Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects more than 75 million people worldwide. However, scalable support for practicing everyday conversation is scarce: Low-cost activities such as story reading yield limited improvement. At the same time, effective role-play therapy demands expensive, in-person sessions with specialists. SocialWise bridges this gap through a browser-based application that pairs LLM conversational agents with a therapeutic retrieval augmented generation (RAG) knowledge base. Users select a scenario (e.g., ordering food, joining a group), interact by text or voice, and receive instant, structured feedback on tone, engagement, and alternative phrasing. The SocialWise prototype, implemented with Streamlit, LangChain, and ChromaDB, runs on any computer with internet access, and demonstrates how recent advances in LLM can provide evidence-based, on-demand communication coaching for individuals with ASD.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into design and development workflows, yet decisions about their use are rarely binary or purely technical. We report findings from a constructivist grounded theory study based on interviews with 33 designers and developers across three large technology organisations. Rather than evaluating LLMs solely by capability, participants reasoned about the role an LLM could occupy within a workflow and how that role would interact with existing structures of responsibility and organisational accountability. When LLMs were framed as tools under clear human control, their use was typically acceptable and could be integrated within existing governance structures. When framed as teammates with shared or ambiguous agency, practitioners expressed hesitation, particularly when responsibility for outcomes could not be clearly justified. At the same time, participants also described productive teammate configurations in which LLMs supported collaborative reasoning while remaining embedded within explicit oversight structures. We identify tool and teammate framings as recurring ways in which designers and developers position LLMs relative to human work and present an analytic rubric describing how role framing shapes decision authority, accountability ownership, oversight strategies, and organisational acceptability. By foregrounding design-time reasoning, this work reframes To LLM or Not to LLM as a sociotechnical positioning problem that emerges during system design rather than during post-deployment evaluation.

Mixed Reality (MR) offers immersive and multimodal opportunities for education but remains difficult for teachers to author without technical expertise. We propose MRGEN, a conceptual framework for LLM-powered authoring tools to support teachers in creating MR learning activities that work on mobile devices (tablets and smartphones). MRGEN articulates three axes: Learning Objectives, MR Modality, and GAI Assistance. To validate our framework, we implemented a prototype based on the open-source MIXAP authoring platform and conducted a user study with 24 participants. Results show that LLM-powered authoring reduced task duration by 36% on average, and that over 90% of participants found the AI support helpful for brainstorming, structuring, and aligning content with their learning goals. These findings yielded very promising results for future AI-assisted MR authoring tools.

Uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity are closely related and often confused concepts in human-robot interaction (HRI). In earlier studies, these concepts have been defined in contradictory ways and described using inconsistent terminology. This conceptual confusion and lack of terminological consistency undermine empirical comparability, thereby slowing the accumulation of theory. Consequently, consistent concepts that clarify these challenges, including their definitions, distinctions, and interrelationships, are needed in HRI. To address this lack of clarity, this paper proposes a consistent conceptual foundation for the challenges of uncertainty, vagueness, and ambiguity in HRI. First, we examine the meanings of these three terms in dictionaries. We then analyze the nature of their distinctions and interrelationships within the context of HRI. We further illustrate these characteristics through examples. Finally, we demonstrate how this consistent conceptual foundation facilitates the design of novel methods and the evaluation of existing methodologies for these phenomena.

Large language models (LLMs) enable increasingly capable tutoring-style conversational agents, yet effective tutoring requires sensitivity to learners' affective and cognitive states beyond text alone. Facial expressions provide immediate and practical cues of confusion, frustration, or engagement, but remain underexplored in LLM-driven tutoring. We investigate whether facial-expression-aware signals can improve empathetic tutoring responses through prompt-level integration, without end-to-end retraining. We build a scalable simulated tutoring environment where a student agent exhibits diverse facial behaviors from a large unlabeled facial expression video dataset, and compare four tutor variants: a text-only LLM baseline, a multimodal baseline using a random facial frame, and two Action Unit estimation model (AUM)-based methods that either inject textual AU descriptions or select a peak-expression frame for visual grounding. Across 960 multi-turn conversations spanning three tutor backbones (GPT-5.1, Claude Ops 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Pro), we evaluate targeted pairwise comparisons with five human raters and an exhaustive AI evaluator. AU-based conditioning consistently improves empathetic responsiveness to facial expressions across all tutor backbones, while AUM-guided peak-frame selection outperforms random-frame visual input. Textual AU abstraction and peak-frame visual injection show model-dependent advantages. Control analyses show that this improvement does not come at the expense of worse pedagogical clarity or responsiveness to textual cues. Finally, AI-human agreement is highest on facial-expression-grounded empathy, supporting scalable AI evaluation for this dimension. Overall, our results show that lightweight, structured facial expression representations can meaningfully enhance empathy in LLM-based tutoring systems with minimal overhead.

