeling strategy. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of integrating flexible machine learning approaches within doubly robust frameworks to improve causal effect estimation in observational studies.

Changepoints are essential for homogenizing categorical time series and analyzing their trends and variations. The original total cloud cover in Canada was recorded hourly in tenths (or eighths), exhibiting inherent seasonality and serial correlation. Lu and Wang (2012) introduced an extended cumulative logit model to detect shifts in the annual frequencies of cloud cover conditions. While annual aggregation mitigates seasonality and serial correlation, it shortens the time series and may lead to overdispersion. This article introduces a marginalized transition model to detect a single changepoint in periodic and serially correlated categorical time series. The model captures serial dependence using a first-order Markov chain and enables category-specific changepoint specification. To enhance computational efficiency, we develop a new parameter estimation procedure for obtaining maximum likelihood estimates. A maximally selected likelihood ratio test statistic is then proposed to test for sudden changes in categorical time series, and the method is illustrated using daily total cloud cover observations recorded at 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. at Fort St. John Airport, British Columbia, Canada.

Scalarization is widely used in multi-objective optimization owing to its simplicity and scalability. In many applications, the goal is to generate solutions that represent diverse user preferences, ideally with uniform coverage of the Pareto front (PF). However, uniformly sampling scalarization weights usually induces non-uniform coverage of the PF. We explain this mismatch through a geometric analysis of the scalarization path. As the scalarization weight varies, the corresponding solutions trace the PF with a generally non-uniform traversal speed. This speed induces an arc-length cumulative distribution function (CDF); inverting this CDF map yields a principled rule for selecting weights that produce uniform PF coverage. Building on this insight, we propose SURF (Sampling Uniformly along the PaReto Front). For structured problems, including bi-objective bandits, we derive closed-form expressions for this CDF map and the resulting PF-aware weight sampling rule. For general problems, SURF alternates between CDF reconstruction and weight sampling. Theoretically, we show that under provable conditions, SURF converges linearly to an unavoidable finite-sampling floor. Empirically, experiments on bandits, multi-objective-gymnasium, and multi-objective LLM alignment demonstrate that SURF efficiently achieves more uniform PF coverage than baselines.

Many functional datasets are observed sparsely and irregularly. Ordering such data is challenging because only limited information is available from each observation, while the underlying trajectories remain infinite-dimensional. This paper develops a novel depth notion for sparse functional data, called the conditional regularized halfspace depth (CRHD). CRHD is defined as the infimum of conditional halfspace probabilities of the underlying trajectory given the observed sparse measurements, thereby enabling depth evaluation directly at sparse observations without requiring trajectory reconstruction. We study several basic theoretical properties of CRHD that clarify its behavior as a depth measure. The proposed depth is applicable even to extremely sparsely observed functional data, overcoming key limitations of existing sparse functional depths that often rely on reconstructed curves. In addition, CRHD induces meaningful rankings for complex functional data. Its numerical performance is demonstrated through rank-based tests, and its practical utility is illustrated using an infant growth dataset.

We study design-unbiased estimation of the finite-population total $\sum_{i=1}^N y_i$ when each outcome satisfies known bounds $y_i\in[a_i,b_i]$. For any sampling design with inclusion probabilities $π_i>0$, we prove a sharp lower bound on the worst-case squared error over the rectangular parameter space. This bound is attained if and only if the unit inclusion indicators are pairwise independent, in which case the minimax estimator is the midpoint-differenced Horvitz-Thompson estimator $\sum_{i=1}^N m_i+\sum_{i\in S}(y_i-m_i)/π_i$, with $m_i=(a_i+b_i)/{2}$. We then solve the joint design-and-estimation problem under the constraint $\sum_i π_i\le n$. We find that a minimax strategy samples units independently with probabilities $π_i^\ast=\min(1,c (b_i-a_i))$ where $c>0$ is chosen so that $\sum_i π_i^\ast=n$, and uses the midpoint-differenced estimator. This extends Gabler (1990)'s linear minimax result to the full class of design-unbiased estimators. We also show that the estimator is admissible among unbiased estimators and affine equivariant.

Background: Often when undertaking meta-analyses of time-to-event (TTE) outcomes, especially in a Health Technology Assessment context, a hazard ratio (HR) scale is used. However, issues arise when there is evidence of non-proportional hazards in some of the studies included. A number of methods have been advocated, but their use has been limited by either their complexity and/or the ease with which their results can be used in HTA. An alternative approach is to assume a treatment-log(time) interaction within a Cox proportional hazards model for each study, and to then undertake a bivariate meta-analysis of the resulting treatment and interaction coefficients, so that an overall time-varying HR (TVHR) can be obtained. Methods: A TVHR approach was applied to a meta-analysis of chemotherapy compared to Standard of Care for advanced recurrent gastric cancer, and in which Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was an outcome. The approach was also applied to a network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluating overall survival (OS) in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. Results: Five trials in the advanced gastric cancer meta-analysis displayed evidence of non-proportional hazards for PFS. Using a TVHR model produced HRs ranging from 0.83 (CrI:0.75-0.91) at 0.5 years to 0.99 (CrI:0.79-1.23) at 3.5 years. Three studies showed evidence of non-proportional hazards in the advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma NMA for OS. Using a TVHR model, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated consistent superiority from month 7 onwards, with a HR improving from 0.37 (CrI:0.26-0.51) at one year to 0.24 (CrI:0.12-0.45) at five years. Conclusions: A TVHR approach to the meta-analysis or NMA of TTE outcomes when the proportional hazards assumption appears not to hold, produces an intuitive solution which can be readily used in HTA.

Modern matrix completion problems often involve heterogeneous data whose rows simultaneously belong to many meta-categories, such as demographic and age groups in recommendation systems, or region and recording session labels in neural electrophysiological experiments. Standard low-rank estimators impose a single global latent geometry, which can recover average structure but may smooth away subgroup-specific variation, especially when observations are unevenly distributed across groups. We introduce Group-Aware Matrix Estimation (GAME), a convex estimator for overlapping subgroup-wise low-rank matrix estimation. GAME regularizes category-specific submatrices through overlapping nuclear-norm penalties, allowing related groups to borrow information while preserving local latent structure in a shared coordinate system. We provide finite-sample guarantees for both reconstruction error and subgroup-specific subspace recovery, showing how performance depends on sampling density, subgroup rank, and overlap structure. Experiments on synthetic, recommendation, ecological, and neuroscience datasets show that GAME is most beneficial in structured missingness regimes, where subgroup-aware regularization improves both reconstruction accuracy and latent subspace fidelity. Across these benchmarks, GAME is competitive or best among global low-rank, side-information, and modern imputation baselines, with the largest gains when subgroups exhibit distinct low-rank structure.

Smooth functions on graphs have wide applications in manifold and semi-supervised learning. In this paper, we study a bandit problem where the payoffs of arms are smooth on a graph. This framework is suitable for solving online learning problems that involve graphs, such as content-based recommendation. In this problem, each recommended item is a node and its expected rating is similar to its neighbors. The goal is to recommend items that have high expected ratings. We aim for the algorithms where the cumulative regret would not scale poorly with the number of nodes. In particular, we introduce the notion of an effective dimension, which is small in real-world graphs, and propose two algorithms for solving our problem that scale linearly in this dimension. Our experiments on real-world content recommendation problem show that a good estimator of user preferences for thousands of items can be learned from just tens nodes evaluations.

