An assumption often made in supervised learning is that the training and testing sets have the same label distribution. However, in real-life scenarios, this assumption rarely holds. For example, medical diagnosis result distributions change over time and across locations; fraud detection models must adapt as patterns of fraudulent activity shift; the category distribution of social media posts changes based on trending topics and user demographics. In the task of label shift estimation, the goal is to estimate the changing label distribution $p_t(y)$ in the testing set, assuming the likelihood $p(x|y)$ does not change, implying no concept drift. In this paper, we propose a new approach for post-hoc label shift estimation, unlike previous methods that perform moment matching with confusion matrix estimated from a validation set or maximize the likelihood of the new data with an expectation-maximization algorithm. We aim to incrementally update the prior on each sample, adjusting each posterior for more accurate label shift estimation. The proposed method is based on intuitive assumptions on classifiers that are generally true for modern probabilistic classifiers. The proposed method relies on a weaker notion of calibration compared to other methods. As a post-hoc approach for label shift estimation, the proposed method is versatile and can be applied to any black-box probabilistic classifier. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST show that the proposed method consistently outperforms the current state-of-the-art maximum likelihood-based methods under different calibrations and varying intensities of label shift.

Embedding LLM-driven agents into environmental FAIR data management is compelling - they can externalize operational knowledge and scale curation across heterogeneous data and evolving conventions. However, replacing deterministic components with probabilistic workflows changes the failure mode: LLM pipelines may generate plausible but incorrect outputs that pass superficial checks and propagate into irreversible actions such as DOI minting and public release. We introduce EnviSmart, a production data management system deployed on campus-wide storage infrastructure for environmental research. EnviSmart treats reliability as an architectural property through two mechanisms: a three-track knowledge architecture that externalizes behaviors (governance constraints), domain knowledge (retrievable context), and skills (tool-using procedures) as persistent, interlocking artifacts; and a role-separated multi-agent design where deterministic validators and audited handoffs restore fail-stop semantics at trust boundaries before irreversible steps. We compare two production deployments. The University's GIS Center Ecological Archive (849 curated datasets) serves as a single-agent baseline. SF2Bench, a compound flooding benchmark comprising 2,452 monitoring stations and 8,557 published files spanning 39 years, validates the multi-agent workflow. The multi-agent approach improved both efficiency - completed by a single operator in two days with repeated artifact reuse across deployments - and reliability: audited handoffs detected and blocked a coordinate transformation error affecting all 2,452 stations before publication. A representative incident (ISS-004) demonstrated boundary-based containment with 10-minute detection latency, zero user exposure, and 80-minute resolution. This paper has been accepted at PEARC 2026.

We introduce LivingWorld, an interactive framework for generating 4D worlds with environmental dynamics from a single image. While recent advances in 3D scene generation enable large-scale environment creation, most approaches focus primarily on reconstructing static geometry, leaving scene-scale environmental dynamics such as clouds, water, or smoke largely unexplored. Modeling such dynamics is challenging because motion must remain coherent across an expanding scene while supporting low-latency user feedback. LivingWorld addresses this challenge by progressively constructing a globally coherent motion field as the scene expands. To maintain global consistency during expansion, we introduce a geometry-aware alignment module that resolves directional and scale ambiguities across views. We further represent motion using a compact hash-based motion field, enabling efficient querying and stable propagation of dynamics throughout the scene. This representation also supports bidirectional motion propagation during rendering, producing long and temporally coherent 4D sequences without relying on expensive video-based refinement. On a single RTX 5090 GPU, generating each new scene expansion step requires 9 seconds, followed by 3 seconds for motion alignment and motion field updates, enabling interactive 4D world generation with globally coherent environmental dynamics. Video demonstrations are available at cvsp-lab.github.io/LivingWorld.