The growing adoption of interactive learning tools in higher education offers new opportunities to enhance student performance and well-being. This study compares the effects of traditional and interactive learning methods on academic performance, engagement, motivation, and emotional well-being among 100 university students enrolled in a computer intrusion detection course. Participants were randomly assigned to either a traditional learning group (lectures and notes) or an interactive learning group utilising tools such as Kahoot, Panopto, Slido, Quizizz, Padlet, and educational videos. Academic achievement was measured through pre-tests, post-tests, final exams, and assignments, while engagement and emotional states were assessed using validated Likert-scale questionnaires. Results showed that students in the interactive group significantly outperformed their peers in both post-tests (67.48% vs. 53.36%) and final exams (80.8% vs. 61.44%). Interactive learners also demonstrated greater behavioural (+67.01%) and emotional engagement (+75.32%), along with enhanced emotional well-being marked by increased positive emotions (+66.67%) and reduced frustration. A significant drop in cognitive involvement (-39.8%) indicates possible cognitive overload. The pedagogical potential of interactive learning is reaffirmed by this result while reinforcing the need for balancing stimulation and cognitive level. Future research with larger, diverse samples is suggested for generalising and maximising outcomes.

The exponential growth of AI education has brought millions of learners to online platforms, yet this massive scale has simultaneously exposed critical pedagogical shortcomings. Traditional video-based instruction, while cost-effective and scalable, demonstrates systematic failures in both sustaining learner engagement and facilitating the deep conceptual mastery essential for AI literacy. We present a pilot study evaluating a novel hybrid learning platform that integrates real-time conversational AI tutors with traditional video lectures. Our controlled experiment (N = 58, mean age M = 21.4, SD = 2.8) compared traditional video-based instruction with our AI-augmented video platform. This study employed a sequential within-subjects design where all participants first completed the traditional video condition followed by the AI-augmented condition, providing direct comparisons of learning outcomes. We measured learning effectiveness through immediate post-tests and delayed retention assessments (2-week delay). Results suggest improvements in learning performance: immediate post-test performance showed a large effect size (d = 1.505) with participants scoring 8.3 points higher after AI-augmented instruction (91.8 vs 83.5 out of 100, p < .001). Behavioral analytics revealed increased engagement duration (71.1% improvement with AI tutoring) in the experimental group. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that conversational AI tutors may enhance traditional educational delivery, suggesting a potential avenue for developing scalable, adaptive learning systems.

Crash diagrams are essential tools in transportation safety analysis, yet their manual preparation remains time-consuming and prone to human variability. This study investigates the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to automate crash diagram generation from police crash reports, focusing on multilane roundabouts as a challenging test case. A three-part structured prompt framework was developed to guide model reasoning through interpretation, extraction, and visual synthesis, while a 10-metric evaluation system was designed to assess diagram quality in terms of semantic accuracy, spatial fidelity, and visual clarity. Three popular models, including GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Flash, and Janus-4o, were tested on 79 crash reports. GPT-4o achieved the highest average performance (6.29 out of 10), followed by Gemini-1.5-Flash (5.28) and Janus-4o (3.64). The analysis revealed GPT-4o's superior spatial reasoning and alignment between extracted and visualized crash data. These results highlight both the promise and current limitations of VLMs in engineering visualization tasks. The study lays the groundwork for integrating generative AI into crash analysis workflows to improve efficiency, consistency, and interpretability.

