Closed-source large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Gemini, are increasingly consulted for medical advice, yet their explanations may appear plausible while failing to reflect the model's underlying reasoning process. This gap poses serious risks as patients and clinicians may trust coherent but misleading explanations. We conduct a systematic black-box evaluation of faithfulness in medical reasoning among three widely used closed-source LLMs. Our study consists of three perturbation-based probes: (1) causal ablation, testing whether stated chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning causally influences predictions; (2) positional bias, examining whether models create post-hoc justifications for answers driven by input positioning; and (3) hint injection, testing susceptibility to external suggestions. We complement these quantitative probes with a small-scale human evaluation of model responses to patient-style medical queries to examine concordance between physician assessments of explanation faithfulness and layperson perceptions of trustworthiness. We find that CoT reasoning steps often do not causally drive predictions, and models readily incorporate external hints without acknowledgment. In contrast, positional biases showed minimal impact in this setting. These results underscore that faithfulness, not just accuracy, must be central in evaluating LLMs for medicine, to ensure both public protection and safe clinical deployment.

Generative real-world image super-resolution (Real-ISR) can synthesize visually convincing details from severely degraded low-resolution (LR) inputs, yet its stochastic sampling makes a critical failure mode hard to avoid: outputs may look sharp but be unfaithful to the LR evidence, exhibiting semantic or structural hallucinations. Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) is a natural fit because each LR input yields a rollout group of candidate restorations. However, effective alignment in Real-ISR is hindered by three coupled challenges: (i) the lack of an LR-referenced faithfulness signal that is robust to degradation yet sensitive to localized hallucinations, (ii) a rollout-group optimization bottleneck where scalarizing heterogeneous rewards before normalization compresses objective-wise contrasts and weakens DiffusionNFT-style reward-weighted updates, and (iii) limited coverage of real degradations, which restricts rollout diversity and preference signal quality. We propose LucidNFT, a multi-reward RL framework for flow-matching Real-ISR. LucidNFT introduces LucidConsistency, a degradation-invariant and hallucination-sensitive LR-referenced evaluator trained with content-consistent degradation pools and original-inpainted hard negatives; a decoupled reward normalization strategy that preserves objective-wise contrasts within each LR-conditioned rollout group before fusion; and LucidLR, a large-scale collection of real-world degraded images for robust RL fine-tuning. Extensive experiments show that LucidNFT improves perceptual quality on strong flow-based Real-ISR baselines while generally maintaining LR-referenced consistency across diverse real-world scenarios.

Foundation models for computational pathology are expected to facilitate the development of high-performing, generalisable deep learning systems. However, in addition to biologically relevant features, current foundation models also capture pre-analytic and scanner-specific variation that bias the predictions made by downstream task-specific models trained on these features. Here we show that introducing novel robustness losses during downstream model training reduces sensitivity to technical variability. A purpose-designed comprehensive experimentation setup with 27,042 whole-slide images from 6,155 patients is used to train thousands of models from the features of eight well-known foundation models for computational pathology. In addition to a substantial improvement in robustness, our approach improves classification accuracy by focusing on biologically relevant features. It mitigates robustness limitations of foundation models for computational pathology without retraining the foundation models themselves, enabling development of models that are more suitable in real-world clinical use.

Vision-Based Tactile Sensors (VBTS) are essential for achieving dexterous robotic manipulation, yet the tactile sim-to-real gap remains a fundamental bottleneck. Current tactile simulations suffer from a persistent dilemma: simplified geometric projections lack physical authenticity, while high-fidelity Finite Element Methods (FEM) are too computationally prohibitive for large-scale reinforcement learning. In this work, we present Tacmap, a high-fidelity, computationally efficient tactile simulation framework anchored in volumetric penetration depth. Our key insight is to bridge the tactile sim-to-real gap by unifying both domains through a shared deform map representation. Specifically, we compute 3D intersection volumes as depth maps in simulation, while in the real world, we employ an automated data-collection rig to learn a robust mapping from raw tactile images to ground-truth depth maps. By aligning simulation and real-world in this unified geometric space, Tacmap minimizes domain shift while maintaining physical consistency. Quantitative evaluations across diverse contact scenarios demonstrate that Tacmap's deform maps closely mirror real-world measurements. Moreover, we validate the utility of Tacmap through an in-hand rotation task, where a policy trained exclusively in simulation achieves zero-shot transfer to a physical robot.