Large language models demonstrate strong performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet remain surprisingly fragile to meaning-preserving surface perturbations. We systematically evaluate three open-weight LLMs, Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B, on 677 GSM8K problems paired with semantically equivalent variants generated through name substitution and number format paraphrasing. All three models exhibit substantial answer-flip rates (28.8%-45.1%), with number paraphrasing consistently more disruptive than name swaps. To trace the mechanistic basis of these failures, we introduce the Mechanistic Perturbation Diagnostics (MPD) framework, combining logit lens analysis, activation patching, component ablation, and the Cascading Amplification Index (CAI) into a unified diagnostic pipeline. CAI, a novel metric quantifying layer-wise divergence amplification, outperforms first divergence layer as a failure predictor for two of three architectures (AUC up to 0.679). Logit lens reveals that flipped samples diverge from correct predictions at significantly earlier layers than stable samples. Activation patching reveals a stark architectural divide in failure localizability: Llama-3 failures are recoverable by patching at specific layers (43/60 samples), while Mistral and Qwen failures are broadly distributed (3/60 and 0/60). Based on these diagnostic signals, we propose a mechanistic failure taxonomy (localized, distributed, and entangled) and validate it through targeted repair experiments: steering vectors and layer fine-tuning recover 12.2% of localized failures (Llama-3) but only 7.2% of entangled (Qwen) and 5.2% of distributed (Mistral) failures.

Real-world reasoning often requires combining information across modalities, connecting textual context with visual cues in a multi-hop process. Yet, most multimodal benchmarks fail to capture this ability: they typically rely on single images or set of images, where answers can be inferred from a single modality alone. This limitation is mirrored in the training data, where interleaved image-text content rarely enforces complementary, multi-hop reasoning. As a result, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently hallucinate and produce reasoning traces poorly grounded in visual evidence. To address this gap, we introduce CRIT, a new dataset and benchmark built with a graph-based automatic pipeline for generating complex cross-modal reasoning tasks. CRIT consists of diverse domains ranging from natural images, videos, and text-rich sources, and includes a manually verified test set for reliable evaluation. Experiments on this benchmark reveal that even state-of-the-art models struggle on such reasoning tasks. Models trained on CRIT show significant gains in cross-modal multi-hop reasoning, including strong improvements on SPIQA and other standard multimodal benchmarks.

Despite emerging use in Indonesian classrooms, there is limited large-scale, teacher-centred evidence on how AI is used in practice and what support teachers need, hindering the development of context-appropriate AI systems and policies. To address this gap, we conduct a nationwide survey of 349 K-12 teachers across elementary, junior high, and senior high schools. We find increasing use of AI for pedagogy, content development, and teaching media, although adoption remains uneven. Elementary teachers report more consistent use, while senior high teachers engage less; mid-career teachers assign higher importance to AI, and teachers in Eastern Indonesia perceive greater value. Across levels, teachers primarily use AI to reduce instructional preparation workload (e.g., assessment, lesson planning, and material development). However, generic outputs, infrastructure constraints, and limited contextual alignment continue to hinder effective classroom integration.

Diffusion language models (DLMs) enable parallel, non-autoregressive text generation, yet existing DLM mixture-of-experts (MoE) models inherit token-choice (TC) routing from autoregressive systems, leading to load imbalance and rigid computation allocation. We show that expert-choice (EC) routing is a better fit for DLMs: it provides deterministic load balancing by design, yielding higher throughput and faster convergence than TC. Building on the property that EC capacity is externally controllable, we introduce timestep-dependent expert capacity, which varies expert allocation according to the denoising step. We find that allocating more capacity to low-mask-ratio steps consistently achieves the best performance under matched FLOPs, and provide a mechanistic explanation: tokens in low-mask-ratio contexts exhibit an order-of-magnitude higher learning efficiency, so concentrating compute on these steps yields the largest marginal return. Finally, we show that existing pretrained TC DLMs can be retrofitted to EC by replacing only the router, achieving faster convergence and improved accuracy across diverse downstream tasks. Together, these results establish EC routing as a superior paradigm for DLM MoE models and demonstrate that computation in DLMs can be treated as an adaptive policy rather than a fixed architectural constant. Code is available at https://github.com/zhangshuibai/EC-DLM.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown strong performance in robotic manipulation, yet their robustness to physically realizable adversarial attacks remains underexplored. Existing studies reveal vulnerabilities through language perturbations and 2D visual attacks, but these attack surfaces are either less representative of real deployment or limited in physical realism. In contrast, adversarial 3D textures pose a more physically plausible and damaging threat, as they are naturally attached to manipulated objects and are easier to deploy in physical environments. Bringing adversarial 3D textures to VLA systems is nevertheless nontrivial. A central obstacle is that standard 3D simulators do not provide a differentiable optimization path from the VLA objective function back to object appearance, making it difficult to optimize through an end-to-end manner. To address this, we introduce Foreground-Background Decoupling (FBD), which enables differentiable texture optimization through dual-renderer alignment while preserving the original simulation environment. To further ensure that the attack remains effective across long-horizon and diverse viewpoints in the physical world, we propose Trajectory-Aware Adversarial Optimization (TAAO), which prioritizes behaviorally critical frames and stabilizes optimization with a vertex-based parameterization. Built on these designs, we present Tex3D, the first framework for end-to-end optimization of 3D adversarial textures directly within the VLA simulation environment. Experiments in both simulation and real-robot settings show that Tex3D significantly degrades VLA performance across multiple manipulation tasks, achieving task failure rates of up to 96.7\%. Our empirical results expose critical vulnerabilities of VLA systems to physically grounded 3D adversarial attacks and highlight the need for robustness-aware training.