Classical kernel density estimation usually derives the AMISE and optimal bandwidth from a pointwise Taylor expansion, which requires twice continuous differentiability. This assumption is stronger than necessary and excludes natural densities arising from threshold models, regime changes, and robust mixture models, where the first derivative may be Lipschitz while the curvature is kinked, discontinuous, or only weakly defined. We show that the classical AMISE theory remains valid under the weaker condition $f\in C^{1,1}(\mathbb{R})$. The pointwise $C^2$ Taylor expansion is replaced by an integral Taylor representation based on the weak second derivative, so that $R(f'')$ is interpreted as a weak-curvature functional. Under $f\in C^{1,1}(\mathbb{R})$ and $f''\in L^2(\mathbb{R})$, we recover the classical AMISE formula, the $n^{-1/5}$ optimal bandwidth, and Epanechnikov kernel optimality without assuming a continuous classical second derivative. We also propose a generalized-curvature plug-in bandwidth selector, prove its first-order AMISE equivalence under ratio-consistent curvature estimation, and establish consistency of a leave-one-out U-statistic curvature estimator. A multivariate extension using weak Hessians recovers the scalar-bandwidth rate $n^{-4/(d+4)}$.

Many recent flow-matching and diffusion-style generative models rely on auxiliary stochastic dynamics during training: a richer process is simulated to define conditional targets, but the auxiliary state is either intractable to sample at generation time or simply not part of the desired output. Existing Generator Matching theory formalises conditioning on static latent random variables, and several recent papers prove special cases of projection results for particular augmented-state constructions. We introduce latent process generator matching, a general framework that treats the observed generative state as a deterministic image $X_t=Φ(Y_t)$ of a tractable Markov process $Y_t$. We show that in this setting one may learn the generator of a stochastic process on the image space which has the same one-time marginal distributions as the projected process. This generalizes and subsumes the discrete latent process results from the literature, and extends Generator Matching from static latent variables to a rich family of time-dependent latent conditional processes.

Transfer learning is an essential technique for many machine learning/AI models of complex structures such as large language models and generative AI. The essence of transfer learning is to leverage knowledge from resolved source tasks for a new target task, especially when the sample size $m$ of the training data for the latter is low. In this work, we rigorously analyze the potential benefit of transfer learning in terms of sample efficiency. Specifically, taking an optimal transport viewpoint of transfer learning, we find that when the data dimension $d$ is higher than $3$, the sample complexity for transfer learning is $O(m^{-(α+1)/d})$, with $α$ indicating the smoothness of the data distribution, as opposed to the $O(m^{-p/d})$ sample complexity for direct learning with $p$ indicating the smoothness of the optimal target model. Our finding theoretically supports a better sample efficiency for transfer learning, when the target task is optimizing over a family of not-so-smooth models (i.e., highly complex networks with the possible use of non-smooth activation functions). Using image classification as an example, we numerically demonstrate the sample efficiency for transfer learning, that is, in the data hungry regime, the model performance can be significantly improved by transfer learning.

The expected signature uniquely determines the law of a random rough path under a moment-growth condition, yet finite-sample bounds for estimating it from a single long dependent trajectory have been lacking. We study a stationary stochastic process whose sample paths can be interpreted as geometric rough paths, partitioned into blocks of equally-spaced observations, and prove a non-asymptotic mean-squared error bound for the block-averaging estimator. Rough-path theory is required for the estimand to be well-defined when paths have Hölder regularity at most $1/2$, because Young and Riemann--Stieltjes integration cannot define the signature's iterated integrals. Under moment and stationarity assumptions together with a covariance-decay condition on block signatures -- strictly weaker than $α$-mixing and applicable to long-range-dependent drivers -- the error separates into a discretization term and a fluctuation term, with rates determined respectively by path regularity and dependence strength. A level-wise rough-factorial variance analysis keeps finite-truncation constants explicit and yields an optimal allocation rule under a fixed observation budget. We verify the assumptions for fractional Ornstein--Uhlenbeck processes in three regimes, namely rough (Hurst $H<1/2$), semimartingale ($H=1/2$), and long-range ($H>1/2$). Monte Carlo experiments show empirical convergence rates faster than the theoretical upper bounds.

Background: Days Alive and at Home (DAH) over a pre-defined follow-up period is a novel post-intervention composite outcome that combines data from at least three components: (i) initial length of hospital stay, (ii) length of total readmissions or other post-discharge care and (iii) mortality. Missing values bring unique challenges to the analysis of trials with the DAH outcome as the three components may have different rates of missingness caused by distinct missing data mechanisms. Current approaches define DAH as missing if any of the components are missing, and proceed with complete cases or Multiple Imputation (MI) of the composite. Methods: Through a simulation study motivated by the NOTACS trial, we compare several methods of handling missing data, including complete case analysis, MI of the composite, and MI of the components when the primary analysis is a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. Results: MI on the component level has good properties in terms of type I error control and power. We caution against the use of MI on the composite level with Predictive Mean Matching, which can lead to type I error inflation. Conclusions: Given the complex distributional characteristics of DAH, naive approaches such as defining missingness on the composite level and directly imputing the composite with Predictive Mean Matching, can lead to type I error inflation. Imputing on the component level is recommended, suggested future work included imputation approaches that are compatible with more complex definitions of DAH, as well as recommendations for sensitivity analyses to the Missing at Random assumption.

We analyze the filing-side legal infrastructure of eviction using 755,004 Philadelphia Municipal Court landlord-tenant records filed between 1969 and 2022, of which 747,125 are residential. Eviction in Philadelphia is organized upstream by a concentrated plaintiff-side bar, durable plaintiff-attorney dependence, repeated use of the same properties, and recurring tenant-name exposure. Between 1983 and 2022, the ten most active plaintiff attorneys handled 82.2% of represented plaintiff-side cases per year on average, compared with 14.8% for the ten most active plaintiffs. Large plaintiffs depend heavily on a single attorney: among plaintiffs filing at least 101 cases, 78.3% of each plaintiff's filings are handled by that plaintiff's most-used attorney, on average. Repetition is likewise central to the docket. Across the residential filing universe, 48.8% of cases occur at addresses with a prior filing in the preceding year, and 23.6% at addresses with six or more prior filings; these repeats are usually filed by the same plaintiff and follow a more default-heavy, less agreement-heavy pathway. We further examine a narrower mechanism: strict switches into specialist plaintiff-side counsel, defined as a plaintiff changing attorney to one in the prior-year top ten. Filing counts rise around the switch with non-flat pre-trends, indicating organizational reconfiguration rather than a clean exogenous shock. Within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-property comparisons yield more stable estimates: judgment by agreement, fee share, waiver language, and corrected lockout-trigger language decline, while deadline language rises. We interpret eviction as a layered upstream process in which concentrated counsel, repeated places, and recurring tenants produce filings before any courtroom bargaining or adjudication occurs.

In machine learning, privacy requirements at inference or deployment time often evolve due to changing policies, regulations, or user preferences. In this work, we aim to construct a magnitude of models to satisfy any target differential privacy (DP) requirement without additional training, given a set of existing models trained on the same dataset with different privacy/utility tradeoffs. We propose two post-processing techniques, namely random selection and linear combination, to generate final private models satisfying any target privacy parameter. We provide privacy accounting of these approaches from the lens of R'enyi DP and privacy loss distributions on general problems, as well as on private mean estimation, where we precisely characterize the privacy/utility tradeoffs and compare the two mechanisms. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches and validate our analyses on several models and both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Net benefit is widely used and reported to evaluate the clinical utility of prediction models, yet its interpretation often remains difficult in practice. In this didactical note, we develop two complementary interpretations that make net benefit easier to understand for clinical audiences. We show that comparisons with treat-none and treat-all can be expressed through threshold-specific observed risk in patients above and below the decision threshold, linking decision-curve performance to calibration in clinically relevant subgroups. We also show how net benefit relates to positive predictive value, offering a more intuitive explanation of when acting on model predictions is justified. We derive and illustrate these results and propose positive predictive value curves as a practical complement to decision curves.