We analyze over 500,000 de-identified health-related conversations with Microsoft Copilot from January 2026 to characterize what people ask conversational AI about health. We develop a hierarchical intent taxonomy of 12 primary categories using privacy-preserving LLM-based classification validated against expert human annotation, and apply LLM-driven topic-clustering for prevalent themes within each intent. Using this taxonomy, we characterize the intents and topics behind health queries, identify who these queries are about, and analyze how usage varies by device and time of day. Five findings stand out. First, nearly one in five conversations involve personal symptom assessment or condition discussion, and even the dominant general information category (40%) is concentrated on specific treatments and conditions, suggesting that this is a lower bound on personal health intent. Second, one in seven of these personal health queries concern someone other than the user, such as a child, a parent, a partner, suggesting that conversational AI can be a caregiving tool, not just a personal one. Third, personal queries about symptoms and emotional health queries increase markedly in the evening and nighttime hours, when traditional healthcare is most limited. Fourth, usage diverges sharply by device: mobile concentrates on personal health concerns, while desktop is dominated by professional and academic work. Fifth, a substantial share of queries focuses on navigating healthcare systems such as finding providers, and understanding insurance, highlighting friction in the delivery of existing healthcare. These patterns have direct implications for platform-specific design, safety considerations, and the responsible development of health AI.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human responses in behavioral research, yet it remains unclear when LLM-generated data support the same experimental inferences as human data. We evaluate this by directly comparing off-the-shelf LLM-generated responses with human responses from a canonical survey experiment on accuracy perception. Each human observation is converted into a structured prompt, and models generate a single 0--10 outcome variable without task-specific training; identical statistical analyses are applied to human and synthetic responses. We find that LLMs reproduce several directional effects observed in humans, but effect magnitudes and moderation patterns vary across models. Off-the-shelf LLMs therefore capture aggregate belief-updating patterns under controlled conditions but do not consistently match human-scale effects, clarifying when LLM-generated data can function as behavioral surrogates.

Universities are microcosms of urban ecosystems, with concentrated consumption patterns in food, transport, energy, and product usage. These environments not only contribute substantially to sustainability pressures but also provide a unique opportunity to advance sustainability education and behavioural change at scale. As in most sectors, digital sustainability initiatives within universities remain narrowly focused on carbon calculations, typically providing static feedback that limits opportunities for sustained behavioural change. To address this gap, we propose Eco-Bee, integrating large language models, a translation of the Planetary Boundaries framework (as Eco-Score), and a conversational agent that connects individual choices to environmental limits. Tailored for students at the cusp of lifelong habits, Eco-Bee delivers actionable insights, peer benchmarking, and gamified challenges to sustain engagement and drive measurable progress toward boundary-aligned living. In a pilot tested across multiple campus networks (n=52), 96% of the student participants supported a campus-wide rollout and reported a clearer understanding of how daily behaviours collectively impact the planet's limits. By embedding planetary science, behavioural reinforcement, and AI-driven personalisation into a single platform, Eco-Bee establishes a scalable foundation for climate-conscious universities and future AI-mediated sustainability infrastructures.

This paper presents the design of NEFFY 2.0, a social robot designed as a haptic slow-paced breathing companion for stress reduction, and reports findings from a mixed-methods user study with 14 refugees from Ukraine. Developed through a user-centered design process, NEFFY 2.0 builds on NEFFY 1.0 and integrates embodiment and multi-sensory interaction to provide low-threshold, accessible guidance of slow-paced breathing for stress relief, which may be particularly valuable for individuals experiencing prolonged periods of anxiety. To evaluate effectiveness, an experimental comparison of a robot-assisted breathing intervention versus an audio-only condition was conducted. Measures included subjective ratings and physiological indicators, such as heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) using RMSSD parameter, respiratory rate (RR), and galvanic skin response (GSR), alongside qualitative data from interviews exploring user experience and perceived support. Qualitative findings showed that NEFFY 2.0 was perceived as intuitive, calming and supportive. Survey results showed a substantially larger effect in significant reduction of perceived stress in the NEFFY 2.0 condition compared to audio-only. Physiological data reveled mixed results combined with large inter-personal variability. Three patterns of breathing practice with NEFFY 2.0 were identified using k-means clustering. Despite the small sample size, this study makes a novel contribution by providing empirical evidence of stress reduction in a vulnerable population through a direct comparison of robot-assisted and non-robot conditions. The findings position NEFFY 2.0 as a promising low-threshold tool that supports stress relief and contributes to the vision of HRI empowering society.