This paper presents a systematic, cost-aware evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for receipt-item categorisation within a production-oriented classification framework. We compare four instruction-tuned models available through AWS Bedrock: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct, and Mistral 7B Instruct. The aim of the study was (1) to assess performance across accuracy, response stability, and token-level cost, and (2) to investigate what prompting methods, zero-shot or few-shot, are especially appropriate both in terms of accuracy and in terms of incurred costs. Results of our experiments demonstrated that Claude 3.7 Sonnet achieves the most favourable balance between classification accuracy and cost efficiency.

In reinforcement learning (RL), temporal difference (TD) errors are widely adopted for optimizing value and policy functions. However, since the TD error is defined by a bootstrap method, its computation tends to be noisy and destabilize learning. Heuristics to improve the accuracy of TD errors, such as target networks and ensemble models, have been introduced so far. While these are essential approaches for the current deep RL algorithms, they cause side effects like increased computational cost and reduced learning efficiency. Therefore, this paper revisits the TD learning algorithm based on control as inference, deriving a novel algorithm capable of robust learning against noisy TD errors. First, the distribution model of optimality, a binary random variable, is represented by a sigmoid function. Alongside forward and reverse Kullback-Leibler divergences, this new model derives a robust learning rule: when the sigmoid function saturates with a large TD error probably due to noise, the gradient vanishes, implicitly excluding it from learning. Furthermore, the two divergences exhibit distinct gradient-vanishing characteristics. Building on these analyses, the optimality is decomposed into multiple levels to achieve pseudo-quantization of TD errors, aiming for further noise reduction. Additionally, a Jensen-Shannon divergence-based approach is approximately derived to inherit the characteristics of both divergences. These benefits are verified through RL benchmarks, demonstrating stable learning even when heuristics are insufficient or rewards contain noise.

Volumetric CT imaging is essential for clinical diagnosis, yet annotating 3D volumes is expensive and time-consuming, motivating self-supervised learning (SSL) from unlabeled data. However, applying SSL to 3D CT remains challenging due to the high memory cost of full-volume transformers and the anisotropic spatial structure of CT data, which is not well captured by conventional masking strategies. We propose NEMESIS, a masked autoencoder (MAE) framework that operates on local 128x128x128 superpatches, enabling memory-efficient training while preserving anatomical detail. NEMESIS introduces three key components: (i) noise-enhanced reconstruction as a pretext task, (ii) Masked Anatomical Transformer Blocks (MATB) that perform dual-masking through parallel plane-wise and axis-wise token removal, and (iii) NEMESIS Tokens (NT) for cross-scale context aggregation. On the BTCV multi-organ classification benchmark, NEMESIS with a frozen backbone and a linear classifier achieves a mean AUROC of 0.9633, surpassing fully fine-tuned SuPreM (0.9493) and VoCo (0.9387). Under a low-label regime with only 10% of available annotations, it retains an AUROC of 0.9075, demonstrating strong label efficiency. Furthermore, the superpatch-based design reduces computational cost to 31.0 GFLOPs per forward pass, compared to 985.8 GFLOPs for the full-volume baseline, providing a scalable and robust foundation for 3D medical imaging.