Gradient-based optimizers are highly sensitive to design choices in their adaptive learning rate mechanisms. To address this limitation, we introduce POP, a meta-learned Reinforcement Learning (RL) policy that predicts adaptive learning rates for gradient descent, conditioned on the contextual information provided in the optimization trajectory. Our method introduces a novel RL reward formulation, a new function-scaling strategy for in-distribution generalization, and a novel prior that is used to sample millions of synthetic optimization problems. We evaluate POP on an established benchmark including 43 optimization functions of various complexity, where it significantly outperforms gradient-based methods. Our evaluation demonstrates strong generalization capabilities without task-specific tuning.

Magnetic-anomaly navigation, leveraging small-scale variations in the Earth's magnetic field, is a promising alternative when GPS is unavailable or compromised. Airborne systems face a key challenge in extracting geomagnetic field data: the aircraft itself induces magnetic noise. Although the classical Tolles-Lawson model addresses this, it inadequately handles stochastically corrupted magnetic data required for navigation. To handle stochastic noise, we propose using two physics-based constraints: divergence-free vector fields and E(3)-equivariance. These ensure the learned magnetic field obeys Maxwell's equation and that outputs transform correctly with sensor position and orientation. The divergence-free constraint is implemented by training a neural network to output a vector potential A, with the magnetic field defined as its curl. For E(3)-equivariance, we use tensor products of geometric tensors represented via spherical harmonics with known rotational transformations. Enforcing physical consistency and restricting the admissible function space acts as an implicit regularizer that improves spatiotemporal performance. We present ablation studies evaluating each constraint alone and jointly across CNNs, MLPs, LTCs, and Contiformers. Continuous-time dynamics and long-term memory are critical for modelling magnetic time series; the Contiformer, which provides both, outperforms existing methods. To mitigate data scarcity, we generate synthetic datasets using the World Magnetic Model (WMM) and time-series conditional GANs, producing realistic, temporally consistent magnetic sequences across varied trajectories and environments. Experiments show that embedding these constraints significantly improves predictive accuracy and physical plausibility, outperforming classical and unconstrained deep learning approaches. Acknowledgement: This work was done in collaboration with Dirac Labs.

Transformers excel at time series modelling through attention mechanisms that capture long-term temporal patterns. However, they assume uniform time intervals and therefore struggle with irregular time series. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) effectively handle irregular time series by modelling hidden states as continuously evolving trajectories. ContiFormers arxiv:2402.10635 combine NODEs with Transformers, but inherit the computational bottleneck of the former by using heavy numerical solvers. This bottleneck can be removed by using a closed-form solution for the given dynamical system - but this is known to be intractable in general! We obviate this by replacing NODEs with a novel linear damped harmonic oscillator analogy - which has a known closed-form solution. We model keys and values as damped, driven oscillators and expand the query in a sinusoidal basis up to a suitable number of modes. This analogy naturally captures the query-key coupling that is fundamental to any transformer architecture by modelling attention as a resonance phenomenon. Our closed-form solution eliminates the computational overhead of numerical ODE solvers while preserving expressivity. We prove that this oscillator-based parameterisation maintains the universal approximation property of continuous-time attention; specifically, any discrete attention matrix realisable by ContiFormer's continuous keys can be approximated arbitrarily well by our fixed oscillator modes. Our approach delivers both theoretical guarantees and scalability, achieving state-of-the-art performance on irregular time series benchmarks while being orders of magnitude faster. Acknowledgement: This work was done in collaboration with Dirac Labs.