As AI enters creative practice, audiences face growing uncertainty in judging authenticity and value. This study examines the Struggle Premium, the added value attributed to perceived human effort, by analyzing how visible effort cues influence evaluations of human- and AI-generated creative works. We surveyed 70 university students, focusing on process videos, time documentation, written explanations, and imperfections. Process-oriented cues, especially videos and time spent, most strongly shaped authenticity and value judgments, while imperfections had limited impact. Participants showed a clear preference for human-made works, with 72.9% willing to pay more. Notably, effort cues also improved perceptions of AI-generated content, suggesting that process transparency can partially bridge authenticity gaps. These findings extend the effort heuristic to algorithmic creativity and inform the design of transparent human-AI creative systems.

Individuals often align their speaking patterns with their interlocutors, a phenomenon linked to engagement and rapport. While well documented in task-oriented dialogues, less is known about entrainment in naturalistic, non-task and virtual settings. In this study, we analyze a large corpus of spontaneous dyadic Zoom conversations to examine how conversational dynamics relate to perceived interaction quality. We extract multimodal features encompassing turn-taking, pauses, facial movements, and acoustic measures such as pitch and intensity. Perceived conversational success was quantified via factor analysis of post-conversation ratings. Results demonstrate that entrainment reliably detected in spontaneous speech and correlates with higher perceived success. These findings identify key interactional markers of conversational quality and highlight opportunities for targeted interventions to foster more effective and engaging communication.

With large language models (LLMs) becoming increasingly prevalent in daily life, so too has the tendency to attribute to them human-like minds and emotions, or anthropomorphize them. Here, we investigate dimensions people use to anthropomorphize and attribute trust toward LLMs across more than 2,000 human-LLM interactions. Participants (N=115) engaged with LLM chatbots systematically varied in warmth (friendliness), competence (capability, coherence), and empathy (cognitive and affective). Warmth and cognitive empathy significantly predicted perceptions on all outcomes (perceived anthropomorphism, trust, similarity, relational closeness, frustration, usefulness), while competence predicted all outcomes except for anthropomorphism. Affective empathy primarily predicted perceived relational measures, but did not predict the epistemic outcomes. Topic sub-analyses showed that more subjective, personally relevant topics (e.g., relationship advice) amplified these effects, producing greater human-likeness and relational connection with the LLM than did objective topics. Together, these findings reveal that warmth, competence, and empathy are key dimensions through which people attribute relational and epistemic perceptions to artificial agents.

This research aimed to develop an intelligent system to evaluate performance and extract behavioral models for children with ASD and neurotypical (TD) children by interacting with a virtual social robot in a music education program using deep neural networks. The system has two main features: 1) it distinguishes between neurotypical children and those with ASD based on their behavior, and 2) generates behaviors resembling those of neurotypical or ASD children in similar situations using deep learning. Intelligent systems that identify complex patterns and simulate behavior can aid in diagnosis, therapist training, and understanding the disorder. Using data from a previous study at the Social and Cognitive Robotics Laboratory of Sharif University of Technology (including the usable data of 9 ASD and 21 TD participants), the system achieved an accuracy of 81% and sensitivity of 96% in distinguishing neurotypical children from those with ASD using both impact data and motion signals. A transformer-based network was designed to reproduce children's behaviors. Experts in the field struggled to differentiate real behaviors from reproduced ones, with an accuracy of 53.5% and agreement of 68%, indicating the model's success in simulating realistic behaviors.