The use of knowledge graphs for grounding agents in real-world Q&A applications has become increasingly common. Answering complex queries often requires multi-hop reasoning and the ability to navigate vast relational structures. Standard approaches rely on prompting techniques that steer large language models to reason over raw graph context, or retrieval-augmented generation pipelines where relevant subgraphs are injected into the context. These, however, face severe limitations with enterprise-scale KGs that cannot fit in even the largest context windows available today. We present GraphWalk, a problem-agnostic, training-free, tool-based framework that allows off-the-shelf LLMs to reason through sequential graph navigation, dramatically increasing performance across different tasks. Unlike task-specific agent frameworks that encode domain knowledge into specialized tools, GraphWalk equips the LLM with a minimal set of orthogonal graph operations sufficient to traverse any graph structure. We evaluate whether models equipped with GraphWalk can compose these operations into correct multi-step reasoning chains, where each tool call represents a verifiable step creating a transparent execution trace. We first demonstrate our approach on maze traversal, a problem non-reasoning models are completely unable to solve, then present results on graphs resembling real-world enterprise knowledge graphs. To isolate structural reasoning from world knowledge, we evaluate on entirely synthetic graphs with random, non-semantic labels. Our benchmark spans 12 query templates from basic retrieval to compound first-order logic queries. Results show that tool-based traversal yields substantial and consistent gains over in-context baselines across all model families tested, with gains becoming more pronounced as scale increases, precisely where in-context approaches fail catastrophically.

We present F3DGS, a federated 3D Gaussian Splatting framework for decentralized multi-agent 3D reconstruction. Existing 3DGS pipelines assume centralized access to all observations, which limits their applicability in distributed robotic settings where agents operate independently, and centralized data aggregation may be restricted. Directly extending centralized training to multi-agent systems introduces communication overhead and geometric inconsistency. F3DGS first constructs a shared geometric scaffold by registering locally merged LiDAR point clouds from multiple clients to initialize a global 3DGS model. During federated optimization, Gaussian positions are fixed to preserve geometric alignment, while each client updates only appearance-related attributes, including covariance, opacity, and spherical harmonic coefficients. The server aggregates these updates using visibility-aware aggregation, weighting each client's contribution by how frequently it observed each Gaussian, resolving the partial-observability challenge inherent to multi-agent exploration. To evaluate decentralized reconstruction, we collect a multi-sequence indoor dataset with synchronized LiDAR, RGB, and IMU measurements. Experiments show that F3DGS achieves reconstruction quality comparable to centralized training while enabling distributed optimization across agents. The dataset, development kit, and source code will be publicly released.

Shape from Focus (SFF) is a depth reconstruction technique that estimates scene structure from focus variations observed across a focal stack, that is, a sequence of images captured at different focus settings. A key limitation of SFF methods is their reliance on densely sampled, large focal stacks, which limits their practical applicability. In this study, we propose a focal stack augmentation that enables SFF methods to estimate depth using a reduced stack of just two images, without sacrificing precision. We introduce a simple yet effective physics-based focal stack augmentation that enriches the stack with two auxiliary cues: an all-in-focus (AiF) image estimated from two input images, and Energy-of-Difference (EOD) maps, computed as the energy of differences between the AiF and input images. Furthermore, we propose a deep network that computes a deep focus volume from the augmented focal stacks and iteratively refines depth using convolutional Gated Recurrent Units (ConvGRUs) at multiple scales. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed augmentation benefits existing state-of-the-art SFF models, enabling them to achieve comparable accuracy. The results also show that our approach maintains state-of-the-art performance with a minimal stack size.

We investigate training strategies that co-develop in-context learning (ICL) and in-weights learning (IWL), and the ability to switch between them based on context relevance. Although current LLMs exhibit both modes, standard task-specific fine-tuning often erodes ICL, motivating IC-Train - fine-tuning with in-context examples. Prior work has shown that emergence of ICL after IC-Train depends on factors such as task diversity and training duration. In this paper we show that the similarity structure between target inputs and context examples also plays an important role. Random context leads to loss of ICL and IWL dominance, while only similar examples in context causes ICL to degenerate to copying labels without regard to relevance. To address this, we propose a simple Contrastive-Context which enforces two types of contrasts: (1) mix of similar and random examples within a context to evolve a correct form of ICL, and (2) varying grades of similarity across contexts to evolve ICL-IWL mixtures. We present insights on the importance of such contrast with theoretical analysis of a minimal model. We validate with extensive empirical evaluation on four LLMs and several tasks. Diagnostic probes confirm that contrasted contexts yield stable ICL-IWL mixtures, avoiding collapse into pure ICL, IWL, or copying.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated promising capabilities in multimodal coding tasks such as chart-to-code generation. However, existing methods primarily rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which requires the model to learn code patterns through chart-code pairs but does not expose the model to a code execution environment. Moreover, while self-correction through execution feedback offers a potential route to improve coding quality, even state-of-the-art MLLMs have been shown to struggle with effective self-correction. In this work, we introduce MM-ReCoder, a chart-to-code generation model trained with reinforcement learning (RL) and equipped with self-correction ability. We propose a two-stage multi-turn self-correction RL strategy based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). The first stage enhances the model's self-correction ability via rolling out a shared first turn, while the second stage improves the coding capability with full-trajectory optimization. MM-ReCoder learns to produce more accurate and executable code through the interaction with the environment and by iteratively correcting its own outputs. Our results on three chart-to-code benchmarks demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of MM-ReCoder.