Offline multi-objective optimization (MOO) aims to recover Pareto-optimal designs given a finite, static dataset. Recent generative approaches, including diffusion models, show strong performance under hypervolume, yet their behavior under other established MOO metrics is less understood. We show that generative methods systematically underperform evolutionary alternatives with respect to other metrics, such as generational distance. We relate this failure mode to the offline-frontier shift, i.e., the displacement of the offline dataset from the Pareto front, which acts as a fundamental limitation in offline MOO. We argue that overcoming this limitation requires out-of-distribution sampling in objective space (via an integral probability metric) and empirically observe that generative methods remain conservatively close to the offline objective distribution. Our results position offline MOO as a distribution-shift--limited problem and provide a diagnostic lens for understanding when and why generative optimization methods fail.

The scarcity of high-quality data remains a primary bottleneck in adapting multimodal generative models for medical image editing. Existing medical image editing datasets often suffer from limited diversity, neglect of medical image understanding and inability to balance quality with scalability. To address these gaps, we propose MieDB-100k, a large-scale, high-quality and diverse dataset for text-guided medical image editing. It categorizes editing tasks into perspectives of Perception, Modification and Transformation, considering both understanding and generation abilities. We construct MieDB-100k via a data curation pipeline leveraging both modality-specific expert models and rule-based data synthetic methods, followed by rigorous manual inspection to ensure clinical fidelity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that model trained with MieDB-100k consistently outperform both open-source and proprietary models while exhibiting strong generalization ability. We anticipate that this dataset will serve as a cornerstone for future advancements in specialized medical image editing.

Gradient-based methods can efficiently optimize controllers by leveraging differentiable simulation and physical priors. However, contact-rich manipulation remains challenging because hybrid contact dynamics often produce discontinuous or vanishing gradients. Although smoothing the dynamics can restore informative gradients, the resulting model mismatch can cause controller failures when deployed on real systems. We address this trade-off by planning with smoothed dynamics while explicitly quantifying and compensating for the induced error, providing formal guarantees on safety and task completion under the original nonsmooth dynamics. Our approach applies smoothing to both contact dynamics and contact geometry within a differentiable simulator based on convex optimization, allowing us to characterize the deviation from the nonsmooth dynamics as a set-valued discrepancy. We incorporate this discrepancy into the optimization of time-varying affine feedback policies through analytical reachable sets, enabling robust constraint satisfaction for the closed-loop hybrid system while relying solely on the informative gradients of the smoothed model. By bridging differentiable simulation with set-valued robust control, our method produces affine feedback policies that respect the unilateral nature of contact. We evaluate our method on several contact-rich tasks, including planar pushing, object rotation, and in-hand dexterous manipulation, achieving certified constraint satisfaction with lower safety violations and smaller goal errors than baseline approaches.

Large language models are commonly trained through multi-stage post-training: first via RLHF, then fine-tuned for other downstream objectives. Yet even small downstream updates can compromise earlier learned behaviors (e.g., safety), exposing a brittleness known as catastrophic forgetting. This suggests standard RLHF objectives do not guarantee robustness to future adaptation. To address it, most prior work designs downstream-time methods to preserve previously learned behaviors. We argue that preventing this requires pre-finetuning robustness: the base policy should avoid brittle high-reward solutions whose reward drops sharply under standard fine-tuning. We propose Fine-tuning Robust Policy Optimization (FRPO), a robust RLHF framework that optimizes reward not only at the current policy, but across a KL-bounded neighborhood of policies reachable by downstream adaptation. The key idea is to ensure reward stability under policy shifts via a max-min formulation. By modifying GRPO, we develop an algorithm with no extra computation, and empirically show it substantially reduces safety degradation across multiple base models and downstream fine-tuning regimes (SFT and RL) while preserving downstream task performance. We further study a math-focused RL setting, demonstrating that FRPO preserves accuracy under subsequent fine-tuning.