We construct and analyze generative diffusions that transport a point mass to a prescribed target distribution over a finite time horizon using the stochastic interpolant framework. The drift is expressed as a conditional expectation that can be estimated from independent samples without simulating stochastic processes. We show that the diffusion coefficient can be tuned \emph{a~posteriori} without changing the time-marginal distributions. Among all such tunings, we prove that minimizing the impact of estimation error on the path-space Kullback--Leibler divergence selects, in closed form, a Föllmer process -- a diffusion whose path measure minimizes relative entropy with respect to a reference process determined by the interpolation schedules alone. This yields a new variational characterization of Föllmer processes, complementing classical formulations via Schrödinger bridges and stochastic control, and provides a conditional-expectation representation of the Föllmer drift that enables simulation-free estimation from data. We further establish that, under this optimal diffusion coefficient, the path-space Kullback--Leibler divergence becomes independent of the interpolation schedule, rendering different schedules statistically equivalent in this variational sense. We provide numerical experiments to illustrate the impact of path-space variational optimality of Föllmer's processes in probabilistic forecasting and data assimilation applications.

Causal discovery is a data-driven paradigm for analyzing complex systems, while physics-based models, such as ordinary differential equations (ODEs), provide mechanistic structure for real-world dynamical processes. Integrating these paradigms can improve identifiability, stability, and robustness. However, real dynamical systems often exhibit cyclic interactions and nonstationarity, whereas many causal discovery methods rely on acyclicity, stationarity, or equilibrium assumptions. We propose an integrative causal discovery framework for dynamical systems that leverages partial physical knowledge through stochastic differential equations (SDEs). The drift term encodes known ODE dynamics, while the diffusion term captures unknown causal couplings beyond the prescribed physics. We develop a scalable sparsity-inducing maximum quasi-likelihood estimator with a theoretically justified stabilization technique to improve the optimization landscape. Under mild conditions, we establish causal graph recovery guarantees for both stable and unstable SDEs. We also analyze robustness of our causal graph estimate to ODE misspecification and clarify how the introduced stabilization technique balances numerical stability and statistical recoverability. Experiments on linear SDEs and nonlinear benchmarks, including Lotka-Volterra and Lorenz dynamics with acyclic and cyclic structures, show improved graph recovery and robustness over data-driven baselines. We also demonstrate practical utility on real-world epidemic data by reconstructing stochastic SIR dynamics within our causal discovery framework.

OBJECTIVE: To propose time-to-event estimators that help evaluate incident diagnostic coding and possible upcoding in Medicare as well as introduce an open-source software package that enables more reproducible methods development relevant to Medicare billing behavior. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Observational analysis of simulated upcoding based on coding by insurers or providers that may be incentivized by Medicare Advantage risk adjustment. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Two years of separately simulated incident health condition coding data for a Medicare Advantage population and a Traditional Medicare population where coding patterns are aligned with known practices in each program. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We propose several novel time-to-event estimators of incident coding intensity and possible upcoding in Medicare Advantage, including accounting for unreliable reporting. We demonstrate estimator performance in simulated data leveraging the National Institutes of Health's All of Us study and also develop an open source R package to simulate longitudinal realistic labeled upcoding data, which were not previously available for researchers. In simulations, our novel estimators recovered differences in upcoding within and across monitoring periods. Undercoding had a limited effect on our novel estimators while an existing estimator was more sensitive to undercoding. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed estimators can help researchers and policymakers track new coding behaviors (e.g., as may be incentivized by risk adjustment formula updates) earlier and at scale while accounting for several real-world data considerations. Further, the R package we provide can be used to improve the development, accessibility, and reproducible evaluation of coding intensity and upcoding methodology.

We study various types of consistency of honest decision trees and random forests in the regression setting. In contrast to related literature, our proofs are elementary and follow the classical arguments used for smoothing methods. Under mild regularity conditions on the regression function and data distribution, we establish weak and almost sure convergence of honest trees and honest forest averages to the true regression function, and moreover we obtain uniform convergence over compact covariate domains. The framework naturally accommodates ensemble variants based on subsampling and also a two-stage bootstrap sampling scheme. Our treatment synthesizes and simplifies existing analyses, in particular recovering several results as special cases. The elementary nature of the arguments clarifies the close relationship between data-adaptive partitioning and kernel-type methods, providing an accessible approach to understanding the asymptotic behavior of tree-based methods.

The Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Ginibre (FKG) inequality is an invaluable tool in monotone spin systems satisfying the FKG lattice condition, which provides positive correlations for all coordinate-wise increasing functions of spins. This inequality has numerous applications and plays an integral role in the proof of various central limit theorems (CLTs), including recent work on ferromagnetic exponential random graph models (ERGMs) wherein a Hamiltonian tilt promotes the presence of small subgraphs like triangles. However, the FKG lattice condition fails to hold when confining a spin system to a particular phase in the low-temperature regime of parameters. Thus it is not a priori clear if each phase internally has positive correlations for increasing functions, or if the positive correlations in the overall model (which is a mixture of phases) arise primarily from the global choice of phase. In this article, we show that the individual phases in ERGMs do indeed satisfy an approximate form of the FKG inequality internally. We use this to finish the proof of various CLTs within each individual phase in the phase-coexistence regime, answering a question posed by Bianchi, Collet, and Magnanini. We present the FKG inequality for ERGMs as a consequence of a more general result which holds under certain inputs related to metastable mixing; we expect this general result to be widely applicable, and we devote a section to spelling out the details of its application to a class of generalized higher-order ferromagnetic Curie-Weiss models where the necessary inputs are relatively transparent.

Discovering discrete algebraic rules from data is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. We formalize this problem through Cayley-table completion -- an algebraic counterpart to classical matrix completion -- where the degree of associativity violation replaces linear rank as the intrinsic measure of complexity. We provide a rigorous landscape analysis of HyperCube, an operator-valued tensor factorization, on the fully observed target table $δ$, proving that its global infimum $H_{\inf}(δ) := \inf_{Θ\in F_δ} H(Θ)$ implicitly defines an exact differentiable measure for this complexity. We show that HyperCube's native objective $H(Θ)$ decomposes into two components: geometric alignment (collinearity) and an inverse $\ell_2$ penalty. We establish that these continuous variational pressures induce core discrete properties: collinearity enforces associativity (Collinearity--Associativity Equivalence), and the inverse $\ell_2$ penalty reduces to an exact inverse rank penalty within the collinear manifold, driving the parameters toward full-rank unitarity. Consequently, we derive an absolute lower bound $H(Θ) \ge H_{\inf}(δ) \ge 3 \, |δ|$, where $|δ|$ is the target table size. We prove this absolute floor is attained if and only if the target is isotopic to a group, and characterize the global minimizer as the regular representation of the underlying group (up to unitary gauge), resolving the central open conjecture of Huh (2025). This work serves as an existence proof that certain discrete algebraic structures can be exactly characterized by differentiable measures, enabling gradient-based discovery without the need for combinatorial search. All theoretical results are mechanically verified in Lean 4 and confirmed via small-scale experiments.