Memory-Augmented Generation (MAG) extends large language models with external memory to support long-context reasoning, but existing approaches universally treat memory as an external service that agents call into, delegating storage to separate pipelines of chunking, embedding, and graph extraction. This architectural separation means the system that stores knowledge does not understand it, leading to semantic drift between what the agent intended to remember and what the pipeline actually captured, loss of coordination context across agents, and fragile recovery after failures. In this paper, we propose ByteRover, an agent-native memory architecture that inverts the memory pipeline: the same LLM that reasons about a task also curates, structures, and retrieves knowledge. ByteRover represents knowledge in a hierarchical Context Tree, a file-based knowledge graph organized as Domain, Topic, Subtopic, and Entry, where each entry carries explicit relations, provenance, and an Adaptive Knowledge Lifecycle (AKL) with importance scoring, maturity tiers, and recency decay. Retrieval uses a 5-tier progressive strategy that resolves most queries at sub-100 ms latency without LLM calls, escalating to agentic reasoning only for novel questions. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval demonstrate that ByteRover achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on LoCoMo and competitive results on LongMemEval while requiring zero external infrastructure, no vector database, no graph database, no embedding service, with all knowledge stored as human-readable markdown files on the local filesystem.

Text-to-point-cloud localization enables robots to understand spatial positions through natural language descriptions, which is crucial for human-robot collaboration in applications such as autonomous driving and last-mile delivery. However, existing methods employ pooled global descriptors for similarity retrieval, which suffer from severe information loss and fail to capture discriminative scene structures. To address these issues, we propose SympLoc, a novel coarse-to-fine localization framework with multi-level alignment in the coarse stage. Different from previous methods that rely solely on global descriptors, our coarse stage consists of three complementary alignment levels: 1) Instance-level alignment establishes direct correspondence between individual object instances in point clouds and textual hints through Riemannian self-attention in hyperbolic space; 2) Relation-level alignment explicitly models pairwise spatial relationships between objects using the Information-Symplectic Relation Encoder (ISRE), which reformulates relation features through Fisher-Rao metric and Hamiltonian dynamics for uncertainty-aware geometrically consistent propagation; 3) Global-level alignment synthesizes discriminative global descriptors via the Spectral Manifold Transform (SMT) that extracts structural invariants through graph spectral analysis. This hierarchical alignment strategy progressively captures fine-grained to coarse-grained scene semantics, enabling robust cross-modal retrieval. Extensive experiments on the KITTI360Pose dataset demonstrate that SympLoc achieves a 19% improvement in Top-1 recall@10m compared to existing state-of-the-art approaches.

Traditional RL algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) typically train on the entire rollout buffer, operating under the assumption that all generated episodes provide a beneficial optimization signal. However, these episodes frequently contain noisy or unfaithful reasoning, which can degrade model performance and slow down training. In this paper, we propose \textbf{Influence-Guided PPO (I-PPO)}, a novel framework that integrates data attribution into the RL post-training loop. By calculating an influence score for each episode using a gradient-based approximation, I-PPO identifies and eliminates episodes that are anti-aligned with a validation gradient. Our experiments demonstrate that I-PPO consistently outperforms SFT and PPO baselines. We show that our filtering process acts as an intrinsic early stopping mechanism, accelerating training efficiency while effectively reducing unfaithful CoT reasoning.