Floating-point neural networks dominate modern machine learning but incur substantial inference costs, motivating emerging interest in Boolean networks for resource-constrained deployments. Since Boolean networks use only Boolean operations, they can achieve nanosecond-scale inference latency. However, learning Boolean networks that are both compact and accurate remains challenging because of their discrete, combinatorial structure. In this work we address this challenge via three novel, complementary contributions: (i) a new parameter-free strategy for learning effective connections, (ii) a novel compact convolutional Boolean architecture that exploits spatial locality while requiring fewer Boolean operations than existing convolutional kernels, and (iii) an adaptive discretization procedure that reduces the accuracy drop incurred when converting a continuously relaxed network into a discrete Boolean network. Across standard vision benchmarks, our method improves the Pareto frontier over prior state-of-the-art methods, achieving higher accuracy with up to $47\times$ fewer Boolean operations. This advantage also extends to other modalities. Further, on an FPGA, our model on MNIST achieves 99.38\% accuracy with 6.48 ns latency, surpassing the prior state-of-the-art in both accuracy and runtime, while generating a $7\times$ smaller circuit. Code and models are available at https://github.com/eth-sri/CompactLogic.

Despite recent advancements in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on diverse understanding tasks, these models struggle to solve problems which require extensive multi-step reasoning. This is primarily due to the progressive dilution of visual information during long-context generation, which hinders their ability to fully exploit test-time scaling. To address this issue, we introduce Vision-aligned Latent Reasoning (VaLR), a simple, yet effective reasoning framework that dynamically generates vision-aligned latent tokens before each Chain of Thought reasoning step, guiding the model to reason based on perceptual cues in the latent space. Specifically, VaLR is trained to preserve visual knowledge during reasoning by aligning intermediate embeddings of MLLM with those from vision encoders. Empirical results demonstrate that VaLR consistently outperforms existing approaches across a wide range of benchmarks requiring long-context understanding or precise visual perception, while exhibiting test-time scaling behavior not observed in prior MLLMs. In particular, VaLR improves the performance significantly from 33.0% to 52.9% on VSI-Bench, achieving a 19.9%p gain over Qwen2.5-VL.

Inferring spatial transcriptomics (ST) from histology enables scalable histogenomic profiling, yet current methods are largely restricted to single-tissue models. This fragmentation fails to leverage biological principles shared across cancer types and hinders application to data-scarce scenarios. While pan-cancer training offers a solution, the resulting heterogeneity challenges monolithic architectures. To bridge this gap, we introduce MoLF (Mixture-of-Latent-Flow), a generative model for pan-cancer histogenomic prediction. MoLF leverages a conditional Flow Matching objective to map noise to the gene latent manifold, parameterized by a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) velocity field. By dynamically routing inputs to specialized sub-networks, this architecture effectively decouples the optimization of diverse tissue patterns. Our experiments demonstrate that MoLF establishes a new state-of-the-art, consistently outperforming both specialized and foundation model baselines on pan-cancer benchmarks. Furthermore, MoLF exhibits zero-shot generalization to cross-species data, suggesting it captures fundamental, conserved histo-molecular mechanisms.

Deep learning has achieved strong performance in Time Series Forecasting (TSF). However, we identify a critical representation paradox, termed Latent Chaos: models with accurate predictions often learn latent representations that are temporally disordered and lack continuity. We attribute this to the dominant observation-space forecasting paradigm, where minimizing point-wise errors on noisy and partially observed data encourages shortcut solutions instead of the recovery of underlying system dynamics. To address this, we propose Latent Time Series Forecasting (LatentTSF), a paradigm that shifts TSF from observation regression to latent state prediction. LatentTSF employs an AutoEncoder to project each observation into a learned latent state space and performs forecasting entirely in this space, allowing the model to focus on learning structured temporal dynamics. We provide an information-theoretic analysis showing that the latent objectives can be motivated as surrogates for maximizing mutual information between predicted and ground-truth latent states and future observations. Extensive experiments on widely-used benchmarks confirm that LatentTSF effectively mitigates latent chaos, yielding consistent improvements in both forecasting accuracy and representation quality. Our code is available at https://github.com/Muyiiiii/LatentTSF.