Determining whether vaccine efficacy wanes is important for individual and public decision making. Yet, quantification of waning is a subtle task. The classical approaches cannot be interpreted as measures of declining efficacy unless we impose unreasonable assumptions. Recently, formal causal estimands designed to quantify vaccine waning have been proposed. These estimands can be bounded under weaker assumptions, but the bounds are often too wide to make claims about the presence of waning. We propose a different approach: a formal test to assess whether a treatment effect is constant over time at the individual level. This test provides a considerable power gain over existing approaches and is valid under interpretable assumptions in vaccine trials. We illustrate the increase in power through real and simulated examples, using three different approaches to compute the test statistics. Two of these approaches are based solely on summary data, accessible from existing clinical trials. Beyond our test, we also give new results that bound the waning effect. We use our methods to reanalyze data from a randomized controlled trial of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. While prior analysis did not establish waning, our test rejects the null hypothesis of no waning.

Variational inference (VI) is a cornerstone of modern Bayesian learning, enabling approximate inference in complex models. However, its formulation depends on expectations and divergences defined through high-dimensional integrals, often rendering analytical treatment impossible and necessitating heavy reliance on approximations. Possibility theory, an imprecise probability framework, allows us to directly model epistemic uncertainty instead of relying on a subjective interpretation of probabilities. While this framework provides robustness and interpretability under sparse or imprecise information, adapting VI to the possibilistic setting requires rethinking core concepts such as divergences, which presuppose additivity. In this work, we develop a principled formulation for performing possibilistic VI by establishing a maxitive analogue of the classical Donsker-Varadhan formulation. The resulting framework enables us to derive a learning rule for possibilistic VI with exponential-family candidates and practical update rules for neural-network training, giving rise to a family of optimizers termed CBOpt. Finally, we demonstrate that CBOpt achieves competitive performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain image classification tasks.

This paper investigates a recursive formulation of auto-regressive multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression in the challenging setting of noisy and non-nested high- and low-fidelity data. We propose a decoupled optimization strategy based on the expectation-maximization algorithm, which exploits the structure of the recursive model. In particular, we derive closed-form update formulas when the scaling factor is modeled as a parametric linear predictor. This approach is compared with the fully coupled likelihood maximization of the classical non-recursive formulation introduced by Kennedy and O'Hagan. A series of benchmark experiments, covering applications of increasing complexity, highlights the performance of both approaches. The results demonstrate that the proposed recursive strategy significantly reduces training time, especially when large low-fidelity datasets are available, while maintaining competitive predictive accuracy and uncertainty estimation.

The problem of super-resolution, roughly speaking, is to reconstruct an unknown signal to high accuracy, given (potentially noisy) information about its low-degree Fourier coefficients. Prior results on super-resolution have imposed strong modeling assumptions on the signal, typically requiring that it is a linear combination of spatially separated point sources. In this work we analyze a very general version of the super-resolution problem by considering completely general non-negative signals (equivalently, distributions) over the $d$-dimensional torus $[0,1)^d$; we do not assume any spatial separation between point sources, or even that the distribution is a finite linear combination of point sources. The question naturally arises: what can be said about super-resolution in such a general setting? - As a warm-up, we first give a set of results for reconstructing distributions under the Wasserstein distance. We establish essentially matching upper and lower bounds on the cutoff frequency $T$ and the magnitude $κ$ of the noise for which accurate reconstruction is possible: we show that for $d$-dimensional distributions, estimates of $\approx \exp(d)$ many Fourier coefficients are both necessary and sufficient for accurate Wasserstein reconstruction. - As our main result, we define a new notion of "heavy hitter" reconstruction for distributions, which essentially amounts to achieving high-accuracy reconstruction of all "sufficiently dense" regions of the distribution. We give essentially matching upper and lower bounds on the cutoff frequency $T$ and the magnitude $κ$ of the noise for which accurate reconstruction is possible under this notion. Our results show that (in sharp contrast with Wasserstein reconstruction) accurate estimates of only $\approx \exp(\sqrt{d})$ many Fourier coefficients are both necessary and sufficient for heavy hitter reconstruction.

Detecting multimodality in empirical distributions is a fundamental problem in statistics and data analysis, with applications ranging from clustering to the study of complex systems. In practice, however, assessing departures from unimodality in a consistent and comparable way remains challenging. Widely used methods such as Hartigan and Hartigan's Dip Test illustrate these difficulties, as the interpretation of their statistics depends strongly on sample size, requires calibration to determine significance, and, for large samples, exhibit increasing sensitivity, leading to rejection of unimodality for arbitrarily small deviations from the null. We introduce Z-Dip, a standardized measure of multimodality that addresses these limitations. By treating the Dip statistic as a random variable under the null hypothesis of unimodality and standardizing its observed value, the proposed approach yields scores that are directly comparable across datasets of different sizes. Using simulation-based calibration, we derive a universal decision threshold that closely reproduces classical Dip Test decisions without requiring sample-size-specific adjustments. Extensive validation on simulated data and on more than 88,000 empirical opinion distributions shows near-perfect agreement with the classical Dip Test while providing a more interpretable and comparable measure of modality. Finally, we propose a downsampling-based correction that mitigates residual sensitivity in extremely large samples. Open-source software and reference tables are provided to facilitate practical adoption.

The analysis of platform trials can be enhanced by utilizing non-concurrent controls. Since including this data might also introduce bias in the treatment effect estimators if time trends are present, methods for incorporating non-concurrent controls adjusting for time have been proposed. However, so far their behavior has not been systematically investigated in platform trials that include interim analyses. To evaluate the impact of an interim analysis in trials utilizing non-concurrent controls, we consider a platform trial featuring two experimental arms and a shared control, with the second experimental arm entering later. We focus on a frequentist regression model that uses non-concurrent controls to estimate the treatment effect of the second arm and adjusts for time using a step function to account for temporal changes. We show that performing an interim analysis in Arm 1 may introduce bias in the point estimation of the effect in Arm 2, if the regression model is used without adjustment, and investigate how the marginal bias and bias conditional on the first arm continuing after the interim depend on different trial design parameters. Moreover, we propose a new estimator of the treatment effect in Arm 2, aiming to eliminate the bias introduced by both the interim analysis in Arm 1 and the time trends, and evaluate its performance in a simulation study. The newly proposed estimator is shown to substantially reduce the bias and type I error rate inflation while leading to power gains compared to an analysis using only concurrent controls.

Variational inference, as an alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, has played a transformative role in enabling scalable computation for complex Bayesian models. Nevertheless, existing approaches often depend on either rigid model-specific formulations or stochastic black-box optimization routines. Tangent approximation is a principled class of structured variational methods that exploits the geometry of the underlying probability model. However, its utility has largely been confined to logistic regression and related modeling regimes. In this article, we propose a novel variational framework based on tangent transformation for a broad class of probability models characterized by strongly super-Gaussian likelihoods. Our method leverages convex duality to construct tangent minorants of the log-likelihood, thereby inducing conjugacy with Gaussian priors over model parameters in an otherwise intractable setup. Under mild assumptions on the data-generating mechanism, we establish algorithmic convergence guarantees, a contribution that stands in contrast to the limited theoretical assurances typically available for black-box variational methods. Additionally, we derive near-minimax optimal bounds for the variational risk. Superior performance of our proposed methodology is illustrated on simulated and real-data scenarios that challenge state-of-the-art variational algorithms in terms of scalability and their ability to consistently capture complex underlying data structure.