Seizure detection from EEG signals is highly challenging due to complex spatiotemporal dynamics and extreme inter-patient variability. To model them, recent methods construct dynamic graphs via statistical correlations, predefined similarity measures, or implicit learning, yet rarely account for EEG's noisy nature. Consequently, these graphs usually contain redundant or task-irrelevant connections, undermining model performance even with state-of-the-art architectures. In this paper, we present a new perspective for EEG seizure detection: jointly learning denoised dynamic graph structures and informative spatial-temporal representations guided by the Information Bottleneck (IB). Unlike prior approaches, our graph constructor explicitly accounts for the noisy characteristics of EEG data, producing compact and reliable connectivity patterns that better support downstream seizure detection. To further enhance representation learning, we employ a self-supervised Graph Masked AutoEncoder that reconstructs masked EEG signals based on dynamic graph context, promoting structure-aware and compact representations aligned with the IB principle. Bringing things together, we introduce Information Bottleneck-guided EEG SeizuRE DetectioN via SElf-Supervised Learning (IRENE), which explicitly learns dynamic graph structures and interpretable spatial-temporal EEG representations. IRENE addresses three core challenges: (i) Identifying the most informative nodes and edges; (ii) Explaining seizure propagation in the brain network; and (iii) Enhancing robustness against label scarcity and inter-patient variability. Extensive experiments on benchmark EEG datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in seizure detection and provides clinically meaningful insights into seizure dynamics. The source code is available at https://github.com/LabRAI/IRENE.

How do LLMs decide what to teach next: by reasoning about a learner's knowledge, or by using simpler rules of thumb? We test this in a controlled task previously used to study human teaching strategies. On each trial, a teacher LLM sees a hypothetical learner's trajectory through a reward-annotated directed graph and must reveal a single edge so the learner would choose a better path if they replanned. We run a range of LLMs as simulated teachers and fit their trial-by-trial choices with the same cognitive models used for humans: a Bayes-Optimal teacher that infers which transitions the learner is missing (inverse planning), weaker Bayesian variants, heuristic baselines (e.g., reward based), and non-mentalizing utility models. In a baseline experiment matched to the stimuli presented to human subjects, most LLMs perform well, show little change in strategy over trials, and their graph-by-graph performance is similar to that of humans. Model comparison (BIC) shows that Bayes-Optimal teaching best explains most models' choices. When given a scaffolding intervention, models follow auxiliary inference- or reward-focused prompts, but these scaffolds do not reliably improve later teaching on heuristic-incongruent test graphs and can sometimes reduce performance. Overall, cognitive model fits provide insight into LLM tutoring policies and show that prompt compliance does not guarantee better teaching decisions.

Open-set test-time adaptation (OSTTA) addresses the challenge of adapting models to new environments where out-of-distribution (OOD) samples coexist with in-distribution (ID) samples affected by distribution shifts. In such settings, covariate shift-for example, changes in weather conditions such as snow-can alter ID samples, reducing model reliability. Consequently, models must not only correctly classify covariate-shifted ID (csID) samples but also effectively reject covariate-shifted OOD (csOOD) samples. Entropy minimization is a common strategy in test-time adaptation to maintain ID performance under distribution shifts, while entropy maximization is widely applied to enhance OOD detection. Several studies have sought to combine these objectives to tackle the challenges of OSTTA. However, the intrinsic conflict between entropy minimization and maximization inevitably leads to a trade-off between csID classification and csOOD detection. In this paper, we first analyze the limitations of entropy maximization in OSTTA and then introduce an angular loss to regulate feature norm magnitudes, along with a feature-norm loss to suppress csOOD logits, thereby improving OOD detection. These objectives form ROSETTA, a $\underline{r}$obust $\underline{o}$pen-$\underline{se}$t $\underline{t}$est-$\underline{t}$ime $\underline{a}$daptation. Our method achieves strong OOD detection while maintaining high ID classification performance on CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-100-C, Tiny-ImageNet-C and ImageNet-C. Furthermore, experiments on the Cityscapes validate the method's effectiveness in real-world semantic segmentation, and results on the HAC dataset demonstrate its applicability across different open-set TTA setups.

Automating the translation of Operations Research (OR) problems from natural language to executable models is a critical challenge. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in linear tasks, they suffer from severe performance degradation in real-world nonlinear scenarios due to semantic misalignment between mathematical formulations and solver codes, as well as unstable information extraction. In this study, we introduce NED-Tree, a systematic framework designed to bridge the semantic gap. NED-Tree employs (a) a sentence-by-sentence extraction strategy to ensure robust parameter mapping and traceability; and (b) a recursive tree-based structure that adaptively decomposes complex nonlinear terms into solver-compatible sub-elements. Additionally, we present NEXTOR, a novel benchmark specifically designed for complex nonlinear, extensive-constraint OR problems. Experiments across 10 benchmarks demonstrate that NED-Tree establishes a new state-of-the-art with 72.51% average accuracy, NED-Tree is the first framework that drives LLMs to resolve nonlinear modeling difficulties through element decomposition, achieving alignment between modeling semantics and code semantics. The NED-Tree framework and benchmark are accessible in the anonymous repository https://anonymous.4open.science/r/NORA-NEXTOR.