Conventional audio equalization is a static process that requires manual and cumbersome adjustments to adapt to changing listening contexts (e.g., mood, location, or social setting). In this paper, we introduce a Large Language Model (LLM)-based alternative that maps natural language text prompts to equalization settings. This enables a conversational approach to sound system control. By utilizing data collected from a controlled listening experiment, our models exploit in-context learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques to reliably align with population-preferred equalization settings. Our evaluation methods, which leverage distributional metrics that capture users' varied preferences, show statistically significant improvements in distributional alignment over random sampling and static preset baselines. These results indicate that LLMs could function as "artificial equalizers," contributing to the development of more accessible, context-aware, and expert-level audio tuning methods.

Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted as central reasoning modules for embodied agents. Existing benchmarks evaluate their capabilities under ideal, well-lit conditions, yet robust 24/7 operation demands performance under a wide range of visual degradations, including low-light conditions at night or in dark environments, a core necessity that has been largely overlooked. To address this underexplored challenge, we present DarkQA, an open-source benchmark for evaluating perceptual primitives under multi-level low-light conditions in embodied scenarios. DarkQA evaluates single-view egocentric observations across controlled degradation levels, isolating low-light perceptual failures before they are entangled with complex embodied tasks. The benchmark contains 9.4K deterministically generated and verifiable question-image pairs spanning five visual-primitive families. A key design feature of DarkQA is its physical fidelity: visual degradations are modeled in linear RAW space, simulating physics-based illumination drop and sensor noise followed by an ISP-inspired rendering pipeline; we further validate the synthesis against real paired low-light camera data. We evaluate representative VLMs and Low-Light Image Enhancement (LLIE) preprocessing methods. Results show consistent VLM degradation under low illumination and sensor noise, while LLIE provides severity-dependent but unstable recovery. We demonstrate the utility of DarkQA by evaluating a wide range of state-of-the-art VLMs and Low-Light Image Enhancement (LLIE) models, and systematically reveal VLMs' limitations when operating under these challenging visual conditions. Our code and benchmark dataset will be released upon acceptance. Project website: https://darkqa-benchmark.github.io

The increasing use of machine learning in safety-critical domains amplifies the risk of adversarial threats, especially data poisoning attacks that corrupt training data to degrade performance or induce unsafe behavior. Most existing defenses lack formal guarantees or rely on restrictive assumptions about the model class, attack type, extent of poisoning, or point-wise certification, limiting their practical reliability. This paper introduces a principled formal robustness certification framework that models gradient-based training as a discrete-time dynamical system (dt-DS) and formulates poisoning robustness as a formal safety verification problem. By adapting the concept of barrier certificates (BCs) from control theory, we introduce sufficient conditions to certify a robust radius ensuring that the terminal model remains safe under worst-case ${\ell}_p$-norm based poisoning. To make this practical, we parameterize BCs as neural networks trained on finite sets of poisoned trajectories. We further derive probably approximately correct (PAC) bounds by solving a scenario convex program (SCP), which yields a confidence lower bound on the certified robustness radius generalizing beyond the training set. Importantly, our framework also extends to certification against test-time attacks, making it the first unified framework to provide formal guarantees in both training and test-time attack settings. Experiments on MNIST, SVHN, and CIFAR-10 show that our approach certifies non-trivial perturbation budgets while being model-agnostic and requiring no prior knowledge of the attack or contamination level.

Reward specification plays a central role in reinforcement learning (RL), guiding the agent's behavior. To express non-Markovian rewards, formalisms such as reward machines have been introduced to capture dependencies on histories. However, traditional reward machines lack the ability to model precise timing constraints, limiting their use in time-sensitive applications. In this paper, we propose timed reward machines (TRMs), which are an extension of reward machines that incorporate timing constraints into the reward structure. TRMs enable more expressive specifications with tunable reward logic, for example, imposing costs for delays and granting rewards for timely actions. We study model-free RL frameworks (i.e., tabular Q-learning) for learning optimal policies with TRMs under digital and real-time semantics. Our algorithms integrate the TRM into learning via abstractions of timed automata, and employ counterfactual-imagining heuristics that exploit the structure of the TRM to improve the search. Experimentally, we demonstrate that our algorithm learns policies that achieve high rewards while satisfying the timing constraints specified by the TRM on popular RL benchmarks. Moreover, we conduct comparative studies of performance under different TRM semantics, along with ablations that highlight the benefits of counterfactual-imagining.