Langevin algorithms are popular Markov chain Monte Carlo methods that are often used to solve high-dimensional large-scale sampling problems in machine learning. The most classical Langevin Monte Carlo algorithm is based on the overdamped Langevin dynamics. There are many variants of Langevin dynamics that often show superior performance in practice. In this paper, we provide a unified approach to study the acceleration of the variants of the overdamped Langevin dynamics through the lens of large deviations theory. Numerical experiments using both synthetic and real data are provided to illustrate the efficiency of these variants.

In graph-based data analysis, $k$-nearest neighbor ($k$NN) graphs are widely used due to their adaptivity to local data densities. Allowing weighted edges in the graph, the kernelized graph affinity provides a more general type of $k$NN graph where the $k$NN distance is used to set the kernel bandwidth adaptively. In this work, we consider a general class of $k$NN graph where the graph affinity is $W_{ij} = ε^{-d/2} k_0 ( \| x_i - x_j \|^2 / εϕ( \hat ρ(x_i), \hat ρ(x_j) )^2 ) $, with $\hatρ(x)$ being the (rescaled) $k$NN distance at the point $x$, $ϕ$ a symmetric bi-variate function, and $k_0$ a non-negative function on $[0,\infty)$. Under the manifold data setting, where $N$ i.i.d. samples $x_i$ are drawn from a density $p$ on a $d$-dimensional unknown manifold embedded in a high dimensional Euclidean space, we prove the operator pointwise convergence of the $k$NN graph Laplacian to the limiting manifold operator (depending on $p$) at the rate of $O(N^{-2/(d+6)})$, up to a log factor, when $k_0$ and $ϕ$ have $C^3$ regularity and satisfy other technical conditions. This is obtained when $ε\sim N^{-2/(d+6)}$ and $k \sim N^{6/(d+6)}$, both at the optimal order to balance the theoretical bias and variance errors. Our improved convergence rate is based on a refined analysis of the $k$NN estimator, which can be of independent interest. We validate our theory by numerical experiments on simulated data.

Recent years have seen a surge in methods for two-sample testing, among which the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) test has emerged as an effective tool for handling complex and high-dimensional data. Despite its success and widespread adoption, the primary limitation of the MMD test has been its quadratic-time complexity, which poses challenges for large-scale analysis. While various approaches have been proposed to expedite the procedure, it has been unclear whether it is possible to attain the same power guarantee as the MMD test at sub-quadratic time cost. To fill this gap, we revisit the approximated MMD test using random Fourier features, and investigate its computational-statistical trade-off. We start by revealing that the approximated MMD test is pointwise consistent in power only when the number of random features approaches infinity. We then consider the uniform power of the test and study the time-power trade-off under the minimax testing framework. Our result shows that, by carefully choosing the number of random features, it is possible to attain the same minimax separation rates as the MMD test within sub-quadratic time. We demonstrate this point under different distributional assumptions such as densities in a Sobolev ball. Our theoretical findings are corroborated by simulation studies.

Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) is widely used for sequential optimization of expensive black-box functions. Although many upper bounds on its cumulative regret have been established in the literature, whether GP-UCB is minimax optimal remains open. We study this question through the effective optimism level, defined as the product of the exploration coefficient and the regularization parameter in kernel ridge regression. Under a uniform confidence assumption, we prove a new regret lower bound for GP-UCB with Matérn kernels. The bound shows that polynomial growth of the effective optimism level, up to logarithmic factors, rules out the minimax-optimal regret rate. Since this is the regime covered by most existing analyses, our result identifies a concrete obstacle to proving minimax optimality for standard GP-UCB. More broadly, it suggests that the gap between current upper bounds and minimax lower bounds may reflect a real limitation of the algorithm, not only of the analysis.

Implicit generative modeling (IGM) aims to produce samples of synthetic data matching the characteristics of a target data distribution. Recent work (e.g. score-matching networks, diffusion models) has approached the IGM problem from the perspective of pushing synthetic source data toward the target distribution via dynamical perturbations or flows in the ambient space. In this direction, we present the score difference (SD) between arbitrary target and source distributions as a flow that optimally reduces the Kullback-Leibler divergence between them. We apply the SD flow to convenient proxy distributions, which are aligned if and only if the original distributions are aligned. We demonstrate the formal equivalence of this formulation to denoising diffusion models under certain conditions. We also show that the training of generative adversarial networks includes a hidden data-optimization sub-problem, which induces the SD flow under certain choices of loss function when the discriminator is optimal. As a result, the SD flow provides a theoretical link between model classes that individually address the three challenges of the "generative modeling trilemma" -- high sample quality, mode coverage, and fast sampling -- thereby setting the stage for a unified approach.

This paper significantly improves on, and finishes to validate, an approach proposed in previous research in which safety outcomes were predicted from attributes with machine learning. Like in the original study, we use Natural Language Processing (NLP) to extract fundamental attributes from raw incident reports and machine learning models are trained to predict safety outcomes. The outcomes predicted here are injury severity, injury type, body part impacted, and incident type. However, unlike in the original study, safety outcomes were not extracted via NLP but were provided by independent human annotations, eliminating any potential source of artificial correlation between predictors and predictands. Results show that attributes are still highly predictive, confirming the validity of the original approach. Other improvements brought by the current study include the use of (1) a much larger dataset featuring more than 90,000 reports, (2) two new models, XGBoost and linear SVM (Support Vector Machines), (3) model stacking, (4) a more straightforward experimental setup with more appropriate performance metrics, and (5) an analysis of per-category attribute importance scores. Finally, the injury severity outcome is well predicted, which was not the case in the original study. This is a significant advancement.

While deep neural networks have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of domains, their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, and they are often regarded as black boxes. This gap between empirical performance and theoretical understanding poses a challenge analogous to the pre-axiomatic stage of classical geometry. In this work, we introduce the Pursuit of Subspaces (PoS) hypothesis, an axiomatic framework that formulates neural network behavior through a set of geometric postulates. These axioms, together with their derived consequences, provide a unified perspective on representation, computation, and generalization in both shallow and deep architectures. We show that this framework yields geometric explanations for fundamental questions in deep learning, including representation structure, architectural mechanisms, and generalization behavior, offering a principled step toward a coherent theoretical foundation.

The problem of detecting new signals in the presence of an unknown background is ubiquitous in scientific discoveries and is especially prominent in the physical sciences. Most solutions proposed thus far to address the problem focus on estimating the background distribution and using that estimate to infer the signal. By studying the geometry of the problem, this article demonstrates that estimating the background distribution is somewhat unnecessary for inferring the signal intensity. Instead, it suffices to estimate a single parameter, referred to as the compensator, to account for the incomplete knowledge on the background, substantially simplifying the problem's complexity and enabling proper uncertainty propagation. Such a compensator is shown to govern the conservativeness of the inference, both in the proposed setup and in likelihood-based approaches.

We address out-of-distribution (OOD) detection across the full spectrum of distribution shifts -- global domain changes, semantic divergence, texture differences, and covariate corruptions -- through a multi-encoder fusion of per-encoder representation-space diffusion models (RDMs). We statistically identify each encoder's sensitivity to specific shift types from ID data alone and introduce EncMin2L -- an encoder-agnostic two-level $\min(\cdot)$-gate that combines and calibrates per-encoder diffusion-based likelihood detectors without OOD labels, outperforming monolithic multi-encoder baselines at $2.3\times$ lower parameter cost. Two ID-data diagnostics: $η^2$ (class-conditional F-test) and $Δμ$ (log-likelihood shift under synthetic corruptions) -- quantify encoder specialization, while a Tippett minimum $p$-value combination aggregates per-encoder scores into a single, calibration-stable OOD signal. EncMin2L achieves $\geq 0.94$ AUROC across all four shift types simultaneously, outperforming the state-of-the-art representation-space diffusion OOD detectors across overlapping benchmarks.