Uncertainty propagation in high-dimensional nonlinear dynamic structural systems is pivotal in state-of-the-art performance-based design and risk assessment, where uncertainties from both excitations and structures, i.e., the aleatoric uncertainty, must be considered. This poses a significant challenge due to heavy computational demands. Machine learning techniques are thus introduced as metamodels to alleviate this burden. However, the "black box" nature of Machine learning models underscores the necessity of avoiding overly confident predictions, particularly when data and training efforts are insufficient. This creates a need, in addition to considering the aleatoric uncertainty, of estimating the uncertainty related to the prediction confidence, i.e., epistemic uncertainty, for machine learning-based metamodels. We developed a probabilistic metamodeling technique based on a variational long short-term memory (LSTM) with augmented inputs to simultaneously capture aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Key random system parameters are treated as augmented inputs alongside excitation series carrying record-to-record variability to capture the full range of aleatoric uncertainty. Meanwhile, epistemic uncertainty is effectively approximated via the Monte Carlo dropout scheme. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian approaches, this method incurs negligible additional training costs while enabling nearly cost-free uncertainty simulation. The proposed technique is demonstrated through multiple case studies involving stochastic seismic or wind excitations. Results show that the calibrated metamodels accurately reproduce nonlinear response time histories and provide confidence bounds indicating the associated epistemic uncertainty.

Open-vocabulary human-object interaction (HOI) detection is a step towards building scalable systems that generalize to unseen interactions in real-world scenarios and support grounded multimodal systems that reason about human-object relationships. However, standard evaluation metrics, such as mean Average Precision (mAP), treat HOI classes as discrete categorical labels and fail to credit semantically valid but lexically different predictions (e.g., "lean on couch" vs. "sit on couch"), limiting their applicability for evaluating open-vocabulary predictions that go beyond any predefined set of HOI labels. We introduce SHOE (Semantic HOI Open-Vocabulary Evaluation), a new evaluation framework that incorporates semantic similarity between predicted and ground-truth HOI labels. SHOE decomposes each HOI prediction into its verb and object components, estimates their semantic similarity using the average of multiple large language models (LLMs), and combines them into a similarity score to evaluate alignment beyond exact string match. This enables a flexible and scalable evaluation of both existing HOI detection methods and open-ended generative models using standard benchmarks such as HICO-DET. Experimental results show that SHOE scores align more closely with human judgments than existing metrics, including LLM-based and embedding-based baselines, achieving an agreement of 85.73% with the average human ratings. Our work underscores the need for semantically grounded HOI evaluation that better mirrors human understanding of interactions. We will release our evaluation metric to the public to facilitate future research.

Multimodal tabular-image fusion is an emerging task that has received increasing attention in various domains. However, existing methods may be hindered by gradient conflicts between modalities, misleading the optimization of the unimodal learner. In this paper, we propose a novel Gradient-Aligned Alternating Learning (GAAL) paradigm to address this issue by aligning modality gradients. Specifically, GAAL adopts an alternating unimodal learning and shared classifier to decouple the multimodal gradient and facilitate interaction. Furthermore, we design uncertainty-based cross-modal gradient surgery to selectively align cross-modal gradients, thereby steering the shared parameters to benefit all modalities. As a result, GAAL can provide effective unimodal assistance and help boost the overall fusion performance. Empirical experiments on widely used datasets reveal the superiority of our method through comparison with various state-of-the-art (SoTA) tabular-image fusion baselines and test-time tabular missing baselines. The source code is available at https://github.com/njustkmg/ICME26-GAAL.