Balancing competing objectives is omnipresent across disciplines, from drug design to autonomous systems. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization is a promising solution for such expensive, black-box problems: it fits probabilistic surrogates and selects new designs via an acquisition function that balances exploration and exploitation. In practice, it requires tailored choices of surrogate and acquisition that rarely transfer to the next problem, is myopic when multi-step planning is often required, and adds refitting overhead, particularly in parallel or time-sensitive loops. We present TAMO, a fully amortized, universal policy for multi-objective black-box optimization. TAMO uses a transformer architecture that operates across varying input and objective dimensions, enabling pretraining on diverse corpora and transfer to new problems without retraining: at test time, the pretrained model proposes the next design with a single forward pass. We pretrain the policy with reinforcement learning to maximize cumulative hypervolume improvement over full trajectories, conditioning on the entire query history to approximate the Pareto frontier. Across synthetic benchmarks and real tasks, TAMO produces fast proposals, reducing proposal time by 50-1000x versus alternatives while matching or improving Pareto quality under tight evaluation budgets. These results show that transformers can perform multi-objective optimization entirely in-context, eliminating per-task surrogate fitting and acquisition engineering, and open a path to foundation-style, plug-and-play optimizers for scientific discovery workflows.

Deep generative models are powerful priors for imaging inverse problems, but training-free solvers for latent flow models face a practical finite-step trade-off. Optimization-heavy methods quickly improve measurement consistency, but in highly nonlinear latent spaces, their results can depend strongly on where local refinement is initialized, often degrading perceptual realism. In contrast, stochastic sampling methods better preserve posterior exploration, but often require many iterations to obtain sharp, measurement-consistent reconstructions. To address this trade-off, we propose FlowLPS, a training-free latent flow inverse solver based on Langevin-Proximal Sampling. At each reverse step, FlowLPS uses a few Langevin updates to perturb the model-predicted clean estimate in posterior-oriented directions, providing stochastic initializations for local refinement. It then applies local MAP-style proximal refinement to rapidly improve measurement consistency from the Langevin-updated estimate. We additionally use controlled pCN-style re-noising to stabilize the reverse trajectory while retaining trajectory coherence. Experiments on FFHQ and DIV2K across five linear inverse problems show that FlowLPS achieves a strong balance between measurement fidelity and perceptual quality, with additional experiments on pixel-space inverse problems and phase retrieval.

Text-to-image flow matching transformers degrade sharply in long-tail settings: tail-class outputs collapse in fidelity and diversity, limiting their value as synthetic augmentation for rare conditions. We trace this to low head-versus-tail gradient alignment during fine-tuning, an optimization-level pathology that conditioning- and sampling-side interventions do not address. We propose GRASP (Guided Residual Adapters with Sample-wise Partitioning): a deterministic partition of the conditioning space, paired with group-specific residual adapters in the transformer feedforward layers, that leaves the flow-matching objective and the sampler untouched. In conditional flow matching, condition values index distinct sets of probability paths, so partitioning along the conditioning is the structurally correct factorization suitable as gradient alignment proxy. Because the partition is static, every tail sample is guaranteed to update its assigned expert, which bypasses extreme longtail failure modes. Crucially, GRASP is non-invasive and composable: on MIMIC-CXR-LT, combining GRASP with self-guided minority sampling at inference time yields the best all-labels IRS we observe, beyond either intervention alone. GRASP itself reduces overall FID by up to 80\% and lifts tail-class coverage by up to 44\% over full fine-tuning, learned-routing MoE, and minority guidance. Used as training data for a downstream DenseNet classifier on NIH-CXR-LT, GRASP synthetics significantly outperform every non-GRASP alternative on macro F1, match the macro F1 obtained from real training data, and yield nonzero F1 on $9$ of $13$ classes versus $3$ of $13$ from full fine-tuning. Results on ImageNet-LT confirm the mechanism is not tied to medical inductive bias.