Quantum kernel methods are among the leading candidates for achieving quantum advantage in supervised learning. A key bottleneck is the cost of inference: evaluating a trained model on new data requires estimating a weighted sum $\sum_{i=1}^N α_i k(x,x_i)$ of $N$ kernel values to additive precision $\varepsilon$, where $α$ is the vector of trained coefficients. The standard approach estimates each term independently via sampling, yielding a query complexity of $O(N\lVertα\rVert_2^2/\varepsilon^2)$. In this work, we identify two independent axes for improvement: (1) How individual kernel values are estimated (sampling versus quantum amplitude estimation), and (2) how the sum is approximated (term-by-term versus via a single observable), and systematically analyze all combinations thereof. The query-optimal combination, encoding the full inference sum as the expectation value of a single observable and applying quantum amplitude estimation, achieves a query complexity of $O(\lVertα\rVert_1/\varepsilon)$, removing the dependence on $N$ from the query count and yielding a quadratic improvement in both $\lVertα\rVert_1$ and $\varepsilon$. We prove a matching lower bound of $Ω(\lVertα\rVert_1/\varepsilon)$, establishing query-optimality of our approach up to logarithmic factors. Beyond query complexity, we also analyze how these improvements translate into gate costs and show that the query-optimal strategy is not always optimal in practice from the perspective of gate complexity. Our results provide both a query-optimal algorithm and a practically optimal choice of strategy depending on hardware capabilities, along with a complete landscape of intermediate methods to guide practitioners. All algorithms require only amplitude estimation as a subroutine and are thus natural candidates for early-fault-tolerant implementations.

Neuromotor decoding from upper-limb electromyography (sEMG) can enhance human-machine interfaces and offer a more natural means of controlling prosthetic limbs, virtual reality, and household electronics. Unfortunately, current sEMG technology does not always perform consistently across users because individual differences such as age and body mass index, among many others, can substantially alter signal quality. This variability makes sEMG characteristics highly idiosyncratic, often necessitating laborious personalization and iterative tuning to achieve reliable performance. This variability has particular import for sEMG-based assistive devices and neural interfaces, where demographic biases in sEMG features could undermine broad and fair deployment. In this study, we explore how demographic differences affect the sEMG signals produced and their implications for machine learning-based gesture decoding. We analyze the data set provided by, in which we derive 147 common sEMG features extracted from 81 demographically diverse individuals performing discrete hand gestures. Using mixed-effects linear models and partial least squares (PLS) analysis, which take into consideration demographic variables (including age, sex, height, weight, skin properties, subcutaneous fat, and hair density), we identify that 33\% (49 of 147) of commonly used sEMG features show significant associations with demographic characteristics. These results may help guide the development of fair and unbiased sEMG-based neural interfaces across a diverse population.

Gradient saliency from deep sequence models surfaces candidate biomarkers efficiently, but the resulting gene lists can be contaminated by tissue-composition confounders that degrade downstream classifiers. We study whether LLM chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning can filter these confounders, and whether reasoning quality is associated with downstream performance. We train a Mamba SSM on TCGA-BRCA RNA-seq and extract the top-50 genes by gradient saliency; DeepSeek-R1 evaluates every candidate with structured CoT to produce a final 17-gene set. On the held-out test split, the raw 50-gene saliency set (no LLM) performs worse than a 5,000-gene variance baseline (AUC 0.832 vs. 0.903), while the LLM-filtered set surpasses it (AUC 0.927), using 294x fewer features. A faithfulness audit (COSMIC CGC, OncoKB, PAM50) shows that 6 of 17 selected genes (35.3%) are validated BRCA biomarkers, while 10 of 16 known BRCA genes present in the input were missed - including FOXA1. This divergence between downstream performance and reasoning faithfulness suggests selective faithfulness in this setting: targeted confounder removal can improve predictive performance without comprehensive recall.