Large language models deployed in supportive or advisory roles must balance helpfulness with preservation of user autonomy, yet standard alignment methods primarily optimize for helpfulness and harmlessness without explicitly modeling relational risks such as dependency reinforcement, overprotection, or coercive guidance. We introduce Care-Conditioned Neuromodulation (CCN), a state-dependent control framework in which a learned scalar signal derived from structured user state and dialogue context conditions response generation and candidate selection. We formalize this setting as an autonomy-preserving alignment problem and define a utility function that rewards autonomy support and helpfulness while penalizing dependency and coercion. We also construct a benchmark of relational failure modes in multi-turn dialogue, including reassurance dependence, manipulative care, overprotection, and boundary inconsistency. On this benchmark, care-conditioned candidate generation combined with utility-based reranking improves autonomy-preserving utility by +0.25 over supervised fine-tuning and +0.07 over preference optimization baselines while maintaining comparable supportiveness. Pilot human evaluation and zero-shot transfer to real emotional-support conversations show directional agreement with automated metrics. These results suggest that state-dependent control combined with utility-based selection is a practical approach to multi-objective alignment in autonomy-sensitive dialogue.

In real-world robotic manipulation, states typically admit a neighborhood of near-equivalent actions. That is, for each state, there exist a feasible action neighborhood (FAN) rather than a single correct action, within which motions yield indistinguishable progress. However, prevalent VLA training methodologies are directly inherited from linguistic settings and do not exploit the FAN property, thus leading to poor generalization and low sample efficiency. To address this limitation, we introduce a FAN-guided regularizer that shapes the model's output distribution to align with the geometry of FAN. Concretely, we introduce a Gaussian prior that promotes locally smooth and unimodal predictions around the preferred direction and magnitude. In extensive experiments across both reinforced finetuning (RFT) and supervised finetuning (SFT), our method achieves significant improvement in sample efficiency, and success rate in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. By aligning with the intrinsic action tolerance of physical manipulation, FAN-guided regularization provides a principled and practical method for sample-efficient, and generalizable VLA adaptation.

Recent video multimodal large language models achieve impressive results across various benchmarks. However, current evaluations suffer from two critical limitations: (1) inflated scores can mask deficiencies in fine-grained visual understanding and reasoning, and (2) answer correctness is often measured without verifying whether models identify the precise spatio-temporal evidence supporting their predictions. To address this, we present VideoZeroBench, a hierarchical benchmark designed for challenging long-video question answering that rigorously verifies spatio-temporal evidence. It comprises 500 manually annotated questions across 13 domains, paired with temporal intervals and spatial bounding boxes as evidence. To disentangle answering generation, temporal grounding, and spatial grounding, we introduce a five-level evaluation protocol that progressively tightens evidence requirements. Experiments show that even Gemini-3-Pro correctly answers fewer than 17% of questions under the standard end-to-end QA setting (Level-3). When grounding constraints are imposed, performance drops sharply: No model exceeds 1% accuracy when both correct answering and accurate spatio-temporal localization are required (Level-5), with most failing to achieve any correct grounded predictions. These results expose a significant gap between surface-level answer correctness and genuine evidence-based reasoning, revealing that grounded video understanding remains a bottleneck for long-video QA. We further analyze performance across minimal evidence spans, atomic abilities, and inference paradigms, providing insights for future research in grounded video reasoning. The benchmark and code will be made publicly available.

A central challenge in mobile manipulation is preserving multiple plausible action models while remaining reactive during execution. A bottle in a cluttered scene can often be approached and grasped in multiple valid ways. Robust behavior depends on preserving this action diversity while remaining reactive as the scene evolves. Diffusion policies are appealing because they model multimodal action distributions rather than collapsing to one solution. But in practice, full iterative denoising is costly at control time. Action chunking helps amortize inference, yet it also creates partially open-loop behavior, allowing small mismatches to accumulate into drift. We present AnchorVLA, a diffusion-based VLA policy for mobile manipulation built on the core insight that when sampling begins near a plausible solution manifold, extensive denoising is unnecessary to recover multimodal, valid actions. AnchorVLA combines a lightweight VLA adaptation backbone with an anchored diffusion action head, which denoises locally around anchor trajectories using a truncated diffusion schedule. This retains multimodal action generation while reducing inference cost for closed-loop control. Crucially, to mitigate chunking-induced drift, we introduce a test-time self-correction mechanism via a lightweight residual correction module that makes high-frequency, per-step adjustments during rollout. Across diverse mobile manipulation tasks, AnchorVLA improves success and stability under disturbances and distribution shifts while maintaining low-latency inference. The source code is made available at https://github.com/jason-lim26/AnchorVLA.