Unified multimodal models for image generation and understanding represent a significant step toward AGI and have attracted widespread attention from researchers. The main challenge of this task lies in the difficulty in establishing an optimal training paradigm due to inherent conflicting targets in understanding and generation tasks. To alleviate these conflicts and pursue higher performance, many researchers adopt varying degrees of architecture decoupling (e.g., Double image encoders, MOE/MOT architecture, or frozen MLLM). However, excessive model decoupling can lead to the loss of interleave generation ability, undermining the original intent of unified models. In this work, we aim to explore how to mitigate task conflicts without resorting to model decoupling. Firstly, we analyze why decoupling boosts performance by studying the cross-modal attention behavior of models. We observe that architecture decoupling does not solve task conflicts, but essentially drives models toward cross-modal interaction patterns of task-specific models, as seen in Qwen3-VL and HunyuanImage-3.0, and that the more thorough the decoupling, the more consistent the behavior becomes. Motivated by this observation, we propose Attention Interaction Alignment (AIA) loss, which explicitly learns task-specific multimodal interaction patterns during training. To demonstrate the generalizability of our AIA loss, we apply it to Emu3 and Janus-Pro during SFT and post-training stage respectively. Without bells and whistles, AIA not only refines cross-modal attention patterns, but also boosts both generation and understanding performance.

Deep unfolding networks (DUNs) combine the interpretability of model-based methods with the learning ability of deep networks, yet remain limited for blind image restoration (BIR). Existing DUNs suffer from: (1) \textbf{Degradation-specific dependency}, as their optimization frameworks are tied to a known degradation model, making them unsuitable for BIR tasks; and (2) \textbf{Over-smoothing bias}, resulting from the direct feeding of gradient descent outputs, dominated by low-frequency content, into the proximal term, suppressing fine textures. To overcome these issues, we propose UnfoldLDM to integrate DUNs with latent diffusion model (LDM) for BIR. In each stage, UnfoldLDM employs a multi-granularity degradation-aware (MGDA) module as the gradient descent step. MGDA models BIR as an unknown degradation estimation problem and estimates both the holistic degradation matrix and its decomposed forms, enabling robust degradation removal. For the proximal step, we design a degradation-resistant LDM (DR-LDM) to extract compact degradation-invariant priors from the MGDA output. Guided by this prior, an over-smoothing correction transformer (OCFormer) explicitly recovers high-frequency components and enhances texture details. This unique combination ensures the final result is degradation-free and visually rich. Experiments show that our UnfoldLDM achieves a leading place on various BIR tasks and benefits downstream tasks. Moreover, our design is compatible with existing DUN-based methods, serving as a plug-and-play framework. Code will be released.

While recent research suggests Large Language Models match human creative performance in divergent thinking tasks, visual creativity remains underexplored. This study compared image generation in human participants (Visual Artists and Non Artists) and using an image generation AI model (two prompting conditions with varying human input: high for Human Inspired, low for Self Guided). Human raters (N=255) and GPT4o evaluated the creativity of the resulting images. We found a clear creativity gradient, with Visual Artists being the most creative, followed by Non Artists, then Human Inspired generative AI, and finally Self Guided generative AI. Increased human guidance strongly improved GenAI's creative output, bringing its productions close to those of Non Artists. Notably, human and AI raters also showed vastly different creativity judgment patterns. These results suggest that, in contrast to language centered tasks, GenAI models may face unique challenges in visual domains, where creativity depends on perceptual nuance and contextual sensitivity, distinctly human capacities that may not be readily transferable from language models.

Deep-learning survival models for electronic health record (EHR) data are hard to compare across papers because the upstream preprocessing step, which includes cohort definition, time discretisation, missingness handling, and censoring rules, is typically undocumented and inconsistent. A reported difference in concordance between two mortality models can therefore reflect any of these choices rather than a modelling contribution. We present SurvBench, an open-source preprocessing pipeline that converts raw PhysioNet exports into model-ready tensors for survival analysis. SurvBench covers four critical-care databases (MIMIC-IV, eICU, MC-MED, HiRID) and four input modalities: time-series vitals and laboratory values, static demographics, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, and radiology report embeddings. Every preprocessing decision is controlled through YAML configuration. Imputation, scaling, and feature filtering are fit on the training fold only. Missingness is recorded as a binary mask alongside each feature tensor. The pipeline handles single-risk endpoints (in-hospital and in-ICU mortality) and competing-risks endpoints (a three-way emergency-department admission pathway, with home discharge treated as administrative censoring). We also provide support for harmonised cross-dataset external validation between eICU and MIMIC-IV. SurvBench is publicly available at https://github.com/munibmesinovic/SurvBench, providing a robust platform that future deep-learning EHR survival work, especially nascent multi-modal approaches, can be measured against under matched preprocessing.