To address high data traffic demands of sixth-generation (6G) networks, this paper proposes a novel architecture that integrates autonomous aerial vehicles (AAVs) and multi-functional reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (MF-RISs) as AM-RIS in fluid antenna (FA)-assisted full-duplex (FD) networks. The AM-RIS provides hybrid functionalities, including signal reflection, amplification, and energy harvesting (EH), potentially improving both signal coverage and sustainability. Meanwhile, FA facilitates fine-grained spatial adaptability at FD-enabled base station (BS), which complements residual self-interference (SI) suppression. We aim at maximizing the overall energy efficiency (EE) by jointly optimizing transmit DL beamforming at BS, UL user power, configuration of AM-RIS, and positions of the FA and AM-RIS. Owing to the hybrid continuous-discrete parameters and high dimensionality of the intractable problem, we have conceived a self-optimized multi-agent hybrid deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework (SOHRL), which integrates multi-agent deep Q-networks (DQN) and multi-agent proximal policy optimization (PPO), respectively handling discrete and continuous actions. To enhance self-adaptability, an attention-driven state representation and meta-level hyperparameter optimization are incorporated, enabling multi-agents to autonomously adjust learning hyperparameters. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed AM-RIS-enabled FA-aided FD networks empowered by SOHRL algorithm. The results reveal that SOHRL outperforms benchmarks of the case without attention mechanism and conventional hybrid/multi-agent/standalone DRL. Moreover, AM-RIS in FD achieves the highest EE compared to half-duplex, conventional rigid antenna arrays, partial EH, and conventional RIS without amplification, highlighting its potential as a compelling solution for EE-aware wireless networks.

Computer-use agents (CUAs) can now autonomously complete complex tasks in real digital environments, but when misled, they can also be used to automate harmful actions programmatically. Existing safety evaluations largely target explicit threats such as misuse and prompt injection, but overlook a subtle yet critical setting where user instructions are entirely benign and harm arises from the task context or execution outcome. We introduce OS-BLIND, a benchmark that evaluates CUAs under unintended attack conditions, comprising 300 human-crafted tasks across 12 categories, 8 applications, and 2 threat clusters: environment-embedded threats and agent-initiated harms. Our evaluation on frontier models and agentic frameworks reveals that most CUAs exceed 90% attack success rate (ASR), and even the safety-aligned Claude 4.5 Sonnet reaches 73.0% ASR. More interestingly, this vulnerability becomes even more severe, with ASR rising from 73.0% to 92.7% when Claude 4.5 Sonnet is deployed in multi-agent systems. Our analysis further shows that existing safety defenses provide limited protection when user instructions are benign. Safety alignment primarily activates within the first few steps and rarely re-engages during subsequent execution. In multi-agent systems, decomposed subtasks obscure the harmful intent from the model, causing safety-aligned models to fail. We will release our OS-BLIND to encourage the broader research community to further investigate and address these safety challenges.

Metamorphic testing (MT) is a widely recognized technique for alleviating the oracle problem in software testing. However, its adoption is hindered by the difficulty of constructing effective metamorphic relations (MRs), which often require domain-specific or hard-to-obtain knowledge. In this work, we propose a novel approach that leverages the functional coupling between methods, which is readily available in source code, to automatically construct MRs and generate metamorphic test cases (MTCs). Our technique, MR-Coupler, identifies functionally coupled method pairs, employs large language models to generate candidate MTCs, and validates them through test amplification and mutation analysis. In particular, we leverage three functional coupling features to avoid expensive enumeration of possible method pairs, and a novel validation mechanism to reduce false alarms. Our evaluation of MR-Coupler on 100 human-written MTCs and 50 real-world bugs shows that it generates valid MTCs for over 90% of tasks, improves valid MTC generation by 64.90%, and reduces false alarms by 36.56% compared to baselines. Furthermore, the MTCs generated by MR-Coupler detect 44% of the real bugs. Our results highlight the effectiveness of leveraging functional coupling for automated MR construction and the potential of MR-Coupler to facilitate the adoption of MT in practice. We also released the tool and experimental data to support future research.

The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence has transformed benign cognitive offloading into a systemic risk of cognitive agency surrender. Driven by the commercial dogma of "zero-friction" design, highly fluent AI interfaces actively exploit human cognitive miserliness, prematurely satisfying the need for cognitive closure and inducing severe automation bias. To empirically quantify this epistemic erosion, we deployed a zero-shot semantic classification pipeline ($τ=0.7$) on 1,223 high-confidence AI-HCI papers from 2023 to early 2026. Our analysis reveals an escalating "agentic takeover": a brief 2025 surge in research defending human epistemic sovereignty (19.1%) was abruptly suppressed in early 2026 (13.1%) by an explosive shift toward optimizing autonomous machine agents (19.6%), while frictionless usability maintained a structural hegemony (67.3%). To dismantle this trap, we theorize "Scaffolded Cognitive Friction," repurposing Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) as explicit cognitive forcing functions (e.g., computational Devil's Advocates) to inject germane epistemic tension and disrupt heuristic execution. Furthermore, we outline a multimodal computational phenotyping agenda -- integrating gaze transition entropy, task-evoked pupillometry, fNIRS, and Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling (HDDM) -- to mathematically decouple decision outcomes from cognitive effort. Ultimately, intentionally designed friction is not merely a psychological intervention, but a foundational technical prerequisite for enforcing global AI governance and preserving societal cognitive resilience.