Reliable assessment of tropical cyclone (TC) risk is limited by the brevity and spatial sparsity of the historical record, particularly for the rare, high-intensity landfalls that dominate insured loss. We present WHITS (Wind-focused Hurricane Interactive Track Simulator), a non-parametric semi-Markov track generator that extends the HITS framework of Nakamura et al. (2015) in three ways: transitions between historical track segments are conditioned on local wind speed in addition to position, age, and forward vector; the kernel selection on the comparative-vector term is sharpened to suppress dynamically inconsistent jumps; and a short smoothing window is applied across each transition to remove the position and wind discontinuities reported by downstream surge users. WHITS is fit to the full available best-track record in each of six basins in IBTrACS, extending in the North Atlantic to 1851 and in other basins to the earliest year of reliable best-track data. The resulting 10,000-yr global synthetic catalog reproduces observed track density and the annual hurricane/typhoon-force wind-hit probability across all basins. The catalog is intended for catastrophe-risk applications where a large, low-bias sample of physically plausible tracks is more useful than a small, statistically corrected one.

We study the contradiction graphs associated with binary concept classes. For a class $H \subseteq \{0,1\}^X$, the order-$m$ contradiction graph $G_m(H)$ has as vertices the $H$-realizable labeled sequences of length $m$, with two vertices adjacent when the two sequences assign opposite labels to some common domain point. Our main result is that the single graph $G_m(H)$ determines the threshold predicate $\mathrm{VCdim}(H)\ge m$. Consequently, the full sequence $(G_m(H))_{m \ge 1}$ determines the exact VC dimension and, in particular, detects finite versus infinite VC dimension, answering a question posed by Alon et al. (2024).

Accurately detecting home locations from GPS data generated by mobile devices is a foundational step in human mobility research, with significant implications for transportation planning, public health, and emergency response. However, existing home detection algorithms often produce unreliable results for noisy real-world data and are barely validated due to a lack of ground-truth benchmarks. To tackle these limitations, this study presents the development and validation of a Grid-based home detection via Stay-Time (GHOST) algorithm, implemented as an open-source Python package. The algorithm infers proxy home locations by identifying the most frequently visited nighttime or weekend daytime grid cells based on customizable spatial and temporal filters. To validate its performance, we use the large-scale BostonWalks dataset, which includes over 155,000 trips from 377 participants in the Boston metropolitan area, to test robustness to noisy data. Additionally, we collected a ground-truth dataset for ten volunteers across different regions in the U.S., including Florida, Mississippi, and Colorado, along with their self-reported home coordinates, to evaluate GHOST across diverse mobility patterns and sampling conditions. We compared GHOST accuracy to that of 5 well-established home detection algorithms: All-time clustering method, Stay-point method, DBSCAN, K-MEANS++, and SciKit-Mobility Home Detection, across multiple parameter settings. Results show that GHOST outperforms all algorithms in accuracy and robustness, with average errors as low as 22.3 meters under optimal configurations. Our findings highlight the high accuracy and flexibility of our algorithm, with grid size being the most influential parameter during validation, demonstrating the potential of this algorithm for real-world mobile location data analysis.

Infrastructure deterioration poses significant challenges for asset management, yet existing approaches rely on population-averaged models that overlook equipment-specific heterogeneity. We present a novel framework that combines Bayesian hierarchical hazard modeling with causal discovery to identify operational patterns that drive heterogeneous deterioration rates in pump equipment. Our approach first estimates pump-specific random effects $u_i$ using GPU-accelerated No-U-Turn Sampling (NUTS), achieving 3--5$\times$ speedup over CPU implementations. We then employ DirectLiNGAM to discover causal relationships between 22 engineered time-series features and deterioration rates, stratified by positive ($u_i > 0$, faster deterioration) versus negative ($u_i \leq 0$, slower deterioration) random effects. Analyzing 112 pumps with 92,861 observations over 650 days, we uncover striking heterogeneity: the negative group exhibits causal effects 400$\times$ larger than the positive group, with standard deviation (std) showing a strong positive causal effect ($+1.515$) on deterioration rates in low-risk equipment. We validate linearity assumptions through NonlinearLiNGAM comparison and demonstrate practical scalability through GPU acceleration. Our findings enable targeted maintenance strategies by revealing that different operational regimes require fundamentally distinct management approaches, advancing predictive maintenance from population-averaged to heterogeneity-aware decision making.

Simulating realistic wet and dry spells is central in weather generators and climate-impact studies. While finite-order Markov chains are standard, they often fail to reproduce persistent dry conditions due to their inherent subexponential decay. We model rainfall occurrence by introducing a duration-augmented binary Markov chain. We establish a link with alternating renewal chains, enabling flexible parametric modelling of wet and dry spell duration distribution. We model those using two regime-adapted specifications from the general class of extended Generalized Pareto Distributions, yielding flexible tail behaviour across various climates. We use estimation methods adapted to each specification. Our model is applied to around 200 stations in the South of Europe spanning diverse Mediterranean and continental climates. We compare this framework to standard Markov models in characterising persistence and high-quantile extrapolation. The approach is generic, extending naturally to multi-state settings or other binary sequence applications in environmental statistics.

Identifying latent variables and the causal structure involving them is essential across various scientific fields. While many existing works fall under the category of constraint-based methods (with e.g. conditional independence or rank deficiency tests), they may face empirical challenges such as testing-order dependency, error propagation, and choosing an appropriate significance level. These issues can potentially be mitigated by properly designed score-based methods, such as Greedy Equivalence Search (GES) (Chickering, 2002) in the specific setting without latent variables. Yet, formulating score-based methods with latent variables is highly challenging. In this work, we develop score-based methods that are capable of identifying causal structures containing causally-related latent variables with identifiability guarantees. Specifically, we show that a properly formulated scoring function can achieve score equivalence and consistency for structure learning of latent variable causal models. We further provide a characterization of the degrees of freedom for the marginal over the observed variables under multiple structural assumptions considered in the literature, and accordingly develop both exact and continuous score-based methods. This offers a unified view of several existing constraint-based methods with different structural assumptions. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Synthetic control methods can produce misleading counterfactual predictions when outcome series contain unit-specific stochastic trends, a common feature of nonstationary macroeconomic data. Existing remedies, such as pre-filtering or differencing, reduce spurious matching but may discard shared nonstationary variation that helps estimate donor weights. We propose Harmonic Synthetic Control (HSC), which replaces this binary choice with a soft allocation mechanism. HSC jointly estimates donor weights and a treated-unit-specific smooth residual component, then extrapolates this component into post-treatment periods using a time-series forecaster. A tuning parameter, selected by rolling-origin cross-validation, governs the division between donor matching and forecasting. As it varies, HSC continuously interpolates between synthetic control applied to differenced outcomes and synthetic control applied to raw outcomes with an intercept or trend. We provide a spectral interpretation showing how HSC downweights low-frequency residual components in donor matching and assigns them to the forecasting branch. A prediction-error decomposition separates weight-estimation distortion from residual-forecasting error. Monte Carlo exercises show that HSC adapts across regimes, performing well when stochastic trends are predominantly common or idiosyncratic, while estimators fixed to one regime can fail in the other.