This data paper introduces MajinBook, an open catalogue designed to facilitate the use of shadow libraries-such as Library Genesis and Z-Library-for computational social science and cultural analytics. By linking metadata from these vast, crowd-sourced archives with structured bibliographic data from Goodreads, we create a high-precision corpus of over 539,000 references to digitally mediated English-language books. Spanning three centuries and reflecting a contemporary selection bias, these entries are enriched with first publication dates, genres, and popularity metrics like ratings and reviews. Our methodology prioritises natively digital EPUB files to ensure machine-readable quality, while addressing biases in traditional corpora like HathiTrust, and includes secondary datasets for French, German, and Spanish. We evaluate the linkage strategy for accuracy, release all underlying data openly, and discuss the project's legal permissibility under EU and US frameworks for text and data mining in research.

Code-switching (CS) speech translation (ST) aims to translate speech that alternates between multiple languages into a target language text, posing significant challenges due to the complexity of semantic modeling and the scarcity of CS data. Previous studies mainly rely on the models themselves to implicitly learn semantic representations and resort to costly manual annotations. To mitigate these limitations, we propose enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) speech projector composed of language expert groups, where each group specializes in the semantic space of a specific language for fine-grained speech feature modeling. A language-specific loss and an intra-group load balancing loss are jointly introduced to guide efficient token routing across and within expert groups. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-stage training paradigm that utilizes readily available automatic speech recognition (ASR) and monolingual ST data, facilitating speech-text alignment and improving translation performance. To bridge the data gap for smooth domain transfer, a transition loss is employed to improve adaptation to CS scenarios. Extensive experiments on widely used datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our approach, achieving average improvements of $0.86$ BLEU and $0.93$ COMET over SeamlessM4T, with maximum improvements of $1.49$ BLEU and $1.41$ COMET across different test sets.

Schedule-Free SGD, proposed in [Defazio et al., 2024], achieves optimal convergence rates without requiring the training horizon in advance, by replacing learning rate schedules with a principled form of iterate averaging. However, the method still requires tuning a base learning rate whose optimal value depends on unknown problem constants. In this work, we continue down this road by deriving Polyak-type step sizes for Schedule-Free SGD and Adam that compute the learning rate at each iteration from the sampled loss, gradient, and current iterates alone. We first propose an oracle variant that uses per-sample optimal function values and prove an $O(1/\sqrt{t})$ anytime last-iterate rate for convex Lipschitz objectives. We then remove the oracle requirement with a safeguarded variant that replaces the unknown optimal values with any available lower bound, achieving the same rate up to a neighborhood that vanishes under interpolation. Both step sizes reduce to existing Polyak rules for standard SGD when momentum is set to zero, unifying standard and schedule-free Polyak methods. Numerical experiments on language modeling, including pretraining and distillation, show that the proposed methods match or surpass tuned Schedule-Free baselines while offering greater robustness to hyperparameter choices.

We present Contamination Detection via Context (CoDeC), a practical and accurate method to detect and quantify training data contamination in large language models. CoDeC distinguishes between data memorized during training and data outside the training distribution by measuring how in-context learning affects model performance. We find that in-context examples typically boost confidence for unseen datasets but may reduce it when the dataset was part of training, due to disrupted memorization patterns. Experiments show that CoDeC produces interpretable contamination scores that clearly separate seen and unseen datasets, and reveals strong evidence of memorization in open-weight models with undisclosed training corpora. The method is simple, automated, and both model- and dataset-agnostic, making it easy to integrate with benchmark evaluations.