Dimensionality reduction is critical for deploying dense retrieval systems at scale, yet mainstream post-hoc methods face a fundamental trade-off: principal component analysis (PCA) preserves dominant variance but underutilizes representational capacity, while whitening enforces isotropy at the cost of amplifying noise in the heavy-tailed eigenspectrum of retrieval embeddings. Intermediate spectral scaling methods unify these extremes by reweighting dimensions with a power coefficient $γ$, but treat $γ$ as a fixed hyperparameter that requires task-specific tuning. We show that the optimal scaling strength $γ$ is not a global constant: it varies systematically with target dimensionality $k$ and is governed by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the retained subspace. Based on this insight, we propose Spectral Tempering (\textbf{SpecTemp}), a learning-free method that derives an adaptive $γ(k)$ directly from the corpus eigenspectrum using local SNR analysis and knee-point normalization, requiring no labeled data or validation-based search. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Spectral Tempering consistently achieves near-oracle performance relative to grid-searched $γ^*(k)$ while remaining fully learning-free and model-agnostic. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/liyongkang123/SpecTemp.

The distinction between genuine grassroots activism and automated influence operations is collapsing. While contemporary policy debates prioritize fully autonomous generative agents and synthetic content, this paper offers a conceptual contribution: we develop 'cyborg propaganda,' a closed-loop architecture combining verified human accounts with algorithmic automation to generate personalized content at scale, as a distinct and undertheorized threat to democratic discourse. By relying on verified citizens to ratify AI-generated messages, these campaigns exploit a regulatory gray zone that frameworks built on the human/bot binary (including the EU AI Act and Section 230) are structurally unable to address. Drawing on a conceptual analysis of coordination platforms and comparative examination of governance frameworks across democratic and non-democratic contexts, we analyze this paradox across micro, meso, and macro levels. We examine whether cyborg propaganda democratizes political power by unionizing influence or reduces citizens to cognitive proxies of a hidden directive, arguing that it shifts political discourse from a contest of ideas to a battle of algorithmic campaigns. We propose three regulatory responses: classifying coordination hubs as political action committees to enforce supply-chain transparency; mandating researcher access to platform data through DSA-style mechanisms; and establishing risk standards penalizing amplification of synthetically coordinated content. Comparative analysis reveals that viability varies structurally. Democratic states are simultaneously the most capable of regulation and the most rule-of-law constrained. By contrast, non-democratic actors face no comparable accountability, making international risk standards the primary cross-border enforcement mechanism.

We study robustness verification of neural networks via metric algebraic geometry. For polynomial neural networks, certifying a robustness radius amounts to computing the distance to the algebraic decision boundary. We use the Euclidean distance (ED) degree as an intrinsic measure of the complexity of this problem, analyze the associated ED discriminant, and introduce a parameter discriminant that detects parameter values at which the ED degree drops. We derive formulas for the ED degree for several network architectures and characterize the expected number of real critical points in the infinite-width limit. We develop symbolic elimination methods to compute these quantities and homotopy-continuation methods for exact robustness certification. Finally, experiments on lightning self-attention modules reveal decision boundaries with strictly smaller ED degree than generic cubic hypersurfaces of the same ambient dimension.