Latent Gaussian models (LGMs) are a popular class of Bayesian hierarchical models that include Gaussian processes, as well as certain spatial models and mixed-effect models. Efficient Bayesian inference of LGMs often requires marginalizing out the latent variables. For LGMs with a non-Gaussian likelihood, exact marginalization is not possible and a popular approach is to do approximate marginalization with an integrated Laplace approximation (ILA). Using ILA produces an approximate posterior which, in some settings, can differ significantly from the correct posterior, which impacts downstream applications. We propose an importance sampling scheme to correct the error introduced by ILA. By increasing the number of samples in importance sampling, the posterior with ILA converges to the correct posterior. This idea is realized with various techniques, including pseudo-marginalization, quasi-Monte Carlo and randomized quasi-Monte Carlo. We implement our methods in an automatic differentiation framework to support gradient-based algorithms when doing inference on the hyperparameters. For the latter, we specifically consider the use of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We demonstrate the benefits of reduced error in various applied models.

This work addresses the challenges of robust covariance estimation and interpretable outlier detection for multivariate functional data with separable covariance structure. We develop a method that simultaneously improves robustness and interpretability in this context by establishing a connection between stochastic processes with separable covariance structures and the corresponding matrix-variate distribution of their basis representations. Leveraging this connection, we employ the recently developed matrix-variate counterpart of the Minimum Covariance Determinant estimator (MMCD) in conjunction with a truncated multivariate functional Mahalanobis semi-distance to robustly estimate mean and covariance for multivariate functional data. For interpretable outlier detection, we generalize multivariate outlier explanations based on Shapley values to decompose overall multivariate functional outlyingness into time-coordinate-specific contributions. Importantly, we reduce the otherwise exponential computational complexity (relative to the number of components) to linear complexity, while retaining the key properties of the Shapley value. This integrated framework combines robust Mahalanobis distances, MMCD estimators, and Shapley value-based outlyingness decomposition to provide a robust and interpretable approach for analyzing multivariate functional data with separable covariance structures. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through both theoretical analysis and practical applications, including simulations and real-world examples.

We develop a rigorous statistical theory of multi-head attention (MHA) as an ensemble of Nadaraya-Watson (NW) kernel regression estimators. Building on the algebraic identity between single-head softmax attention and the NW estimator, we prove that MHA is a structured ensemble of H NW estimators, each operating in a distinct learned projection subspace of the key space. We derive an explicit Bias-Variance-Covariance decomposition of the MHA mean squared error, showing that variance reduction depends not merely on the number of heads H but fundamentally on the decorrelation of head outputs. Decorrelation is governed by the principal angles between learned projection subspaces: orthogonal projections yield maximum variance reduction; aligned projections yield none. We introduce the Head Diversity Index (HDI), a computable spectral measure of inter-head decorrelation, and prove that MHA mean squared error is monotonically decreasing in HDI. This provides the first rigorous theoretical explanation for the empirically observed specialization of attention heads. Under a fixed total-dimension budget D = H * d_k, we solve the optimal head-dimension allocation problem, deriving the MSE-minimizing pair (H*, d_k*) from data distribution and regression smoothness. The solution yields a new architectural scaling law: the optimal per-head dimension grows logarithmically with training set size, while the optimal number of heads grows nearly linearly with the total budget D. Our framework unifies three strands of prior work: the NW theory of single-head attention, the general weighting theory for ensemble learning, and the decorrelation-variance-reduction isomorphism between biological and computational ensembles. Multi-head attention is the Transformer's instantiation of a universal principle: identical agents plus diversity-enforcing mechanisms yields emergent optimality.

A local specialist LLM, fine-tuned with reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) on operator-local data, is installed in a regulated organization with per-deployment error budget $α$. The operator needs a safety certificate for this deployment's stream at every round: no pooling across deployments, no waiting for a long-run average. Existing wrappers cannot deliver this on adaptive, online-updated streams: offline conformal-risk methods require exchangeability; online-conformal methods bound only long-run averages; non-exchangeable extensions are marginally valid; and the closest anytime wrapper, A-RCPS, controls marginal rather than selective risk. Using a (test statistic, validity guarantee, deployment rule) framework, we identify one empty cell forced by deployment requirements: e-process per threshold, selective risk, anytime-pathwise validity, max-certified-threshold rule. Conformal Selective Acting (CSA) fills it as a per-round wrapper maintaining a Ville-type e-process per threshold on a Bonferroni grid, evaluated against the RLVR filtration. Under predictable updates and isotonic-calibrated monotone risk we prove (i) an anytime-pathwise selective-risk bound $R_T^{\mathrm{act}}\leα+O(N_T^{-1/2})$, (ii) rate-optimal certification matching $Θ(\barη^{-2}\log(1/δ))$, and (iii) a horizon-independent release-rate gap. Across eight specialist benchmarks ($480$ streams), sixteen adversarial distribution-shift cells ($160$ streams), and five live Expert-Iteration RLVR cells with online LoRA over four base models in three architecture families ($10{,}300$ rounds), CSA is the only method among ten compared that satisfies pathwise validity and non-refusing deployment on every cell. We do not propose a new LLM, training algorithm, or policy class; CSA is the deployment-side complement, orthogonal to the model, for operators who cannot use a frontier API.

Many bandit deployments (recommendation, clinical dosing, ad targeting) share two facts prior work handles only in isolation: rewards live on a low-dimensional latent subspace, and that subspace drifts. Stationary low-rank bandits exploit rank but break under subspace change; non-stationary linear bandits adapt to drift but pay ambient rate $\widetilde{O}(d\sqrt{T})$. We study piecewise-stationary low-rank linear contextual bandits with scalar feedback: $θ_t = B_k^\star w_t$ with rank-$r$ factor $B_k^\star\in\mathbb{R}^{d\times r}$ constant within each of $K$ unknown segments and able to shift at boundaries. Our results are tight along three axes. (i) Identification boundary. With single-play scalar rewards, the moving subspace is recoverable through quadratic functionals of rewards iff three probe-side conditions hold: known noise variance, bounded state-noise coupling, and full-dimensional probe support. Each is necessary in the unrestricted-second-moment problem, and jointly they are sufficient, characterizing the boundary of the solvable region. (ii) Algorithm and dynamic regret. SPSC interleaves isotropic probes with windowed projected ridge-UCB exploitation inside the learned $r$-dimensional subspace; a CUSUM-style variant discovers segment boundaries online. The costed dynamic regret is $\widetilde{O}(r\sqrt{T})+\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3})+O(W\,V_{\mathrm{in}})$, replacing the ambient $d\sqrt{T}$ rate with the intrinsic rank. (iii) Empirics. On eleven benchmarks spanning synthetic, UCI/MovieLens, semi-synthetic clinical, and ZOZOTOWN production-log data, SPSC outperforms non-stationary and low-rank baselines whenever $d-r\gtrsim T^{1/6}$, matching the analytical crossover. To our knowledge, this is the first work to characterize the identification boundary and attain the intrinsic-rank dynamic-regret rate in this setting.