Increasing clinical trial protocol complexity, amendments, and challenges around knowledge management create significant burden for trial teams. Structuring protocol content into standard formats has the potential to improve efficiency, support documentation quality, and strengthen compliance. We evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system using generative LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for automated clinical trial protocol information extraction. We compare the extraction accuracy of our clinical-trial-specific RAG process against that of publicly available (standalone) LLMs. We also assess the operational impact of AI-assistance on simulated extraction Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) workflows. Our RAG process shows higher extraction accuracy (89.0%) than standalone LLMs with fine-tuned prompts (62.6%) against expert-supported reference annotations. In simulated extraction workflows, AI-assisted tasks are completed 40% faster, are rated as less cognitively demanding and are strongly preferred by users. While expert oversight remains essential, this suggests that AI-assisted extraction can enable protocol intelligence at scale, motivating the integration of similar methodologies into real-world clinical workflows to further validate its impact on feasibility, study start-up, and post-activation monitoring.

The past few years have seen the development of ``universal'' machine-learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) capable of approximating the ground-state potential energy surface across a wide range of chemical structures and compositions with reasonable accuracy. While these models differ in the architecture and the dataset used, they share the ability to compress a staggering amount of chemical information into descriptive latent features. Herein, we systematically analyze what the different uMLIPs have learned by quantitatively assessing the relative information content of their latent features with feature reconstruction errors, and observing how the trends are affected by the choice of training set and training protocol. We find that uMLIPs encode the chemical space in significantly distinct ways, with substantial cross-model feature reconstruction errors. When variants of the same model architecture are considered, trends become dependent on the dataset, target, and training protocol of choice. We also observe that fine-tuning of a uMLIP retains a strong pre-training bias in the latent features. Finally, we discuss how atom-level features, which are directly output by MLIPs, can be compressed into global structure-level features via concatenation of progressive cumulants, each adding significantly new information about the variability across the atomic environments within a given system.

Multi-sensory systems for embodied intelligence, from wearable body-sensor networks to instrumented robotic platforms, routinely face a sensor-asymmetry problem: the richest modality available during laboratory data collection is absent or impractical at deployment time due to cost, fragility, or interference with physical interaction. We introduce PULSE, a general framework for privileged knowledge transfer from an information-rich teacher sensor to a set of cheaper, deployment-ready student sensors. Each student encoder produces shared (modality-invariant) and private (modality-specific) embeddings; the shared subspace is aligned across modalities and then matched to representations of a frozen teacher via multi-layer hidden-state and pooled-embedding distillation. Private embeddings preserve modality-specific structure needed for self-supervised reconstruction, which we show is critical to prevent representational collapse. We instantiate PULSE on the wearable stress-monitoring task, using electrodermal activity (EDA) as the privileged teacher and ECG, BVP, accelerometry, and temperature as students. On the WESAD benchmark under leave-one-subject-out evaluation, PULSE achieves 0.994 AUROC and 0.988 AUPRC (0.965/0.955 on STRESS) without EDA at inference, exceeding all no-EDA baselines and matching the performance of a full-sensor model that retains EDA at test time. We further demonstrate modality-agnostic transfer with ECG as teacher, provide extensive ablations on hidden-state matching depth, shared-private capacity, hinge-loss margin, fusion strategy, and modality dropout, and discuss how the framework generalizes to broader embodied sensing scenarios involving tactile, inertial, and bioelectrical modalities.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been augmented with web search to overcome the limitations of the static knowledge boundary by accessing up-to-date information from the open Internet. While this integration enhances model capability, it also introduces a distinct safety threat surface: the retrieval and citation process has the potential risk of exposing users to harmful or low-credibility web content. Existing red-teaming methods are largely designed for standalone LLMs as they primarily focus on unsafe generation, ignoring risks emerging from the complex search workflow. To address this gap, we propose CREST-Search, a pioneering red-teaming framework for LLMs with web search. The cornerstone of CREST-Search is three novel attack strategies that generate seemingly benign search queries yet induce unsafe citations. It also employs an iterative in-context refinement mechanism to strengthen adversarial effectiveness under black-box constraints. In addition, we construct a search-specific harmful dataset, WebSearch-Harm, which enables fine-tuning a specialized red-teaming model to improve query quality. Our experiments demonstrate that CREST-Search can effectively bypass safety filters and systematically expose vulnerabilities in web search-based LLM systems, underscoring the necessity of the development of robust search models.