Inferring latent dynamics from multivariate time-series defined over topological cell complexes is crucial for capturing the complex, higher-order interactions inherent in real-world systems such as in water, sensor, and transportation networks. However, reconstructing these latent states is challenging because the signals are coupled across higher-order topologies, while high dimensionality, nonlinear observations, and unknown structures increase the difficulty. To address this, we propose a topology-aware state space framework derived from stochastic partial differential equations on cell complexes. State evolution follows heat-like topological diffusion, with perturbations propagating along boundary operators. Under partial observability, we model observations using a cell complex convolution of latent states coupled with a nonlinear mapping. We perform recursive state estimation via an Extended Kalman Filter, simultaneously learning model parameters and uncertainties through an online Expectation-Maximization algorithm. Finally, for scenarios where only lower-order topological structure is known, e.g., nodes and edges, as in critical infrastructure networks, we introduce a heuristic cell identification algorithm to explicitly infer the second-order cell structures. Validations on synthetic and real datasets from water, sensor and transportation networks demonstrate that our approach yields reliable estimates under partial observability and successfully recovers the underlying topological structures.

Many statistical problems can be addressed by applying a multiple testing procedure (MTP) that controls either the Family-wise Error Rate (FWER) or False Discovery Rate (FDR) under unknown arbitrarily-interdependent $p$-values, without explicitly modeling these inter-correlations. They include the FWER-controlling Bonferroni (1936) MTP and Holm (1979) MTP; the FDR-controlling Benjamini and Yekutieli (2001) MTP; and the DP-MTP (Karabatsos, 2025), based on a Dirichlet process (DP) prior distribution supporting the entire space of MTPs that control either the FWER or FDR. For such an MTP, this study introduces a new and congenial method for Bayesian predictive power analysis, for power calculation and sample size determination for any given planned future (e.g., replication or interim) study. This novel MTP predictive power analysis method is based on a joint prior distribution defining a scale matrix mixture of asymmetric multivariate normal mean-variance mixture distributions, factorized as a general prior distribution for effect sizes (e.g., obtained from expert judgment or results of prior studies), and a uniform prior distribution for correlation matrices representing arbitrary dependencies between $p$-values of test statistics of given multiple hypothesis tests under their alternative hypotheses. The new MTP power analysis method also results in $p$-value weights which can be used to minimize the relative impacts of and assess for significance-chasing biases (e.g., publication bias, $p$-hacking, etc.) in multiple testing, without needing to assume that $p$-values (effect sizes) are independent. The new simulation-based MTP predictive power analysis method is illustrated through the analysis of $p$-values obtained by a famous study of lead exposure and re-analyzed by the previous MTP literature, using R package bnpMTP.

In developing data-driven modeling methodologies, there is an ongoing need to reconcile the strong predictive performance of opaque black-box models with the transparency required for critical applications. This work introduces an interpretable and computationally tractable regression framework for heterogeneous data by combining response-informed spectral representation learning with localized additive modeling. The method first fits a random Fourier feature regression model and constructs a spectral feature map from the learned amplitudes and adaptively resampled frequencies, so that the representation reflects predictive variation in the data. This representation is then compressed by principal component analysis to obtain a low-dimensional latent embedding, in which a Gaussian mixture model performs soft regime discovery. Within each regime, a cluster-specific generalized additive model captures nonlinear covariate effects through interpretable spline-based univariate smooth functions. The final predictor is formed as a soft mixture of these local additive models, enabling flexible modeling of a nonlinear, heterogeneous structure while preserving interpretability. Numerical experiments across several benchmark regression datasets show that the proposed method consistently improves upon classical globally interpretable baselines while remaining competitive with more flexible black-box models. Overall, the framework provides a unified approach to heterogeneous regression that combines predictive adaptivity with interpretable local covariate effects.

Two-phase sampling offers a cost-effective way to validate error-prone covariate measurements in biomedical databases. Inexpensive or easy-to-obtain information is collected for the entire study in Phase I. Then, a subset of patients undergoes cost-intensive validation (e.g., expert chart review) to collect more accurate data in Phase II. When balancing primary and secondary analyses, competing models and priorities can result in poorly defined objectives for the most informative Phase II sampling criterion. Extreme tail sampling (ETS), wherein patients with the smallest and largest values of a particular quantity (like a covariate or residual) are selected, can offer great statistical efficiency in two-phase studies when focusing on a single analytic objective by targeting observations with the biggest contributions to the Fisher information. We propose an intuitive, easy-to-use approach that extends ETS to balance and prioritize explaining the largest amount of variability across multiple models of interest. Using principal components analysis, we succinctly summarize the inherent variability of all models' error-prone exposures. Then, we sample patients with the most extreme values of the first principal component for validation. Through extensive simulations and an application to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the proposed strategy offered simultaneous efficiency gains across multiple models of interest. Its advantages persisted across various real-world scenarios, including correlated or heterogeneous measurement error. When designing a validation study, concentrating on a single model may be short-sighted. Strategically allocating resources more broadly balances multiple analytical goals simultaneously. Employing dimension reduction before sampling will allow this strategy to scale up well to big-data applications with many error-prone exposures.

This Element offers a practical guide to estimating conditional marginal effects-how treatment effects vary with a moderating variable-using modern statistical methods. Commonly used approaches, such as linear interaction models, often suffer from unclarified estimands, limited overlap, and restrictive functional forms. This guide begins by clearly defining the estimand and presenting the main identification results. It then reviews and improves upon existing solutions, such as the semiparametric kernel estimator, and introduces robust estimation strategies, including augmented inverse propensity score weighting with Lasso selection (AIPW-Lasso) and double machine learning (DML) with modern algorithms. Each method is evaluated through simulations and empirical examples, with practical recommendations tailored to sample size and research context. All tools are implemented in the accompanying \texttt{interflex} package for \texttt{R}.

We consider a process $X^\ve$ that solves a stochastic Volterra equation with an unknown parameter $θ^\star$ in the drift function. The Volterra kernel is singular, and includes as an example, $K\_0(u)=c u^{α-1/2} \id{u>0}$ with $α\in (0,1/2)$. It is assumed that the diffusion coefficient is proportional to $\ve \to 0$. From an observation of the path $(X^\ve\_s)\_{s\in[0,T]}$, we construct a Trajectory Fitting Estimator, which is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. We also specify identifiability conditions insuring the $L^p$ convergence of the estimator.

Traditionally, studies in experimental physiology have been conducted in small groups of human participants, animal models or cell lines. Identifying optimal study designs that achieve sufficient power for drawing proper statistical inferences to detect group level effects with small sample sizes has been challenging. Moreover, average effects derived from traditional group-level inference do not necessarily apply to individual participants. Here, we introduce N-of-1 trials as an innovative study design that can be used to draw valid statistical inference about the effects of interventions on individual participants and can be aggregated across multiple study participants to provide population-level inferences more efficiently than standard group randomized trials. N-of-1 trials have been used in healthcare settings since the late 1980s, but without large-scale adoption and with few applications in experimental physiology research settings. In this manuscript, we introduce the key components and design features of N-of-1 trials, describe statistical analysis and interpretations of the results, and describe some available digital tools to facilitate their use using examples from experimental physiology.

This paper re-examines the limit theorems of Abadie and Imbens for nearest-neighbor matching estimators of average treatment effects with a fixed number of matches. We establish, for the first time, a non-normalized central limit theorem (CLT) with an explicitly calculated limiting variance. The key ingredients are to prove the convergence of the normalizing statistic appearing in the CLT of Abadie and Imbens to its mean, and to calculate the closed form of the limit of this mean. The former closes a gap in the argument of an unpublished work (Abadie and Imbens, 2002), while the latter resolves a question raised in Abadie and Imbens (2006).